A straightforward feeling.

Is it a good thing to adopt passionate laughter if cynical humor is disliked?

>>4

Kazuhiko Shimamoto…

In today’s age, it is mainstream to mock the cynical.

In other words, negative times negative.

>>5

Isn’t it just nonsensical to mock those who label others as part of the “sardonic type”?

>>17

In the end, I haven’t been able to step out of the framework of the cynical type…

Let’s get some laughter with the hot anger style.

>>6

Don’t get angry while laughing.

>>7

That’s seriously scary…

>>7

In other words, Naoto Takenaka is the opposite of a cynical type…?

Do passionate otaku really exist?

>>11

Isn’t there someone like Kazuhiko Shimamoto who embodies that very concept?

Warm anger

Having a fiery rage like flames and a cold smile like ice.

>>14

Am I becoming easy like the wind, with sadness as deep as the earth…?

>>16

Isn’t sadness just appropriate?

Usually, I can’t raise my voice, so I speak in a whisper. When pressured from the front, I feel weak, so it’s kind of a passive choice, like a sneering attitude.

>>19

A meta that laughs at the assumptions is going around.

Is the anonymous poster asking how to describe the thread image in words other than those used in a sarcastic manner?

>>22

Is it about how to express the style of taking a dominant position over the cynical types?

>>24

It’s scary how many are on social media.

There are some people who write in their profiles that they are both part of the “Inmu” community and Hikamori.

We need a fierce anger to break the world of cold laughter!

>>26

Unleash the anger of justice.

I mean, the idea that “you all are mocking the mockers!” is…

Are you aware that you are scoffing?

>>27

I don’t think so.

“You guys think I’m sarcastic and mock me based on your own assumptions and biases!”

It’s like saying that you all, not me, are the true cynical ones!

People who are making a fuss about being cynical seem to have an active impression regarding demonstrations and protest activities.

Something energetic and amazing!

>>29

There are those who scoff down on others, as well as people who think of themselves as warriors of justice, often handling criticism towards themselves in that way.

It has become a convenient concept similar to defamation and discrimination.

At the moment you accuse the other party of being sarcastic, you yourself have become tainted by sarcasm.

Is Kazuhiko Shimamoto really passionate?

>>34

Issuing indulgences too.

There are quite a few cases where people wear a victim’s face as if they are being labeled as “cold laughter types” by idiots.

There was a new genre, wasn’t there?

Don’t get involved with those who aren’t fun to be around.

If it’s a sensibility that finds it funny to mess with fools, then it can’t be helped…

I think that this type of person who wants to be cynical can usually be described with “chuunibyou.”

It’s basically something a child would do.

>>38

In that case, a response like “Hey, you’re acting like a second-year high schooler” comes flying back.

>>38

It seems to include uncles and aunts with a low or regressed mental age.

>>50

That’s disrespectful to the child.

The child just enjoys it and likes it.

Because uncles and aunts are nurturing a troublesome pride that makes them sulk if they are not seen as the ones who truly understand things by liking what they like.

An impression often used by people who do not want to acknowledge their faults.

For now, just make a sarcastic judgment like “Got you!”

It’s too trendy to feel like a win whether you’re denied or affirmed.

It feels like that thing that keeps repeating the same thing.

>>42

What I have is not a sneer, but simply a calm analysis of the facts and an objective evaluation; it’s frustrating to be labeled as a cynic.

>>45

This kind of exchange that feels like the umpteenth time is tough…

Well, I think that the “cynical type” is a category that can only exist in anonymous spaces where one doesn’t reveal their personality.

>>43

It’s because it’s someone else’s business, after all.

The concept of being objective can also just be a way of irresponsibly discussing someone else’s matters.

Since nothing is going well anyway and I can’t solve anything, it’s better not to get serious about anything.

People with disabilities like to repeat the same thing.

There are cases where a person who pours cold water on others can be perplexed even when they pour it on a spot that isn’t very hot, as well as cases where it’s obvious that they will get splashed when things are heating up.

>>49

Well, that’s true, but…

The issue is that everyone tends to think of the former when it happens to them, and the latter when they are the ones causing it.

What specifically does “sarcastic type” refer to?

The cynicism certification is quite a boomerang too.

It tends to be used with an extended meaning of something like “a person I don’t like.”

Well, it’s all the same with insults and insults.

It’s not so much a meme, but this kind of thing…

Labels that can be expressed in a single word

The meaning is gradually becoming blurred, isn’t it?

>>55

The meaning of “chi-gyu” is changing more and more, and now even hosts are being called “chi-gyu.”

>>55

On the other hand, the malice that is contained remains completely undiluted, which is troubling.

It’s distorted because they try to act like they’re different even though it’s the same kind of fight.

>>56

High DD Theory

SNS and anonymous message boards are filled with a wealth of stereotypical labels that are just mixed in like a jumble.

The concept of the DD theory is just a word used to dodge being pointed out as a conflict between two idiots.

It’s being said endlessly even though there’s no truth to it.

It’s easy to forget, including myself, but anonymous message boards are mostly a place to vent feelings and are not really a place for conversation.

There is the quality of the residents to consider, but even before that, the very nature of anonymous bulletin boards is not designed that way.

I feel like my ironic laughter is about to fall apart into chaos.

Setting aside the level of civility, SNS is still more suited for conversation.

Even on anonymous message boards, the jar is better than here.

The reason is simple: this is where anonymity is taken most seriously.

What kind of actions would be considered derisive laughter?

“You’re saying that because you’re 〇〇,” is the kind of cold laugh.

>>64

There probably isn’t anyone worth noting in a thread like this in the first place.

and so on

Normal type

“What good will it do to work so diligently?”

“It’s coldly sarcastic to say something like, ‘This project will definitely fail anyway.'”

Well, it’s used in a completely different meaning now.

The long text is desperate, isn’t it?

Is it a sneer?

>>67

Is it just provocation…?

That’s more like a desperate struggle than a sneer.

It’s probably something you say when you’re being told about yourself.

Kazuhiko Shimamoto is not passionate at all; he’s more of a self-deprecating type.

>>70

If anything, there are even those who wear the guise of hot-bloodedness while being cold and cynical.

It’s the thing called “second-year high school syndrome.”

Shimamoto interprets the act positively, so it’s not cynicism, right?

Since I recognize that a positive interpretation is a manifestation of leniency towards myself, it is accompanied by self-deprecation as well.

Is the standard response format with no name classified as a cynical type?

It’s kind of scary how people who start talking about mysterious definitions are gathering.

Whether it’s a positive or negative opinion, those who don’t respond with the same level of seriousness as the other person’s sincerity are the ones who hold a condescending attitude.

>>77

It’s only natural to be disliked for choosing not to value something that is important to the other person.

You have to be prepared for that.

I try to stay away from enthusiasm from the beginning.

It’s kind of scary, not in a sarcastic way.

Bothersome type

Glacial period system