I was there.

Anonymous

>>6

True evil doesn’t think of itself as evil, right?

Gomar of DAIMA

>>4

He was just a bad guy with no unfortunate background.

I realized that those who say things like this while looking at Narou are much more immature.

>>8

I might actually have a better sense of things, don’t you think?

>>8

You can understand it even without reading it, right?

It has been portrayed from the beginning as a character with childish desires seeking strong evil.

>>8

This is the malicious thinking that wants to gain agreement by referencing something that is clearly seen as an enemy.

>>10

I thought he was quite an interesting guy personally.

I wondered if someone who feels lonely because they can only live as if they were created as evil and have no equal truly represents a purely evil being that can be defeated to bring relief.

Isn’t it just a survival competition?

Someone who is messing up the bulletin board.

>>12

Is the patient pure evil…?

>>86

It depends on the definition of evil.

In recent years, simple villains have been trending again.

>>13

Recently, it seems that there are many patterns where the person has no awareness of their evil, even though it’s simple evil.

>>15

There are many works where the protagonist is portrayed as simply evil without self-awareness and their actions are depicted as righteous.

Muzan was simply selfish.

I would rather hope there is a reason.

I would rather deal with someone who has a reason to be evil than one who has none.

It’s hard to believe that JoJo isn’t even aware of it being the darkest of all, but it makes you think…

Isn’t there a difference between a psychopathic person who is unaware and pure evil?

What is pure evil, to begin with?

Even though he’s a villain, it makes you think that the reason he became one was because of that…

My happy marriage, the final boss of this season, has been a pain since my childhood, irreparably flawed even without that.

Even though the five-fingered characters were popular, I feel like there wasn’t much of that with Six.

I guess that’s why they chose that character design.

Is the inability to choose a path other than living as evil seen as purity?

The very mentality of having the option to choose another way of life but deliberately choosing the path of evil, is it to be seen as purity?

It’s boring if there are just the same kind of villains.

Is it the case that a villain is just a stage element and nothing more is needed?

The demons of Onigashima seem to have no background and are nothing more than beings who are simply defeated by Momotarō.

>>25

I often think the same thing about superhero stories.

I want to see the hero’s exploits, not the struggles of a full-sized human.

If Six were just pure evil, there would be no need to pick a fight with Neuro, right?

For Six, the enemy of humanity, the demon Neuro is outside of their jurisdiction.

Ah, if you just present a villain that’s like “Oh, I’m really bad, huh?” and gets drunk on their own wickedness, that’s just boring…

I wonder if those who recognize themselves as evil are truly pure evil.

I wish that evil had a reason even just in fiction.

Reality has more pure evil than fiction, doesn’t it?

>>33

There are clear benefits to not following the rules, as it differs slightly in nature from the disadvantages that arise for the sake of storytelling.

Selling off items in a safe deposit box would also be wrong.

>>33

Fiction has to be interesting, but reality is not like that.

>>33

The perpetrators of family massacre cases are all extremely dangerous.

I think it’s quite impressive to be sitting in front of my boss enjoying a lavish meal while I sip slowly on a one-cup sake with a lemon slice.

The charisma of Six has no effect at all.

Don’t do bad things by trying to do bad things.

It’s just that in prioritizing profit and emotions, there are also bad things that happen, so those who work hard to do bad things in order to become worse are also warped.

It’s nice that they are just enemies set up from the beginning as beings that cannot coexist, without feeling like they are evil.

Evil is something trivial.

Uncle Kasai had a captivating charm that attracted people…

Even though he’s a worthless arsonist…

>>37

It’s good that you don’t kill your nephew here.

>>37

At first, it was like “Sorry, I’ll turn it off” with the old lady who smokes, right?

>>37

He just wanted to set fires for fun, but other than that, he actually seemed like an easygoing guy to be around.

Six feels like an overpowered harassing old man.

