
By the way, teacher, I bought some beverages. Would you like to drink? Oops, I spilled it!
The Izumi-kun that Mr. Araki draws feels purely like the usual crappy girl with a bad personality.
>>1Looks like you’re not reading.
Here, Rohan-sensei is feeling down, so I’m doing it on purpose…
But I believe it will have a happy ending…
I think the debut of Izumi-kun is quite similar to the usual women drawn by Araki-sensei.
I think this editing has both a calculated aspect done with consideration and a genuine aspect done naturally.
From the perspective of a background character caught up in JoJo’s Bizarre Adventure, it must be really insane, regardless of whether the opponent has a golden spirit or not.
The characters were feedbacked from the live-action version…
But I’ll make the circle into “four”…
>>9You helped prevent a scandal, didn’t you?
If it’s not at this level, I can’t manage the editing for Master Rohan…
Izumi-kun seems to have become the perfect person to be in charge of Rohan-sensei.
In live action, she sometimes looks like a heroine, but that’s not the case at all in the manga…
>>12The live-action adaptation is good, but it just feels forced with a sprinkle of romance elements…
>>19It’s the same as telling Rohan-chan, who is doing a shonen manga, to draw big breasts.
Since the drama has a wide target audience, it’s better to include romance.
There is no substitute for someone who can work with Rohan while properly sensing his subtle feelings and being concerned for him.
Seriously, this guy is trash.
>>14About Rohan-chan?
An editor who can win against Rohan in manga matters.
Rohan is an amazing person who can get along with others.
If you have an ordinary sensibility, you probably wouldn’t be able to keep up with Rohan’s editing…
>>18The editor who first showed their face has disappeared somewhere…
It’s essential for a manga editor to have the composure not to explode when suddenly told, “Come to Hawaii to pick up the manuscript, as the deadline is tomorrow.”
Throwing a burr.
Skipping the pasta sauce.
Didn’t you say in the afterword of volume 1 that you were feeling annoyed while drawing?
The introduction of enemies in Araki’s villain theory book is just too interesting.
When I first saw the drama version, what I thought was that Izumi-kun was too cute.
>>27Because even the costume is custom-made…
The style is too good.
>>27The person inside reached out.
The drama was actually successful in making Izumi-kun a heroine-like fixed character.
>>29The classic combination of a detective and an assistant makes it easier to create a story and the interactions are also enjoyable.
Izumi-kun’s perspective and connections are often helpful, and above all, his natural brightness is strong.
>>29Addition of romance elements that are common in live-action adaptations.
>>59I really fell in love.
>>59If you were watching the live-action version of “Non-moving,” you wouldn’t have such thoughts.
>>64Fans see it that way, though.
⚫︎⚫︎
⚫︎⚫︎
A girl who, despite being in a slump, can’t particularly launch an exact amount to an exact place, nevertheless throws pasta sauce anyway.
A power play to cheer up Rohan by making him angry when he’s feeling down.
I like the ones that bring the flow of the story to get a new standalone novel written.
The fact that the actors got together is a bit of noise for the work…
>>35Bless it.
>>36“We will do overseas location shooting.”
I’m fairly friendly with Bakin-chan.
It’s interesting that even in the darkness, Rohan is still Rohan, and it seems he didn’t want to change his four circles.
>>39Faithful to desire, outsmart the darkness and split into four.
The cause of death wasn’t because of Rohan, but because of a stalker, so it’s too competent.
I feel like I made quite a good play in the confession booth.
>>40The scene where the two rush in with the presence of light gives a strong sense of guaranteed victory.
In other words, the actor playing Izumi in the drama is too good at acting.
Well, of course, I will get married.
I acknowledge to some extent as an editor that I don’t want to let characters die during moments like the manners or the crocodile girl.
I think I’ve somehow established myself as a heroine who doesn’t move.
A flimsy fashion magazine girl who fits perfectly as a substitute for Okutai.
>>46The interpretation that each individual has a different book cover is too naïve…
>>47In this theatrical version as well, the local cast was made up with Heaven’s Door makeup and had it attached to their faces.
Because the facial structure is different from that of Japanese people, it was difficult to make it fit.
A woman who had no particular talent for manga editing but had the talent to be Rohan’s editor.
