Isn’t it just an homage as a single illustration?

Mouth, and…

They say it’s bad if plagiarism is found out, but shouldn’t we also present the original source when it comes to homage?

If you can’t be understood, then you need to communicate properly.

Even if I don’t intend to pay homage or show respect, various things from works that I liked come out within me…

Roboko was an homage to Lala…

>>10

I was masturbating to Lara during my adolescent days.

Kids these days are amazing, using robot girls to get off.

Because Doraemon is too famous, it just becomes a Doraemon format, but I wonder if there were similar things before Doraemon.

Isn’t it Goku?

I’m an alien, and my tail gets curled a lot, and my clothes often rip around the chest area.

>>17

It’s easy to understand, but it’s way too bad…

>>31

I don’t understand!

Isn’t that a joke that says you can’t even say it’s Doraemon?

Respect.

It’s a motif.

It’s inspire.

How to Sweat in Jujutsu Kaisen

>>24

Mr. Araki tends to do it without thinking!

It is a spiritual sequel.

I think I wrote that because I thought homages should be done after dedicating or pre-writing it as a preface.

The trigger was the violinist from Hamelin, and I had the impression that the part dedicated to musicians at the beginning of the comic was somehow an homage.

Oh, what kind of homage is that…

It seems that if you incorporate elements of Kamen Rider while referencing To Heart, it will become Veddagonia.

>>32

I believe that in reality, the works in the world are born from a combination of the creator’s favorite works.

Nitro tends to be quite straightforward, like Firebird and G-Robo…

I thought it was a homage to Doraemon from volume 1.

It’s a matter of degree, so it’s hard to clearly distinguish between here and here.

If you try to make a living by copying someone else’s character, it could be considered plagiarism… but I can’t say it’s not understandable.

It’s getting funny because it’s a method that’s been heavily mocked in comedy.

>>40

This is a tribute because I want it to be noticed.

>>44

A poor homage is worse than a copycat…

Huh, Doraemon has a panty slip!?

Even people said that Hikoru’s parody was a theft.

Doraemon also has service scenes, doesn’t it…

The phrase “inspired by 〇〇” that is often seen in game descriptions on Steam.

As for the current lineup of Jump series…

Doraemon → Homage → Robo Girl

Doraemon → Homage → Nico

So, Robo Girl equals Niko?

>>54

I guess it’s the latter…

>>54

It probably came out before it went into remission.

>>48

It feels like the reactions are similar to those during battles, like in a jujutsu hunter.

Is it okay to say it’s an homage, or isn’t it just a copy?

The concept of homage collapses.

>>51

It might have been a problem if the publishers were not the same.

I think that part is good.

If you’re going to steal, it would be from Shueisha, right?

The manga by O is no good because it also copied from Kodansha.

>>57

There is no legal issue.

Well, you can file a lawsuit itself (for defamation, etc.).

Recently, they annoy me by talking about AI and stuff.

Before copying and homage

Basically, many people in society don’t know that ideas are not protected by copyright.

In the first place, it’s the publisher Shueisha that copies everything.

Gintama and so on.

I like how it subtly trims parts that are slightly silhouette-focused; it’s detailed and cunning.

Parody… Homage… Inspire… Respect…

>>62

Thank you…

Gintama has many parodies, but

Toilet paper sandpaper that directly draws gag comics from erotic manga magazines is a copy.

I think “It’s okay because I like it!” is not a very good criterion for judgment… but well, there isn’t a clear standard for judgment anyway…

>>66

No matter how much the recipient side tries to be aware of the rights issues, it’s ultimately a discussion among the parties on the creator side…

It is precisely because it is a joke that can make you laugh even if you don’t know the source of the parody.

Homage is a French word that means respect.

“Pakuri” is a Japanese word that originally referred to eating in large bites, and has now come to mean stealing or similar acts.

Is it okay to say that the original inspiration for JoJo’s Stands comes from Doraemon’s secret tools?

If it’s based on an idea, it feels like “inspire” might be closer.

Someone said that it’s Lala with Doraemon and Ram-chan.

It doesn’t matter because there is no meaning in distinguishing.

is correct.

“Is it like the breathing techniques from Demon Slayer?”

>>76

I’ll carve the beat of the sun!!

>>76

As expected, the fact that breathing techniques are fundamental to martial arts cannot be called copying.

How about saying “I’m sorry, Mr. ○○” outside the frame and bringing out the character?

>>77

In the old days, there was also a skill to write “I love (famous work) so much!”

I see, I definitely didn’t notice because I’ve been mostly watching erotic stuff, but it’s Doraemon.

>>83

No, I thought it was normally Lala.

I feel like there are original sources for Araki’s work, but can we really call them homages?

If it has a unique seasoning, it’s fine.

Araki seems to think everyone knows, so there are many stand names and techniques that give off a feeling of homage.

Lara is probably like Ram-chan in terms of lineage…

If you add Doraemon, Taruru, and Tram-chan and subtract the dummy voice, it will become Lala.

The only common point is that they suddenly appeared…

>>89

A girl suddenly appeared!

