
That’s quite an advanced dark side job.
Dark part-time jobs are scary…
Instead of having them attack directly, there are also methods like this…
Well, in reality, it doesn’t go this smoothly.
>>4
So, I just keep trying until it works!
>>7
There are probably others at different small restaurants doing the same sort of thing…
>>7
It’s good if you hit it once after doing it 100 times.
Upon closer inspection, I see that Ibashii only yelled and the part-timer fell down on their own…
Even without looking closely…
It seems like it could be extortion or obstruction of business.
Isn’t it just that they take the testimonies of the other employees and that’s it?
>>9
Even so, while things are in disarray, there will be reputational damage… and a considerable number of customers don’t care about the truth or the actual situation…
>>9
So, let’s take advantage of the situation where everyone is busy and not paying much attention.
If it goes to an actual trial, there will be traces of data manipulation, but considering the hassle and the negative reputation, it might be easier to just pay up…
Is the teacher who says it’s better to pay also in on it?
>>13
Not all lawyers, even if they’re not in a group, are passionate saints, so this is just how it is.
There’s no appeal in the content.
>>13
Trying to unilaterally assert the client’s claims and make them pay the full amount in compensation is probably the case…
If this develops into a trial even once, won’t it leave a record of the trial, making it unusable anymore?
>>14
Those who force others to go to court are disposable…
Even if you lose in court, you probably won’t have the ability to pay for the ammunition used in dark side jobs.
There’s nothing but loss.
(Komuro-kun turns in the police after receiving a nice reward.)
Making the other person think it’s a hassle is one way to go.
In any field, it’s important to use techniques that make the opponent think, “I don’t want to do this anymore, it’s fine to lose…” in a fight.
If you’re going to break the law, there are various ways to use a private investigation agency to track down Komuro’s location and even kidnap him when he comes to the courthouse.
The opposing lawyer is probably connected to the back, not someone that the part-timer hired.
This store hires part-time workers…
>>26
Regular members are leaving to be independent, and now we’re seriously in a crisis with manpower!
>>25
Cut and paste can be understood with just a little research.
The environmental sound cuts off abruptly, so it ends at the point when the data is submitted.
It’s a method that’s been around since ancient times.
It’s like an evolved version of finding hair in ramen.
Crimes evolve, so extortion and harassment also evolve.
In this way, a camera is attached to the kitchen…
On the contrary, it makes me think it might be a case where we could be sued, but at that time, would it just be enough to cut off one foolish low-ranking employee?
>>25
The people behind the scenes would cut ties as soon as they realized the other party wouldn’t back down.
It’s just ridiculous to present cut-and-paste editing as evidence.
>>32
I’m not trying to win in court just by making it a hassle to take it to court.
>>32
Aichi Prefectural Police “…”
It’s painful that the only thing that changes is that the minus becomes zero, and there’s no benefit to be gained from the commotion.
In the first place, the dark side part-time job guy probably doesn’t really intend to go to court seriously.
Ignoring is the right answer.
I wonder why they targeted a place that has a legal advisor.
>>37
Are they targeting places that seem to care about rumors?
>>37
Of course, they aim for places with money.
>>37
I believe the approach is to target places that seem averse to having their reputation damaged rather than whether they have a legal advisor or not.
It may be more successful to go as a legally protected employee rather than as a client looking to solicit.
If you just drift along for about six months, there will likely be no news at all.
They might spread it online as harassment and cause a controversy.
Even when working under a boss who normally hits, they don’t immediately hit the newcomers; they assess them properly before hitting.
It seems like personal restaurants might be wealthy and likely to engage in power harassment, so they are a good target!
Well, the scariest thing is definitely the harassment from those who misunderstood when it becomes public…
The reality is not about facts; once the smoke rises, there are people who casually keep criticizing, believing they are in the right and the other side is in the wrong!
That person Ibahashi from that store looks like Masahiro Nakai, so let’s go for it! Just a feeling.
If it goes to court, isn’t it them who will have a problem with this?
>>47
So if it looks like it’s going to go to court, I’ll quickly run away.
>>50
Then we should fight! Why did you say it’s better to pay?
>>52
If someone is the type to annoy you persistently and with full force, it can become extremely troublesome.
>>52
If you quickly accept the other party’s demands, you might minimize the damage.
While arguing and dragging things out, there is also a possibility that evidence of various unknowns could be spread around.
We need surveillance cameras in the kitchen too.
I heard that the Japanese restaurant over there got sued for power harassment!
If you scatter rumors like that, it’ll burn regardless of the truth.
>>51
Outdated traditional restaurants are just like that… so many people come flocking, not sure if they want to support or burn them down.
