Classes of FGO
There are various advantageous and disadvantageous attributes in rock-paper-scissors, but it’s quite rare to encounter something completely different.

Whip attribute
In the Castlevania game, the physical attack types were “Whip, Slash, Blunt.”

Fairy

Water Attribute
In the context of the game, the sea is treated as a sacred entity, so what would be referred to as light or holy in other games corresponds to this sea attribute.

Beauty

Quantum, flames, ice, thunder, and wind are all physics, aren’t they?

In Megaten, the status abnormalities are divided into “mental type” and “physical type,” and I couldn’t tell which is which.
Sleep and charm are mental…? Paralysis is physical…?

Old

A game that features elemental attributes like fire and water, as well as metal attributes such as copper and others.

Love

The game in the image is extremely difficult if you don’t match attributes, and even though it has that aspect, it doesn’t necessarily become that advantageous, making mixed teams the norm, which is really tough.

What was it called? A game like Secret of Mana that has a ton of attributes.

Smile

Isn’t it fine if imaginary numbers are just like light?

I don’t think it’s a property, but I think the types in Yu-Gi-Oh are really bizarre.

It’s a discussion about attributes, or rather attribute compatibility, but I never know who the Soul’s bleeding attribute is going to affect each time.
It’s fine if it works on humans and beasts but not on golems, but do the undead have rotten blood flowing through them?
Are the plant types flowing with sap? For those in armor, isn’t it hard to tell from their appearance whether they are living beings or undead?

It feels like the attribute of Yu-Gi-Oh, due to the game and the hippocampus, is mostly on the enemy side.

Symphogear XD

Regarding attribute compatibility, I still remember that it was said in the game that fire → water → earth → wind is a secret.
Fire is strong against water… and that’s how it goes.

The magic attribute that was in something like RPG Maker is confusing.

Metal element of the Five Elements.

Despite being a series that has been going on for such a long time, I still completely don’t understand the dragon element in Monster Hunter.

I haven’t done it, but Last Rebellion.
In the end, I like the punchline that it’s better to hit with physics.

The five elements don’t mean that you can manipulate metal just because it’s metal.
It’s the kind of thing that can handle all concepts symbolized by money.
Well, I don’t actually know any games that use that.

Water → Strengthening → Engraving

Elegant
Cute
Pure
Sexy
Cool

If there are too many attributes, players won’t be able to keep up if they are functioning properly.
It’ll just become a mere flavor.
I think about three or four would be good.

Blade, Beast, Beauty

Pokemon types
I can’t remember at all…

Supernatural Biological Machines

Late MHF’s status attributes like “Musical” and “Celestial” attributes are multi-attributes.

Sea Dragon Tribe
Aquarium
Fish species

Faith Civilization Spirit

Symphogear was really complicated.

I still can’t understand why Rock and Ground types in Pokémon are separated.

Flame, Ice, Thunder, Wind, Earth, Water, Holy, Darkness
Nuclear thermal quantum ion hadron terranano eternal extinction

Why is it ice instead of water there…

Bullying

I didn’t really get the higher attributes of Monster Girl Quest.
Physics → Hell, Light → Eternity, Wind → Hadron

Attribute of performance
Resonance Attribute

It can be slightly difficult to distinguish between shoumetsu and shounen when they are in the same game.

MBCVA

Feng Shui was complicated, but I’ve remembered it now.

Flame, Ice, Gale, Earthquake
Nuclear heat, shock, gravity, electric shock
Curse Kill, Nerve, Awakening, Demon Exorcism
Demon-slaying, divine revelation, blessing, miracle

Magic Power, Nerve, Spirit!
Which is which!?

Crab attribute

I think it’s quite unusual that Rock and Ground types are separated in Pokémon.

Flame Ice Thunder Light Darkness Copper Sword Copper Arrow Copper Axe Iron Sword Iron Arrow Iron Axe Silver Sword Silver Arrow Silver Axe Mithril Sword Mithril Arrow Mithril Axe Adamant Sword Adamant Arrow Adamant Axe
By the way, physical attacks are the strongest, so I won’t use any of these attributes.

Foolish attribute
Frozen tuna and chikuwa are attached to gag weapons.
It’s interesting that gag characters can have special effects.

Compatibility doesn’t stick in memory.
Dolphin Wave

Power
Know
Smile

Kinetic, intense heat, condensation
Conduction, diffraction, extinction
I can’t remember it easily.
Wind Fire Water
Thunder Light Darkness
That’s fine, right?

I have not understood Pokémon for a long time.
I experienced my first setback after becoming an adult and starting to engage with games.

The beauty attribute of Majibake.

Looking back now, it doesn’t seem strange.
When it comes to attributes in games, I’ve mostly encountered elemental ones.
When I first saw slashing and piercing destruction, I didn’t quite get it.