Cohabitation!

Solve your problems with convenient functions!

>>99

Is that function also a common factor causing problems…?

What was often said at the time in Fan Road was that RahXephon is an homage to Eva! I think.

It seems that if you publicly declare that you have been influenced, even if the composition is not similar, it can be considered an homage.

I thought that even though it was often treated as a copycat manga, Black Cat’s Matrix is a parody…

A team of three with two men and one woman in jujutsu.

A teacher with white hair who usually acts goofy but becomes strong in battle (when serious, displays incredibly strong eyes).

It’s clearly NARUTO, but Shueisha is just pretending not to know…

It seems like a lot of followers similar to the dress have been produced.

>>93

It was safe because I had a teacher personality that was the complete opposite of Kakashi-sensei.

>>97

I wasn’t doing it as a teacher…

Araki has too many copies.

>>94

The Great Escape Too Much

Too much cannonball.

I feel that taking stand names and such from brands or artists is more uncool than stylish, even though it’s different from copying.

>>96

But if foreigners can’t use the original names in JoJo, they’ll express their feelings.

It’s like a mix of croquettes, Dragon Ball, and Hunter, divided by two.

Wuster only looks like Leorio.

>>98

Kill the Jin Freaks!

>>98

Anchovy is pretty much Frieza, huh…

To begin with, there was a feeling that it was hopeless to portray a strong gunslinger in a manga, as the range of expressions was too narrow; that was Black Cat.

This is definitely influenced by Togashi, right? (Not influenced at all)

Lala has a dragon love…

Imitation can be a form of practice, but…

The parody manga you wrote in that practice should not be released online.

I am a person who gets angry.

For now, I hadn’t thought of the idea of categorizing coming from somewhere and rolling into the house as a homage to Doraemon.

>>112

There are also tools that are helpful when brought out.

The sorcery didn’t involve the protagonist creating a doppelgänger, summoning me with a mouth seal, or adding spirals or rotating mechanisms to punches and palm strikes.

One Punch Man is an homage, but I feel it’s amazing that the original source doesn’t comment on something so blatant.

>>114

It’s not like I’m going to touch it out in the open.

>>114

I feel like it’s rare to see Anpanman comment.

>>114

Anpanman is so great that he is just one among many.

Since the customer base doesn’t overlap, there’s no particular need to comment on it.

>>114

To be honest, the name and the superhero theme only overlap slightly, and everything else is completely different.

If the protagonist in that title had been an anthropomorphized food item, it could have been risky.

The transformation scene of Diablo feels like an homage, but there are many episodes like this in the standalone stories.

If it’s interesting, it’s a parody; if it’s boring, it’s plagiarism.

I think the exact definition is probably different.

Is To LOVE-Ru a hybrid of Urusei Yatsura and Doraemon?

>>121

In the past, it was said that Ryuuren had some issues.

I don’t really know how it actually is.

>>126

It’s a good idea to search both and compare them…

If we were to comment on every ridiculous parody of Anpanman, we wouldn’t be able to keep up.

The 4-panel comic of JoJo’s Bizarre Adventure Part 6: Stone Ocean.

I want to believe that they have obtained permission, but I wonder what the truth is.

>>125

Chinese people deliberately bring out their favorite original source material exactly as is, trying to have the original creator determine the outcome, which reflects a cultural difference.

Well, there was already a kind of groundwork for that genre before Lala, and if anything, Fujiko-sensei has been fully utilizing the Doraemon format himself.

Can I criticize an author who, when asked about their favorite work, gives a random title instead of the one they’re copying, showing zero respect?

>>128

It seems like they’re declaring something that isn’t a copy to be a copy.

Is Professor Yabuki not good at creating original work from scratch?

>>130

Trouble is plenty original, right…?

If using someone else’s work as inspiration is considered plagiarism, then parody and homage are equally plagiarism, but for some reason, since it sounds bad, there’s a distinction made; it shows how sensitive humans can be.

A timid boy! A futuristic mascot! Mysterious tools! Fujiko-sensei has drawn several of them.

Does anyone know the manga where a robot comes to the house to learn about love that was published in Zero Sum a long time ago?

There are quite a few other cases besides Dora where mysterious creatures are staying.

It actually got canceled for publication because it’s at a level where it overlaps completely with the script or traces.

>>137

I’ve only heard of someone as serious as Tezuka-sensei getting really angry and going after a magazine for stealing ideas.

I wonder which installment of the Doraemon format Doraemon itself is.

I knew Robo-Ko was Doraemon, but…

I thought it was “Lala, the Star of the Universe”.

If it’s found out, it’ll be bad; if it’s copied, I want it to be found out as homage?

>>140

It’s just the readers saying it on their own, not the rights holder.

Which manga was it that had a story about Toshiba’s semiconductor factory?

I’ve heard that the reason Chinese people directly present copied works is that in their culture, not doing so is considered a lack of respect for the original material.

They say it’s not manly to disguise oneself in a way that won’t be noticed.

Speaking of which, was Matsumoto Leiji already gone?