Once the settlement is finalized, I’ll actually spill this to a weekly magazine!
Being assertive doesn’t always mean the other person will back down.
If you think about risk management, paying for it and moving on might not be such a bad idea, probably.
Ninna-ji was defeated by something close to this.
I’m anonymous, so I’m full of ideas for harassment. Leave it to me.
By the way, will this result in a criminal trial?
This is trying to cover up the dark part-time job flow, but they’re definitely committing power harassment.
>>61
In this situation, I think it’s only natural to be cautioned about using a smartphone…
>>63
My smartphone is dirty.
>>63
You said my work is too sloppy!! Isn’t that considered power harassment?
>>78
It’s not just a specific word that’s considered power harassment…
>>82
It’s true that there are no specific words, but once you step into this area, the out rate goes up—it’s a super exciting zone.
For example, a pattern where the focus shifts to someone other than the person, like wanting to see the parent’s face.
From the perspective of the party making the accusation, it’s understandable to be reprimanded for something they’ve done, so they can’t really complain; however, when the conversation shifts to topics involving family, it’s easy to say, “That’s not right!” and now it can also be considered defamation.
A few years ago, the Self-Defense Forces issued disciplinary action against the superior in exactly the same case.
>>63
It is intimidating and beyond the person’s capacity, so it is power harassment.
In this case, you should first confirm with a calm and pleasant tone if you could have just a little bit of time. Then, affirm and praise the use of smartphones, but explain that it is not the right situation to use them right now and discuss how one can grow from this.
>>61
Not being able to teach properly or fiddling with a smartphone during work is definitely something that should be addressed.
Kuroda has come back?
It’s impossible with just audio.
By the way, does a voice recording in this situation hold any evidential value?
>>66
There shouldn’t be any edited versions, at least.
After provoking the opponent thoroughly, the recording of only the opponent’s insults is valid as long as the circumstances are not proven.
It’s tough that if a defamation case is filed, you would lose.
Even if it’s questionable whether it will go as far as filing a lawsuit if it’s about extortion.
It’s a problem that goes beyond perfection if you can’t wipe it up when it spills…
When looking at the total, it doesn’t go so simply, so I’m saying it’s better to pay a small amount.
It’s problematic if all the lawyers suddenly say to fight because the other party is at fault.
People involved with the law all say that if you can solve it with money, then solve it with money.
If you suddenly get naked and raise a sexual harassment commotion, is that how it works for you?
It’s not worth hiring people…
Yes… Mr. Ibashi has a habit of shouting when something bothers him, even from a long time ago… yes…
Did you not shine in the interview?
>>77
The goal is to slip in, so during the interview, I would respond seriously.
As a lawyer, I would say it’s better to avoid lawsuits like this because they really don’t offer any benefits to the client.
If the client is serious about it, they will see it through properly to the end.
Isn’t it just crazy that Timee only conducts screenings below the level of part-time jobs?
>>83
It’s a system where it’s easy for problematic people to blend in.
The trickster group targeting amateurs’ silent surrender has never changed throughout the ages.
Just saying it a bit more forcefully is no good.
The audio presented as evidence will be analyzed to confirm it hasn’t been edited, so if it has been spliced, it will be immediately exposed.
I feel like this advisory lawyer is too timid.
>>88
I don’t know if I can win, and even if I do, the rewards are just too minimal.
>>88
Because dealing with it takes time and there’s no profit to be gained.
>>88
Even if the lawyer loses, they still get paid, so they aren’t in trouble.
I’m just honestly advising that it’s better for Fujimura to quit since they only seem to be experiencing losses.
It’s really bothersome and it doesn’t really resolve things clearly, so it’s seriously a pain, and I need to say that right from the start.
Evidence that violence was committed solely through audio wouldn’t be sufficient, would it?
>>96
become
So, I will submit it and check if it has not been edited.
>>99
Whether it can be proven and lead to a verdict is a separate issue from whether it can be considered evidence.
If someone habitually takes notes, even a diary entry about being assaulted can serve as evidence.
>>96
So I will also add the medical certificate for the injury.
Even if we win, there’s nothing to gain, and once it goes to court, the rumors that say “it became a lawsuit” will cause far more damage than just 1 million yen.
If the opponent has no reason to fight, they will probably back down if we become a little assertive, but if by chance they don’t back down, no one will benefit.
It may be on the borderline of being called harassment.
Just saying that I want to see my parent’s face makes me lose instantly.
Then we need to examine whether the recorded audio can serve as evidence…
By the way, what will happen to the thread image?
>>104
Come to apologize and that’s it.
“There is particularly no intent to stop the Yakuza.”
I wonder if the time will come when only trustworthy connections will be hired.
