If it’s easy, then no one would want to do it.

Creating a year’s worth of work is too difficult…

>>6

I was wondering what I would do about my schedule if shifts were organized months in advance.

“I thought it was incredibly bothersome to talk about changing shifts every time.”

Is it on an annual basis for government offices?

Isn’t it tough to suddenly make a year’s worth all at once…?

I was surprised that you even considered a bad relationship, not just ability.

Even if there’s a bad relationship, they still have to work, so wouldn’t considering that just add unnecessary effort to scheduling?

Creating shifts is really challenging.

I never want to do it again.

Combining good people with close friends increases efficiency by 20%!

Combining bad people results in a 20% decrease…

Is there something like a game like that in reality?

>>16

Plus or minus zero! OK!

>>16

There are monsters who completely ignore communication with people they don’t like, disregard orders from above, work under their own rules, and even reprimand colleagues who don’t follow those rules, so in reality, it’s not just about 20 percent.

It’s really great to have someone who’s easy to get along with and can be used anywhere…

>>26

That’s exactly how I feel.

I may be seen as someone grateful to team up with a terrible person, but it’s stressful, so I’m thinking of quitting.

>>18

No matter who I team up with, someone with bad compatibility gets assigned automatically…

If it’s just a matter of silently processing, there might be humans who don’t talk that can be more efficient.

We also have days about once a month that look absolutely wild with the lineup.

If it’s just going to be Marius vs a few others, then it’s fine, isn’t it?

>>24

There are some jobs that can only be done if you’re a regular employee…

Isn’t the number of troubles increasing every time a new staff member joins?

It’s still okay if they just have a bad relationship.

There are shifts that are clearly only for people who can’t work.

The person in the image has a tough personality but is the type who doesn’t show it outwardly.

>>29

Well, it’s been sensed that I’m a bit annoyed…

When A and B are lined up, efficiency increases by 20%.

If we only have E-san assigned to a place where either C-san or D-san would be sufficient, the site will come to a standstill.

E-san must be assigned to either C-san or D-san (E-san can only do that).

Etc.

Matsurino is too cancerous…

If the relationship is good, it’s not impossible to improve efficiency.

If the relationship is bad, there’s nothing that can be done about the downturn.

People who are good at interacting with others generally do not express their inner feelings.

There are indeed people who are truly genuine, though they are rare.

All the managers in this workplace are enemies of the field…

>>35

The section chief seems like a nice person… but I feel like he might die from overwork someday.

>>35

A position like a managerial role is just a place to be disliked.

And then I come to know the hardships by becoming it.

>>40

Creating a common enemy tends to unite people and helps them get along, but it can also lead to being used a lot… it’s tough.

I’ve never even thought about organizing shifts based on how well people get along… Isn’t it a bit naive to say you don’t want to work with someone you don’t get along with?

>>44

There’s a discussion about who is actually running the store, right?

>>53

Is that what you mean by consideration…?

The only reliable manager is the section chief who seems likely to die from overwork.

The director does not get involved in the field, for better or for worse.

I don’t like Shirai and Ishihira-kun.

>>41

You pretended not to see the phone, right?

Isn’t it better to let AI handle it?

>>45

I honestly think it’s one effective way to make good use of it.

However, there are various restrictions when using AI at work… Huh? Are you using it personally?

Our company has started adjusting by incorporating gap part-time jobs.

I feel like things are going well for now.

Even after the years have passed since Ishihira-kun progressed to higher education, Imamura-san is still treated like a newcomer…

If a person has weak interpersonal relationships, it’s actually convenient because there are no compatibility issues.

If it’s about who likes whom or who dislikes whom, it’s complicated, but if I think I dislike everyone, then I don’t have to consider it.

Even a month makes me go “damn!” so a year is incredible…

On days when a highly skilled and strong-willed person works with someone who is not very capable but has high pride, they sometimes involve a person who acts as a buffer between the two… I’m sorry… I’m sorry… I think as I team up with them.

Because it’s a workplace with strong women.

I thought, this is exactly the kind of thing AI should do!

There aren’t any good paid software available… I wonder why?

To be brutally honest, I really have no interest in the likes or dislikes of the site or interpersonal relationships.

If you fly like that, my workload will increase by about ten times and I’ll end up dying.

I wonder if I can put it together nicely with AI or something! But then I think it’s definitely going to be a hassle to cram all the compatibility like this…

Can AI really make such considerations?

>>59

If we assign points based on how close we are, it would just become a calculation problem, so it’s not that it can’t be done.

Shift adjustments become extremely troublesome due to differences in what people can do.

As expected, it was impossible to change shifts with someone I had a bad relationship with.

I often switched to a different position as much as possible.

It seems that other departments can finish quickly if they do it mechanically, but it really becomes like a puzzle when more people are involved.