“Altria face”

I understand the lower attack (attack from below).
I don’t understand the middle section (attack from above)…

I understand fire, ice, and thunder, but…
Aren’t wind and earth basically slashing or striking attacks?

People often say that you’ll learn the combos in FF11 just by playing, but I still don’t understand them at all.
I only know that it becomes the route I often use.

Pokémon’s Psychic types still get mixed up.
Even though I learned about fairies,

True Attribute
Good attribute
Beauty attribute

I think Pokémon can be quite a trap.
The wind attribute is ineffective against the lightning attribute.

When it comes to a situation where it’s faster to just hit with this character regardless of their weakness attribute, the game tends to break.

There is a foolish attribute in ruina, and I found it somewhat bothersome that it was quite strong.

The five elements’ mutual restraining can get messy if you have Pokémon type matchups stuck in your head…

FF12 oil

Well, the only time I have trouble with Pokémon is against completely unfamiliar opponents, but after battling once, it will show the type matchups…
Well, for things like 4x weaknesses and 25% resistances, you’ll just have to learn them on your own.

“Would you really split things up that finely even at the point of Dragon Quest’s flames, heat, and explosions?”

Well, in the old Dragon Quest, there were only resistances and no weaknesses.
It’s probably not the case now, right?

Is it Digimon?
There was that attribute of filth or poop, right?

In Dragon Quest 3, the elemental weaknesses are incredibly important, so you’ll struggle if you don’t memorize them.
It was really difficult to have to guess and memorize the damage values based on effects that can’t be inferred from appearance and that weren’t recorded.

Thought
Strong against non-elemental but weak against psychic element.

Dawn attribute and moonbow attribute
It’s an important word in the story, after all.

Miracle of the Zone’s shell attribute
It’s important because it’s the Great Sea Monster Story.

If we talk about something strange, it’s the physical attributes.

I can understand the concept of no attribute.
No-attribute resistance makes no sense at all.

Because I’m brain-muscle type, I end up choosing characters with all 1.5 for attack and defense.

Electric shock, poison, acid, cold air, flame, plasma, water flow, flash, darkness, fragments, thunderous sound, confusion, force, slowing, pure magical power, meteor, extreme cold, chaos, hell, degradation, causal confusion, time reversal, gravity.
They’re all attributes found in one game.

Civilization, spirit, faith, void, hard, soul, omnipotent, creation

What is a normal type?

Physical damage and magic damage in LoL
It’s not that the name is strange, but the classification only takes into account the convenience of the game.
The old man’s body slam is insane, dealing magical damage.

Heaven attribute
Time Attribute
Illusion Attribute

I don’t understand the attributes in Dragon Quest at all.
What is a rock type?
I understand that the rock smash is a rock-type move, but why are moves like power-up punch and rain dance also rock-type?

I don’t quite understand the versatility of Atlas.
I don’t really understand why FF’s Gravira deals percentage damage.

The Magna Carta had some strange attribute, but I forgot what it was.

The attributes of the digital war are memorable.

The golden sun had an indescribable elemental affinity of fire⇄water and earth⇄wind.

It’s not just the attributes themselves, but…
I want you to spare me from the inconsistent treatment of those with multiple attributes.
“It will be judged based on the weaker side, so it’s strong.”
“If there was resistance to either one, the damage decreases.”
“Let’s unify it by taking the average.”

Violence👊

What does the mutual strong attribute between each other make players do?

Mahjong tiles

Nuclear heat

Time Attribute and Space Attribute

Gira is busy being lightning, fire, and light.

The composite attribute just needs to reference the favorable attribute.

There was a rock-paper-scissors system of machine → magic → sorcery → machine in Kemco’s i-appli game.

I’m more interested in the position of anger and despair than the new attribute.

Fire, Water, Thunder, Light, and after Darkness, the God attribute.

It’s common to see games that are clearly influenced by the three elemental types of Pokémon: fire, water, and grass.
The sword, spear, and axe of FE are represented by red, blue, and green icons.
It’s actually easy to understand.

In Ogre Battle, fire and water, wind and earth, light and darkness had mutual weaknesses.

Pokémon learn not based on compatibility, but it’s easiest to learn for each individual Pokémon.

Isn’t it Eushully? It’s at a level where I don’t understand the meaning.

It might have been good to combine Fire and Blaze in line with the fact that Hyado→Hyadarco changes the target range to a group.

It feels like a species effectiveness in PSO’s NAMD.

It’s hard to notice that the compatibility of Ghost and Steel types has subtly changed due to the addition of new types in Pokémon.

Saint and Sacred Law

The origin of Eternia and the time I first thought of it.

Do we really need to categorize things into fire, heat, water, ice, earth, rock, star, light, negative, darkness? Similar attributes keep popping up.
And about half of the subdivided attributes have only one or two corresponding spells.