>>94
It seems that even gentle and careful guidance can be considered harassment, so I’m stuck.
Well, in these times, both part-time job terrorism and shady part-time jobs are widely known, so I won’t easily believe it.
>>94
If the range of fluctuation is large, it’s the guy who keeps complaining that is at fault! It feels like we’re going back to that again.
There are people who claim harassment in the same way they assert human rights or discrimination if something happens.
I feel like I’m in a state where I can do anything because I see myself as a victim who is suffering loss.
What’s up with lawyers who cooperate with delinquents or thugs? Their reputation is terrible, and they could end up losing their license.
>>112
Defending a criminal perpetrator is the lowest, isn’t it?
It’s harassment depending on how the person who was scolded feels.
>>113
If there’s no other way, we’ll settle it in court.
As a result, sometimes very embarrassing judgments are issued.
Can someone who comes to a dark part-time job do something this advanced?
Awesome…
>>115
In reality, I probably can’t record decent audio and might get scolded by the person giving instructions for what I’m doing.
By the way, if you do a little research, you’ll immediately find out about voice cutting and pasting.
It’s like the other party’s lawyer is in on it too.
It’s kind of suspicious that a guy who might not even be a real lawyer is coming.
>>119
Since they are coming directly to threaten me instead of sending it in writing, there is a high probability it is a fake.
It’s scary, isn’t it? Bioterrorism.
Well, even the Japanese police are submitting edited clips as evidence!
But it took two years until the trial ended!!
The only happy ending I can see is serving pufferfish liver sushi as an apology, and that settles the matter.
When Nanashi-chan was lured on social media with a fictional story and ended up having sexual relations with a married woman.
I heard you were told by your lawyer to pay 500,000.
Using a smartphone while serving food to customers is not good.
How did you win from here?
>>127
For now, I came to apologize because I felt guilty about this guy.
That’s all.
>>127
If we show a stance of resolute resistance, I apologize! If I say that I really didn’t want to do it and apologize, then it should settle down nicely and end.
>>131
It’s not settled because it’s just like the Yakuza.
Isn’t it basically a hassle to deal with anti-social forces? Wouldn’t it be better to do something more profitable in less time?
>>128
Lazy people are the ones who are being made to do it.
>>128
If it’s a million in three days, that’s probably enough.
It’s a surprise attack method that expects to fleece money at this timing.
The one who is troubled by the prolonged situation and the resulting bad debt is rather the other party.
>>129
I’ll do it thoroughly! Because it would be a problem if I don’t!
The defense is weak because it is based on the assumption and prediction that the opponent will not counterattack.
Fujimura is getting tangled up too much, despite being strange.
There are quite a few customers who get violent and try to escape after a show, but is it really okay for them to just leave without paying?!
There are many stories that end with expressing feelings without really resolving anything.
Does the Anti-Organized Crime Law not apply?
My name is Mr. Inpura. I’m a jack-of-all-trades responsible for managing the I! fans in the company and network monitoring. It seems I also have a side of being an administrator for external server implementations. I’m told that I’m quite skilled at it. When it comes to administrative privileges for programs, what is this guy talking about? There were cases regarding designated companies that I couldn’t inquire about, and that’s why I took the liberty to address it. I handle the HR role, and he mentioned that even outside the company, I manage administrative IDs and perform various tasks. On this screen, I’m engaged in global operations. In this world, the lead bus is a background of mine. Why? Why? I had the API, but what should I call? I was wondering if I could announce something to development to issue administrative privileges afterward. What are you talking about? It was quick. Since it’s a matter related to outsiders, it may be outside the jurisdiction. The incidents originate from the company’s system, specifically for designated corporate servers. It’s about extending administrative privileges for the designated company’s system. Why? This doesn’t exist, right? The trace of the company’s role is not a good child. I’m completely okay with parenting as well. It’s becoming such a complicated situation.
If you’re targeting companies, I think this kind of thing can draw out a huge amount of money.
>>140
I’m glad I have a boss who confirms things properly.
>>160
I don’t think we ever gave the global administrator ID to this section chief in the first place.
The standards for power harassment seem quite different between the past and now.
>>141
If the person who receives it thinks it’s power harassment, then it is power harassment.
>>142
Just because subjectivity and claims are all acknowledged, it doesn’t mean that an agreement can be reached, so if we can’t find common ground, let’s go to court.
>>141
Actually, in our case, a new employee on their second day was finally able to open this document’s numbers in the template and input them into the PC.
There was a case where someone complained about being subjected to power harassment because they weren’t addressed with polite language when told to “just get it done.”
>>145
I’ve been spoken to with honorifics by my parents since I was little, and it reminds me of a newcomer who stood up to their boss from the very first day.