If there were more idiots who would try to connect unrelated works like that, it might have led to a different perspective.

Is what Tezuka-sensei had really something that was stolen?

It’s the same as pornography.

It’s hard to define, but you’ll understand when you see it.

I get mad at people, but while it’s not okay, I think it’s fine to borrow compositions like in Slam Dunk, but the difficulty lies in the fact that doing so without permission is equally wrong.

>>149

Wasn’t the angry person a DB trace?

>>149

I don’t understand why one side is no good.

I remembered when Kumeida himself was extremely depressed because he didn’t realize the mistake he made when it was revealed that the character in “Zetsubou-sensei” was a copy of Doraemon.

>>150

If the person is completely unaware, isn’t that just coincidence rather than plagiarism?

>>162

Since readers in the outfield can’t judge whether it’s unintentional or not, they’ll label me as a plagiarist.

So someone in the editing department needs to check it.

To be honest, the fact that the basketball scene in the romance manga was traced is an overreaction from Kodansha to make it out of print…

>>151

Even Slam Dunk was traced from basketball magazines…

>>157

It’s definitely out, but it might be correct to say that there was a time when the collective knowledge of the internet was not prevalent…

Even now, it’s not uncommon for works that have been selected to be pointed out for plagiarism only after they have been made public.

>>151

I think tracing is definitely not okay because it falls under direct reproduction of copyrighted material, unlike a parody homage.

Something that cannot be excused.

>>158

That Slam Dunk was like a joke, being a plagiarism of professional photos.

I wonder if it’s really necessary to hit the black cat that much now.

I feel like it’s being transformed into something quite original.

And don’t say that the Slam Dunk was a trespass.

What people who judge like are just works that are parodies or homages, right?

If you dislike it, just copy it.

The author of Fire Force suddenly started claiming that Promare is a copy, and at first, I thought the author had finally gone crazy, but after looking into the background, it turned out that Promare had quite a bit of overlap.

Inspiration and respect are characterized by the act of the creators openly stating that they referenced the subject!

If tracing is a crime, then it would be strange if that person or that person wasn’t banned from the industry, but they’re still releasing art books as professional illustrators.

Both the author and the rights holder rarely take action because it requires a lot of effort and money, and they are often portrayed as the bad guys.

I think it’s really a subjective matter that can be called an homage if the person themselves says it is.

Looking back now, I feel sorry for the Cross Hunters too.

It was unfortunate that it was treated as a copy because it was based on The Matrix.

I like Jiro-inspired.

I don’t really care, but there are guys like the “Daisuki Hold Uncle.”

I couldn’t help but laugh at what was bubbling up here.

It seems like Cross Hunter has been receiving unnecessary hatred since it continued serialization while other manga were canceled.

>>175

It’s pitiful that people who have been tossed around have come to know about those internal circumstances.

>>176

I think that’s ultimately Mr. Obari’s values, and it shouldn’t be generalized.

>>185

Well, just because there are people who dislike it, it’s not something that can be generalized that copying is bad.

>>189

Is that really the case…?

>>176

It’s hard not to voice my concerns when Ohaba is taking on new challenges with Brave Burn and Tomino is working on G-Reco, while others are just toying around with much older works.

>>188

New challenge??????????

If the work is great and the author is respected enough to be called a teacher, then imitation is recognized as homage, so it’s a problem that the results haven’t been achieved.

The difference between homage and parody is ambiguous, so if it’s a gag, let’s just call it a parody, and anything else an homage?

The cross hunter is doing it to the extent that there’s no excuse, so it’s no good.

I like the JoJo homage elements in Demon Slayer.

I don’t know how Mr. Araki feels about it…

It feels like Hunter x Hunter is somehow being permitted.

From a copyright perspective, it is not something that a third party can act upon.

It’s important to properly uphold justice between the parties involved…

Food is very inspiring, but I can’t really think of much in other genres.

Since the time of Tezuka and Disney, they have been copying each other, and even though it’s a crime that requires a complaint, it’s just anonymous people who want to bash works they dislike using copying as a stick to hit with.

It’s rarer to find works without any imitation.

>>187

With that kind of story, I wonder which came first, Jungle Emperor or The Lion King.

>>196

Bambi goes first.

>>187

Creating without any influence is impossible, and it’s actually more relaxed than I thought…

Works that are actually subject to legal action become levels of plagiarism or piracy that don’t even enter discussions of imitation versus homage.

Well, when it comes to Disney, they’re being sued over Moana for stealing from sources other than Tezuka, so this isn’t just a simple matter.

It’s quite brazen how they’re blatantly copying the portions from the six judges…

It’s not up to the readers or users to decide; it’s determined by the rights holders.

On top of that, a person from another company did such a thing.

If you state it clearly, then I can only say that’s a bit…

Is something like the Phantom Troupe from Black Cat a copy?

Wasn’t Moana 2 currently in a lawsuit for directly copying the script plot?

Even if we’re talking about how copying and parody are different, if you find it unsatisfactory, it will just come back to “it’s copying,” and the conversation can’t progress.

It has now become a matter of feelings.