It seems a bit… thin to call it evil…

I learned that there is something called the “Sphere of Coexistence of Raiders,” and while it’s probably pure evil, I still think the name is lame.

>>39

Because it’s an enlarged community of middle and high school students…

There was a time when it felt like there were many of these, but recently I feel like I’ve been seeing villains that can just be punched normally.

Maybe the Ministry of Finance.

Six is kind of cramped, you know?

Repeating petty annoyances with a smirk on my face.

>>45

That guy is somewhat unaware of it himself, but look, I’m this bad! Isn’t it amazing? That’s why I want you to be my friend!! He’s just a lonely person desperately trying to make friends with all his heart…

There are people complaining, but this was over 20 years ago…

>>48

Of course, it’s interesting that even the villains in a story have their reasons; conflicts arise because both sides have their reasons.

It’s just that there are more of those kinds of things, and it’s only a twisted brat who complains about them for some reason.

Rao Moto-san

>>50

But if you imitate a madman, you might actually become a madman…

Six has simply stopped being a puzzle-solving manga rather than defining a villain.

Muzan and the like of pure evil.

>>53

I think it was good that even though Ryomen Sukuna was in a position that seemed likely to be bound, it ended up being just plain terrible.

>>57

I think Sukuna is more neutral in terms of alignment.

Sometimes I get excited and act a bit naughty, but…

>>57

It’s more like evil, or maybe something else.

It feels like that kind of person.

Muzan doesn’t have a conscious thought like “Let’s do something bad!” which makes his pure evil quite high.

>>55

I want to live a long life!! I have no other thoughts than that.

It felt like a character that had thoroughly studied a disgraceful part of Dio.

>>58

I want to go outside during the day!

>>55

When considering Muzan-sama as a being known as Muzan-sama, he hasn’t killed more people than necessary and is living a relatively better life.

>>81

I just want to live quietly…

>>81

I think it’s a disaster that I met you.

If it’s a disaster, it’s only natural that appropriate measures are taken…

Pure evil exists in reality, so there’s no point in depicting such things in fiction.

People who want to see that kind of thing watch not shonen jump but rather depraved manga.

In other words, Sukuna is an example of a character who, while he seemingly has some backstory (or at least it feels like he does), is just a strong enemy with little depiction in the main storyline, which doesn’t work very well for storytelling…

There was a talk that everyone in Dragon Ball is pure evil, which makes it easy to watch.

Vegeta’s sad past is after he became an ally.

I can only say that Six-kun should read more of Monkey-sensei’s manga.

You’re only watching works meant for kids, so that’s why you come up with such a childish impression.

>>69

It’s a sense that doesn’t easily come out even in works aimed at kids… Evil King!

I think that even if there is such a thing as pure evil, it would be quickly eliminated from society, so it wouldn’t grow to the position of a mastermind of evil.

I think it’s something that can be explained by sociology or something like that.

>>70

The reality of a mastermind of evil has to be considerate of civilians and the police, which makes it far from pure evil.

>>74

Well, isn’t it wrong to say that if one engages in self-preservation or maneuvering, they are not purely evil?

There is no causal relationship.

Isn’t Narou purely evil?

It would be troubling if a mere pawn had both good traits and a bad setup, right?

It sounds good to hear “pure evil,” but…

Is it an animal that can’t really judge right from wrong?

The guys from the Urban Legend Deconstruction Center’s social media…

Despite having a sad past, the purely evil Father Pucci is amazing.

Is it Kamiyama?

On the contrary, I don’t really understand the feeling of valuing something like pure evil.

What is pure evil like, is it like Majin Buu?

>>77

Is it really questionable if Pure Buu is an interesting character?

>>77

At least regarding the thread image, this old man is the type of abnormal criminal who personally wants to commit arson as a hobby and cause a big uproar.

It’s just a lonely thought that I’m the only one who can’t get along with a society that classifies acting on desires as evil.