Even if you say you’ll leave it to AI, you still need to input everything like who gets along with whom…

>>63

It’s too easy compared to the effort of assembling everything, so I’ll do at least that much.

In the first place, I’m doing part-time work because I have no intention of fulfilling my own responsibility to earn.

It’s pointless to say that as an adult you shouldn’t let your likes and dislikes affect your work.

It’s just a logic puzzle, that’s all.

It is a common problem in combinatorial optimization.

It seems like AI might be good at this kind of thing, but I wonder how it actually is.

There are definitely people who are only hostile towards specific individuals, so I will take that into consideration.

If you neglect your relationships, they can suddenly break and it can lead to serious problems…

Isn’t this kind of combination problem actually really difficult for AI to handle…?

The most troublesome person is the one who wants to secure the number of working days even though they can’t do their job and are inflexible.

Nurse scheduling problem!

That’s why no one wants to become a manager…

Isn’t it only after doubling the salary?

I set it up so that the most hopeless person is entrusted to the most capable person, but when it exploded, they quit and no one could follow up, resulting in a doubling of turnover!

It turned out that way.

The current workplace offers a shift that takes into consideration my lack of harmony, and I’m really grateful because it lightly boosts my motivation.

There’s also the trap that the person who talks about the good or bad of relationships and human interactions in the workplace is the biggest cancer!

Assign work ABC to each person.

Assign abilities 123 to each person.

Assign compatibility based on each person’s ABC.

Create a variation in work efficiency by n% based on compatibility.

Include desired holidays and statutory holidays.

I wonder if I could organize it like that.

Not only in a line, but the issue of not wanting to be in front of or behind this person also arises.

Isn’t it difficult for a Turing machine because it’s an NP problem?

I try to complain, but when I look back at the shift schedule, I realize it’s only limited to just one day, and I can’t say anything.

If I don’t partner with a specific person, I can work above average.

It’s so common in manufacturing that some people really drop in performance when paired with certain individuals…

Think, don’t think, listen, don’t listen, do it voluntarily, don’t do it.

It is breaking many people.

If the size is small, throw it to the IP solver.

I have to think about things like not wanting to team up with that person or which tasks I can entrust to them, so it’s tough.

Don’t bring personal feelings into work.

When I was a pawn, I didn’t care who I was paired with.

It’s not necessarily true that the other person thought that way…

>>86

I didn’t really care about working on holidays or anything like that.

I think it must have been frustrating to realize that I was the only one they couldn’t rely on when I called the office.

It’s not that we’re fighting.

There are definitely people who are just not compatible with you at all.

>>87

There are people whose beliefs about work are completely the opposite, rather than not working at all…

Creating shifts like this is something AI is best at, right?

>>89

🤖 Anyone could just work normally, no matter who it is…

>>89

No, I think that was actually the area where computers struggled the most.

>>106

Aren’t you just changing the parameters and doing a brute force approach?

>>114

It’s because it can only be solved by brute force.

>>114

A round-robin is impossible on a computer.

Asking AI to solve it in a realistic time.

>>114

I wonder how it is for types that have too many hidden parameters.

It’s really impossible, you know? Despite having so many NGs, you want to increase the time!

If we consider parameters like bad relationships, isn’t it impossible to create a shift schedule?

>>92

So we spent just one day together, but I hope you’ll forgive me, good working.

>>92

That’s actually the punchline of that story, right?

I want to do it within a manageable range! It’s impossible!

I think it’s cute like a child who normally has their mother take away things they dislike.

Shut up, I don’t care.

Actually, just doing it for one day is really pushing hard…

This manga is a problem for the legitimate side, so that’s why I can’t say things like “it’s just the part-time lady…”

>>102

A lot of people on the non-regular side are doing this because they want to work with books…

In manufacturing, it’s easy to determine good and bad combinations by looking at production efficiency, but in tasks like customer service where quantifying results is difficult, it can be quite challenging.

Shifts adjust whether they have a bad or good relationship.

When you start thinking about that, there’s no way to help it, right?

>>104

Well, since there’s no avoiding it, it will break once and eventually settle into a form that works somehow.

Sometimes it doesn’t fit.

If you don’t consider anything at all, what will happen is that the scene will suddenly collapse and I’ll go insane.

Surrounding yourself with close friends means that the areas of expertise also tend to solidify, causing an imbalance…

But that’s okay, right?

I have experienced unnecessary meetings every month for a year due to the introduction of a system for creating nurse shifts.

In conclusion, there was nothing that could satisfy the head nurses.

The quality of a relationship can change in a day, and the very fact that we try to take it into consideration is…

Let’s have everyone submit a preference chart for everyone, and based on that, we’ll let AI create something.

Those who can’t produce shouldn’t complain!

>>112

It seems that there will be someone who can’t team up with anyone.