>>49The responsibility that was assigned to the teacher who is no longer in charge due to the issue with Kushagara will later be entrusted to me…
The influence of the drama version has made it a regular feature in the manga as well…
Speaking of which, Koichi-kun doesn’t show up, huh?
It would be a bit harsh to completely eliminate the romantic elements for an actor who has already gotten married.
In the early stages of the drama, it wasn’t that much.
It’s like a special editor for a crazy writer.
That feels like an actress who is naturally more beautiful is making an effort to become Izumi-kun.
She’s a woman who can even push through Rohan’s resistance and turn a circle into “four.”
Absolutely, Rohan-sensei’s passion for manga is never diminished, and Izumi-kun, who looks down on Rohan-sensei, is great, right?
In the novel version, I laughed at the treatment of “Well, it’s fine if Izumi-kun goes through something terrible…”
>>60She’s a woman who is conveniently strong mentally.
It feels like a clear and understandable element of a romantic relationship or a male-female buddy story.
Wait, in the live-action version there isn’t really a romance, right?
It was just that Rohan made contact.
I’ve never felt any romantic element from the way the character and Rohan treat each other…
Professor Rohan has Koichi-kun with him, you know! 💢💢💢
Sometimes I see people who reflect the actor’s personal circumstances in their characters, but that kind of thing is tough.
Which fan are you?
>>70If you’ve seen it, then…
Since Mr. Rohan also has significant issues with his personality, it probably wouldn’t last long as an editor without this kind of attitude…
Congratulations on getting married!
In both the Izumi Kundra and the original work, she has a boyfriend, right?
It just looks that way to those who want to see it that way…
Well, I’ll forgive it because the way Izumi-kun gets dumped by his ex-boyfriend in the drama is so absurd that it makes me laugh.
In reality, there is no salvation in environmental issues or the despair of activists or the women involved, but the fact that Izumi-kun believed the work depicting this had a happy ending somehow made me feel somewhat relieved while reading it.
I thought it was a relationship like Holmes and Watson.
Why can’t this guy speak in his own words about being a fan?
Having a partner character who is both affected by Rohan and is constantly messing with him makes it easier for the general audience to understand Rohan’s character.
I think it’s really annoying, but this character is just right for bringing out Rohan-chan’s goodness, especially since it’s a matter of life and death.
If Mr. Rohan were to mourn the loss of someone close to him
I think I’m at a position like Koichi-kun in 1st place and Izumi-kun in 2nd place.
If you make a decent person Rohan-sensei’s partner, Rohan-sensei might end up accumulating hate instead…
Is Mr. Rohhan going to marry the editor in charge? It seems like he might…
It’s Genta from Conan, Izumi-kun.
Having Rohan-chan suffer from time to time also gives it a sense of karmic retribution, adding to the flavor.
The ending where Masaru loses his temper at Izumi-kun in Hot Summer Masaru is funny, so Izumi-kun is necessary.
It seems like there are various ideas that could be used for a wealthy village.
I’m trying to cooperate and can handle Rohan’s editor.
There is also mental strength.
I don’t know the original work, but Rohan-chan and Izumi-kun are getting married, right?
Just the explanation that you can get along with Rohann-chan is enough, right?
>>90Dating Rohan-chan is tough unless you have both a strong side and a sense of goodness…
>>93Is it Kouichi-kun?
No matter how bothersome it is, I have no choice but to follow the professional editor…
Even if I experience something terrible, I’m like, “Well, that’s just how it is normally… but dying is a whole different thing!” It’s a good balance.
Izumi-kun is necessary to cover up Rohan’s worthless elements.
Because it’s the dregs of goodness vs. the dregs of goodness, I can laugh without reservation.
When it comes to heroines, it sounds good, but my role is that of a troublesome mascot character.
This character was born at the filming location and JoJo fan mount battle venue.
The way it’s kneaded is different.
By the way, do you understand Italian?
>>99The answer to this was the biggest horror.
Izumi-kun is crazy.
It’s reassuring that the kind of anomalies and curses that prey on human weaknesses don’t work because they are inherently foolish.
Personally, I feel a sense of relief that both Rohan and Izumi-kun come out safe in the end, so even with the strong horror elements, I can enjoy watching it.
Can the original character Izumi also nullify the black painting of the Louvre?
>>101It doesn’t exist in the first place.
Rokubekizaka too