>>77

The conversation changes between the first and second lines, but for now, I will say them separately.

The first line suggests that a villain who is thoroughly evil is more commendable in character than one who makes excuses.

If the second line is referring to the last Pure Buu, then I think it would fall into the category of pure evil.

About 25 years ago, I was told a lot of things like the ones in the thread image.

In the past 20 years, it’s rare to see poor villains anymore.

>>78

How about a collaboration between ninjas and the yakuza?

If someone is born into a wealthy family and has kind parents, but still becomes a criminal, would that be pure evil?

>>84

I sometimes see characters who have been spoiled too much and their brakes are broken.

Rather, it should be a simple young man who was born to decent parents and raised in a pastoral rural area, loving music.

Shishio is pure evil.

Fate is not pure evil.

>>90

I want to kill the family of my benefactor, who is living happily, more than for the sake of money.

>>97

It’s a deed that’s hard to sympathize with, but from their perspective and generally speaking, they have a sad past…

The reason for the failure of En is that it is unable to fully embody either pure evil or sympathetic evil.

>>108

That’s why there is a human touch, isn’t it?

I think it’s a bit of an oversimplification to see pure evil just from watching the news.

Perfect evil is difficult in reality, if not impossible, even if it is fictional.

The reasoning is too shallow, like saying I’m bad so I do bad things…

However, even considering the good character, it’s a bit ambiguous that they could only desire their kind or be fixated on evil.

Rather, it’s typical of the childishness found on the internet to start saying “let’s try it” in this kind of conversation.

>>96

Well, it’s unrelated to the flow of the conversation, but the unilateral selfishness of bringing up something you want to belittle is indeed more akin to a toddler than anything bad.

>>96

It feels like the usual guy is just saying it…

Because it’s Narou, there are no stupid reasons or logic, and labeling them makes communication impossible.

I don’t want to believe that there are others like that.

I can’t express it well, but I feel like evil and abnormal people are different.

The latter refers to things like trolling.

Those with a background that has the persuasive power to commit evil deeds are simply villains.

Although it appears that someone is not a bad person because the scary and unpleasant aspects are mitigated by being persuasive and easy to understand,

Whether something is bad or not has nothing to do with persuasiveness.

Takei-kun has a strangely strong bad luck, and there are also times when he has accumulated misfortunes.

It’s tough when excuses come into play, not just for villains.

And it’s easy for excuses to come in for the villain.

The rest is about infidelity, contradictions with settings or natural phenomena, and convenient plot developments.

Rather than making excuses, it’s better to let it slide and be able to use it as material in later years, as many great works often become topics of discussion.

Trying to understand the thoughts of those who are trolling forums and social media just brings overwhelming fatigue, and there’s no catharsis at all.

>>103

Well, of course, it’s a being that doesn’t have the charm of a manga character.

>>110

Unlike manga characters, real humans are complex beings with a lot of information, so understanding them is difficult.

The fact that it’s difficult to understand means that its existence is irritating, so even acts like just trolling on a bulletin board are unforgivable! I dislike it! My feelings become so strong that it seems like an outrageous evil.

It seems that there is a lot of pure evil beyond the news because there is little information available on the other side of the news.

When trying to determine whether a limited part of an individual’s life is good or bad, the conclusion tends to become extreme.

It seems like after Joker talked about his sad past, he suddenly started telling a completely unrelated sad past story that had no connection to what he just said.

Not receiving moral education or being poor can also be considered a sad past.

When a character representing pure evil causes significant damage, defeating them doesn’t feel satisfying at all.

It was something like Takahiro’s works.

I thought Sukuna and pure evil were like that, but I was mistaken.

>>115

In that work, Masato might be closer.

Just a mere serial killer, killed by family, lovers, and friends.

I captured it, but I just killed it because I wanted to kill it!! What kind of catharsis is there in that kind of defiance?

>>117

People who read Narou are feeling a sense of catharsis.