The separation of red, blue, and green is derived from the three primary colors of light, not from Pokémon…

Since Pokémon was the basis for type matchups, it was quite a culture shock to see something like how electricity is weak against water in Gauss.

Pokémon seems complex, and in reality, it is complex.
At that time, it seemed like other RPGs had undisclosed affinities set individually for each monster, so it felt more organized.

Fire, Ice, Thunder, Light, Darkness, Copper Axe, Copper Arrow, Copper Sword, Iron Axe, Iron Arrow, Iron Sword, Silver Axe, Silver Arrow, Silver Sword, Mithril Axe, Mithril Arrow, Mithril Sword, Adamant Axe, Adamant Arrow, Adamant Sword
*All attributes*

I bet there are people who would be surprised to use a ghost move on Giratina.

The magic book that the protagonist acquired is something special, and in the introduction of the game, the protagonist’s attribute was death.
But it was a situation where their main enemy had a weakness exploited by fire, which was the main attribute of that enemy, and there was also a crazy guy on the enemy side who used death attributes.

SD Gundam was unique with its power attribute, technique attribute, and magic attribute.
It’s just a rephrasing of rock-paper-scissors that was in Carddass.

I remember that Wild Arms was really hard to understand.

I find it more troublesome when the attribute compatibility correction is not a uniform value rather than having many attributes.

I can’t even imagine the weaknesses of the demons in Megaten or how they look outside of angels and demons…

While including biological elements in a normal way, it also contains bird elements in flight, and there are many birds that are not flying types.

I’ve thought for a long time that doubling damage from weaknesses in Pokémon is a bit too simplistic.
Well, that might be easy to understand in its own way.
If it’s 1.5 times, it would become a game of base stats, huh?

Drill attribute
It is literally assigned to drill-type magic.

The elemental reactions in Genshin Impact were interesting, but is there any other game where attributes have significance?

Old games often had monsters that looked like the same fire type, but some were weak to water while others were weak to earth.

Earthworm’s weakness is Ground: there are some with the ability Ground Color that are immune to Ground.
In the end, the only way is to remember each Pokémon as knowledge…

Civilization → Spirit → Faith → Civilization

Wasn’t the first generation of Pokémon also something you could figure out just by looking at them…?
It’s not listed in the encyclopedia either.
When was it visualized?

I remember that Bug-type moves are doubled against Hassam because of its Earthquake, but the Ground-type damage being halved is quite puzzling.

The fact that insects are strong against evil is too much like a special effects hero context.

Showa attributes, Heisei attributes, Reiwa attributes

You can guess from the appearance, but if you use a technique, it should be exceptional, or maybe not quite there?

Even now, you should be able to gauge someone you’ve never seen before just by their appearance.
Once you fight, the compatibility will be displayed.

In the first generation of Pokemon, you can see the type when you catch them!

Wasn’t the compatibility part of Dragon Quest still all masked data?

The “In-Bound Persona” had a lot of unnecessary attributes.
In addition to Hammamdo, there’s also Eihakouha.

The “Eihakouha” deals damage while “Hamamudo” causes instant death, but wasn’t it the same in terms of weaknesses?

Personally, the work I have found least convincing recently is the standard attributes of Soul.
Because there are striking, thrusting, and slashing attacks, what does that mean?

On the contrary, I feel that non-strange attributes like fire and flame attributes are present in almost all games with the concept of attributes.

I can only think of one piece of content that has been so privatized as to make the era name an attribute.

The handling of non-elemental attacks varies by game, doesn’t it?
It might just be a regular attack or an universal attribute that isn’t affected by elemental compatibility.

It’s because of the original, but I think the Starlight Review games are also quite impressive for men.

Gravity

If you throw a rock, that’s already physics.

In Megaten, individual resistances are set somewhat arbitrarily, and there isn’t much of a rock-paper-scissors dynamic, so it’s easy to increase attributes carelessly.

Pokemon

The World Tree usually has attributes attached to most attacks.
I think it’s quite unique to say to hit someone with no attributes if they have all the resistances.

If I think too much about this, I’ll end up launching rocks and considering it a 50:50 between soil strikes… so I have to compromise somewhere.

Undead tribe
What the heck is an undead?

The thunder attribute, which is different from the lightning attribute in D&D.
In the original language, it’s Lightning and Thunder, but is that different…?

Breast, butt, vagina attributes

Causal confusion

TS attribute attack

It’s fine to have many attributes, but I hope it’s simply based on whether they are strong or weak, rather than using a rock-paper-scissors system.

I would like to limit the attributes to about six.

It’s a good game where you can do bad things with composite attributes.
A game that becomes terrible if you get caught by any of the composite attributes is a bad game.

It feels like water and ice, or wind and electricity, are sometimes separate and sometimes grouped together, about half and half.
I wonder which one is actually better.