>>149
Don’t hire someone like that!
First of all, if you bring up money, it’s 100% going to be a scam.
I feel like instead of doing something like this, if there’s a slave who will listen to anything, it might be better to collect 10% of their part-time wages as a tribute every month.
>>144
Rather than taking a few thousand yen every month from a loser who’s a slave to the yakuza, it’s better to go all out and get a million with the understanding that it’s disposable.
>>144
The longer you use it, the more flaws will show, so I finish it quickly in a short period.
Also, there are various other things like welfare fraud that can be exploited for a long time.
I’m coming directly because written documents leave evidence.
There was a time when a temp office worker complained that she was touched inappropriately, and her boss was transferred because of it. I thought that women are strong as a vulnerable person.
>>150
It came around in the materials for administrators that while power harassment must be addressed, immediate penalties should be avoided as they can lead to trouble; however, it was written that sexual harassment should be penalized immediately depending on the confirmation of facts…
This manga was set in modern times.
It’s interesting how those who aren’t suited for the organization often have such high aspirations; they seem to believe that their demands should be respected and accepted no matter what.
I wonder how they were raised.
There was a situation where if I answered a dirty joke, it was treated as sexual harassment.
I was asked if I’ve ever been hospitalized, and I have been hospitalized for kidney stones.
A man who was reprimanded for using inappropriate language in front of female employees.
Even though I was scolded by my boss and HR, I was still given some sympathy.
>>156
What’s wrong with it!?
>>161
You can definitely tell your boss that this itself is power harassment.
>>161
It would have been better if it were a stone.
The ureter was perceived as unnecessary information.
>>163
Boss, you’re an idiot!
>>169
Well, both the boss and HR are already at fault. Even so, the female employees are expressing discomfort and causing a fuss…
Essentially, it’s close to being a scam artist.
Unless it’s raw audio data, it won’t serve as any evidence because it’s been edited.
It’s a difficult time now, isn’t it?
I have been completely rejecting communication for almost 10 years…
For now, it’s not as invincible as it was a while ago, and in cases of malicious ones, the woman who filed the complaint has been disciplined for false reporting…
The stupid woman who falsely reported being raped at a government office the other day and faced disciplinary action was not named publicly.
Maybe it’s a ureter…
I know someone who was criticized for sexual harassment in a similar case…
A: Do you have children?
B: I have one child in middle school, but how about you, A?
This seems to be sexual harassment towards person A by person B.
>>167
It will happen.
>>170
Why…
Do you have children too, or are you just responding?
>>176
Rather, I think that what A initially said doesn’t fall under sexual harassment towards B, but it seems that B is at fault.
>>179
I feel like I can’t live in this world because it’s too complicated…
>>176
In a world where confirming whether others have children after stating that you have children is considered a form of showing off,
>>184
Isn’t the world crazy?
You can lead questions as much as you want and accumulate harassment points.
>>189
From the perspective of a complainer, it’s basic technique.
>>170
Asking about the other person’s sexual preferences or whether they are married or not without knowing is sexual harassment!
It’s a common trouble where you say, “You asked first.”
>>167
Is this really a true story?
Isn’t it insane that B is being dealt with like this?
>>192
With the combination of the adjustment disorder diagnosis, B was expelled!
In modern society, weakness is a weapon…
It is a terrifying era, but there are those who perceive it as a backlash against the old, bad times.
The correct answer is silence…
It’s hard not to think that it’s a politician who loses their position over just a single inappropriate comment.
Why are there two stories about sexual harassment being recognized in relation to the ureter?
I just want to end it with a commotion.
The bad guys bring strange organizations with them.
The office girls aren’t doing much work, yet they keep waving their rights around. What a joke!
Don’t act so important at the company.
>>178
Yes, sexual harassment and moral harassment.
“We also had a kid who joined midway, and they were fired up talking about how they used labor standards because their previous company was a black company.”
I started using my personal tablet at the new company without permission and made my own rules.
You were a very strong child.
I’m glad the contract expired and I didn’t get continued employment.
I can’t help but think that women are the strongest, right?
>>185
LGBT people are strong.
I don’t understand why if a boss gives advice or follows up, it takes away growth opportunities and becomes white harassment.
It’s the HR’s fault for not being able to weed out that kind of person.
As expected, it seems like the anonymous person is just making things up randomly…
With more of this happening, it’s no wonder wages in the world aren’t rising.
>>194
The world has become such that it is a struggle for companies to raise salaries due to the complexity of laws, and the prevalence of such matters is a background to this situation.
Don’t trust stories that supposedly come from someone without a name.
It’s funny that there are people who seem to have never worked and think this is power harassment.