>>117

Shall we create a return with a prize reward?

>>128

What has been lost will not return.

If you dig deep into pure evil, won’t you end up with something like Skynet or a virus-like simple threat that lacks personality?

>>119

When it gets to that point, it becomes hard to call it evil, like a disaster or a natural calamity.

>>119

Because it exists without malice or its intent is unclear, that is not evil but an enemy.

Many people confuse evil with the enemy.

>>119

In other words, zombies are pure evil.

>>119

I feel that the presence or absence of malice is quite significant.

Well, I don’t have much knowledge or admiration for what they call pure evil, so I don’t really understand it.

In American comics, the Joker is super interesting at first, but as you learn more about other villains, he ends up being just… okay in terms of likeability ranking among villains.

>>120

Whether it’s the Joker or Two-Face, they are basically just sources of chaos and harassment, and my feelings of “enough already!” are getting stronger and stronger.

Is it really that interesting for a sociopath who just wants to disrupt public order to go crazy and, when pushed to the edge, say something like “I’ve seen good things, I’m satisfied now, so hurry up and kill me, and you’ll become a murderer too”?

>>121

Ah, is this the age where one praises such developments as innovative?

As mentioned above, I feel that Lao Mot Kan from Shinobi Assassination is quite pure evil.

A great villain who is wicked, greedy, and powerful, without any sad past at all.

Even if I kill monsters that eat humans, the relief I feel is thin, lacking a sense of satisfaction.

In the first place, regarding Six, Neuro is the only one that takes it seriously as a significant life form, but I see it completely as a lowly pest that doesn’t pique my interest, doesn’t it?

I want to see the victory of good above all, and I don’t really care much about what kind of evil opposes it.

The original work was quite a while ago, but recently, Regulus left quite an impression.

The vessel was too small, which ironically made it a big deal.

Mouse washing Jimmy is scoring high.

What about the cult master who believes that discussing good and evil truly leads to salvation?

First, the scene in the image is one where the uncle, captivated by Six, who is created as a malevolent being, explains that he knows of such an existence. Therefore, the “pure evil” that this uncle refers to is, in essence, the kind of evil that is devoid of impurities related to humanity, so to speak, from Six’s perspective.

In terms of purely being a bad person, this uncle is actually closer.

I prefer the Penguin over the Joker, and in live-action, the batting average is high.

I like how Muzan never fundamentally changed until the end and how he died miserably.

>>140

Take me forward knowing the reason I can become stronger.

Basically, Six is just doing it because they can’t resist their instincts, so it’s not a bad thing, right?

I cannot choose with my own will.

It’s no different from a cuckoo.

>>141

Isn’t it wrong for someone to repeatedly commit rape out of sexual desire?

>>145

It’s not that it’s bad, but it kind of turns into a being like a “menhera.”

I think it’s well-made because Muzan has a somewhat sad background, yet is not sympathized with.

Are you sad…?

Six is said to be the most evil in the sense that it poses the highest threat level to humans on an individual basis.

To put it more simply, what is “scary” from the uncle’s perspective is the purity of evil for the uncle.

I feel that the purity of evil is diminished because feeling sympathy makes it no longer scary.

I recently saw a big-breasted woman happily talking about how she created a virus that turned the only weapon to fight off invaders from space against us and released it on the invaders, only for it to evolve and come back after about half of humanity was killed!

I only eat because I’ve become a monster that needs to, but isn’t that the same as bears and lions?

>>149

Aside from the other demons, Muzan is also abusing his subordinates.

I often realize lately that pure evil is something unconscious.

>>151

I don’t think so.

Evil that is indifferent to its own malice applies to many anonymous individuals.

This kind of thing is merely childish and I don’t think of it as serious evil, just pure evil.

Once you cross a certain line, dialogue and communication become meaningless, and it comes down to having to kill.

Overall, it’s not interesting as a drama.