>>113

It’s score calculation, so no matter who you team up with, if it’s a negative, it will be the same all-purpose talent regardless of the partner.

On the day I couldn’t move at all and had to take a day off, the manager who had always had a really bad rapport with me, an aunt, said something like “You don’t have to come back anymore,” so I got angry and hung up the phone. A few hours later, I received an apology call from the owner who said, “I won’t schedule you with that person on the same days anymore.” That’s when I learned that such scheduling could be arranged…

I met someone whose partner was being called a victim because they had such a bad demeanor.

I quit because I became a victim.

It’s still better if they’re just on bad terms, but in the case of the thread image…

Because they’re incompetent and just add unnecessary work…

>>122

What is it about the shift allocation that you dislike so much…?

>>126

I’m not talking about people who are making shifts!

>>127

When you say “thread image,” that’s what happens, right?

>>135

It’s a story about someone whose resolution has been reduced, no matter how you look at it.

>>135

It’s about the person who has been made low-resolution in the thread image.

>>140

Only the blame-shifting mentality is a remarkable response of incompetence.

>>145

Matsurino, get to work.

>>143

The reason the other person doesn’t understand is not because of my explanation mistake, but because they are incompetent… I get it…

>>149

The explanation is useless because they misunderstood on their own and just got called out by everyone.

One of the top reasons for changing jobs is workplace relationships, and if I can’t stand someone anymore, there’s no choice but to quit.

Depending on the size, the optimal solution cannot realistically be obtained by either humans or computers.

It’s hard to manually achieve a score higher than the approximate solution.

>>124

So you’ll have to endure it for just one day.

It’s not really good to arrange shifts based on how well people get along, but that said, there are a certain number of people who will slack off, bully others, or cause unnecessary trouble when paired with specific individuals, so it can’t be helped.

>>125

If you team up a kind socially awkward person who takes on everything saying “I’ll handle it all” with a nameless, apathetic, incompetent slacker, it usually results in a pretty tedious situation…

It’s natural to allocate based on ability and experience, but…

It’s frustrating that emotions can sway shifts.

If you cater to the whims of someone who can adapt and get the job done, before you know it, you end up with a worthless person who only works with those who are easy to control!

Without any warning, I can’t take it anymore and will quit, but the worst case is if it detonates, so to prevent that, I will consider things to the limit.

Hey, wait! I’ve already scheduled my shifts until the end of the month, so don’t disappear at the beginning of the month!

Could you lend me the J-League schedule?

Sometimes there are dramatic days.

Well, from my personal experience, even if the relationship is bad, the efficiency doesn’t drop that much.

When the combination is good, there are times when we talk a lot during work, and the efficiency becomes terrible.

I think relationships are something to consider a bit, but they are probably not a high priority.

>>136

I hate that person! When they do that, it really puts me in a tough spot…

>>141

The priority is to get the work done first, and then, as much as possible without strain, to arrange people based on compatibility, and even if it’s not possible to be with the person you dislike every time, can you compromise to do it once or twice?

The person who lowers the resolution at the beginning of the thread image is too much of a landmine of a person, so it’s unavoidable.

By the way, is Shirai-san a science major?

>>142

I feel like I said something about being a humanities person, so I tend to be sensitive about misusing words.

Even if there is a bad relationship, I think we need to organize the shifts based on competence or experience; otherwise, it won’t work… unless there is a surplus of personnel.

It’s becoming bothersome, so forget it! I’ll just push through and keep going! If it ends up being like this day after day, it’s a bad sign, so it’s better to take a step back and calm down.

>>148

Managers who have recently come from the field tend to do this.

I get it, but management is their job, so…

You could just honestly say that you don’t know because you haven’t read the original work.

Matsurino-san has returned…

I’ve been pairing them up seriously for a while, and they really get along well! That’s the couples I’ve been using.

I felt sorry after being told before the transfer that a woman confessed to a man early on and was rejected.

I don’t want to work the same shift as someone who gets angry for no reason without knowing anything about the characters in the artwork being discussed in the thread.

A thread where the resolution of workplace bullying is increasing.

Conversely, it means that a pair of men and women who have confessed and been rejected can be expected to perform well at work…

>>158

Well, the likelihood of them focusing on their work without making strange mistakes may be higher than others…

When relationships are good, people tend to create their own unique rules or band together to act unfairly. Teamwork is necessary in the workplace, but I’m not looking for friendship.

>>159

It’s a different matter for that to happen just by being on the same shift.

Matsurino is still fine, but Utano is seriously annoying…

It’s important to endure for about a day, isn’t it?

It’s probably okay for just one more day…

I guess it’s okay for just one more day…

It’s clear that there are trash-like beings spreading debuffs just by looking at this thread.

If you’re going to assemble that as a hand, you need to team it up with someone who can suppress that trash.