That’s a relief.

Is there a reward if I rank up two levels every time?

That was close, I was saved by getting to Hyper Ball 4.

>>4

Not really a big help, you know.

From Hyper 3, huh?

I feel like it’s good because you can have a lot of fun and finish by reaching mastery.

I thought it might not be bad, right?

Does that mean that if you go to Super 1 once, you’ll receive 50 hourglasses every month without doing anything else?

>>8

Even if you’re not interested in ranked matches, you can get passive income just by doing it once.

>>10

It’s probably going to change because it’s too favorable for the users.

Isn’t the gap in effort between going to the master’s this month and going to the master’s next month too big?

Is the drop of 2 ranks similar to the original?

The number of matches required is not even comparable.

If I get 1675 points, will I still be considered a top master even if I’m ranked outside?

>>13

Isn’t it set there because the current 1000th place border is there?

>>14

I guess they wanted to decide the distribution amount based on the number of active participants and the status of their summits.

Most serious players will probably stop after reaching Master, and it feels like the real competition starts from Hyper 3.

It’s fine because I won’t do it anymore.

>>18

There is no particular issue since the difference in the number of hourglasses distributed among others will just continue to widen.

I should probably do it soon.

I haven’t played a single match since going to Haibo last month.

It seems realistic to aim for the master level every month starting from Hyper 3.

Well, I think that’s generally true, but I wonder if there are already so many people who can’t get the Pokéball emblem anymore.

>>23

As expected, the lower-level emblem might just give everything away.

>>28

This game will become amazing with that emblem!

It’s just about 4 packs worth, after all.

I don’t know about the environment, but is it okay to just have two Giratina?

>>25

If you can stack more, it will be more stable.

I want to pull Nanjamo AR.

And I want to share it with my friends and make them happy.

I don’t care about myself! I just want to make my friend happy…

>>29

The Nanjamo AR will not appear for those who lie to themselves.

Honestly, I can’t imagine myself still doing this six months from now.

Since it’s not linked, I want to sell the account if it can be sold, but I wonder if that’s possible.

If it’s about raising by two ranks, it’s an enjoyable goal within reach.

If someone were to say “again, from a Poké Ball,” I would definitely feel like the number of matches is excessive!

It seems that when looking at overseas interviews and game sites, they are planning to offer card rewards in ranked matches as well, so I guess I’ll go that far…

>>33

Rather, at first I thought they were being considerate by not including card rewards in ranked matches…

It says that you can get the emblem upon reaching it, so I’m using the one with the best design, the Monster Ball, but if you’re getting them all, then that’s a different story.

You hate Thai people, yet you are playing a Thai game?

>>35

It’s fun even if I don’t do it.

Furthermore, ranked matches are something that people who enjoy them primarily engage in, right?

The environment of Masubo is so proper that it’s hard to believe it hasn’t even been half a year since it started operating.

It feels like there are multiple rogues in a beautiful triangle formation.

This in itself is fine, but please add a winning streak bonus to Hyper as well.

As expected, the number of required matches is too many.

>>42

If you feel it’s tough, then it’s perfectly fine to say that a hyper stop is appropriate for you.

If you’re not good with people, you should just enjoy your collection as much as you like and not bother getting into the conversation about ranked matches.

People who dislike interacting with others can’t do that, you know.

There’s a rough-looking Moltres.

This time I started as a beginner, so it took 331 battles to reach Master Ball, but if I start from Hyper, I think I can get there in about half the time.

Is 200 necessary?

With only Polygon Z left, I’ll complete the fierce battle ones.

>>47

I wanted to trade if it were nighttime.

Super 3 → Hyper 1

I think a repetition of around that is the most efficient in a grading system based on points.

From Hyper 3, it’s within the acceptable range.

If it were from Hyper 1, I would be furious.

When I see people exchanging 2-star trainers, I think that’s some serious determination.

How much does that cost?

I thought I would have to start from Hyper 1, so starting from 3 is quite generous.

I want to keep playing after I reach Master Ball, so please remove the demotion from Master Ball.

>>51

If you want to play, I guess it means to either do random matches or play in a private lobby.

>>52

I want you to stop displaying the rank match rate in random matches because it’s embarrassing…

I’m not really into cards I don’t use in the deck, so I’m feeling hesitant about opening Shining High.

However, drawing a Charizard with the goal of getting Natsume AR is somewhat… somewhat…!

>>53

The byproduct Resafinashe has some trade value, so if you want it, it might just be bearable to peel it.

I prefer collecting, and I don’t dislike battles, but I’m not interested in ranked matches. If I can get five consecutive wins and a promotional battle event, then I’ll randomly play the rest on my own.

I feel like they should stop using the allocation of sand timers from ranked matches for regular events.

For now, let’s try our best to raise it to Super 1…

With 50 hourglasses, I can’t even unwrap 5 packs, let alone 10 pulls.

>>56

Next, there will be a sandglass exchange, and with the 4 sandglasses from the login mission, that’s a total of 120! Combining them means a 10-pull!

>>59

It’s a pain to deal with the loading partner, but since I have a ton of hourglasses lying around by myself, I have to do it.

>>56

If you wait 11 hours for each pack, you can unwrap 50 packs!

I hope they don’t limit the designs to rank matches, even if it’s just distributing packs normally.

If you keep unwrapping the Riza Pack, you’ll end up getting AR Natsume for free.

Reaching master level is just the right goal to set.

It’s a bit boring if I quickly finish around 5 consecutive wins, and achieving rank 1000 is just too much of a struggle.

It seemed like I would stop at Hyper 2, but it’s a hassle to drop to Super, so I’ll try to stick with Hyper 3.

I’ve become a Spabo 1, so now it’s all leisurely and carefree with passive income.

If they do something like a cute Gardevoir or Meowscarada limited illustration card as a reward for the top ranks in ranked matches, it would definitely make a lot of people go all out in trying to reach the top.

>>66

I’m astonished before that.

There is a possibility of distributing hourglasses in an event like a solo battle for the release of a new card set.

If you consider that a 1000 yen premium has a value of over 3600 hourglasses worth in a month +α, well…

I think that those who talk loudly are not actually that many.

I like to do things quietly by myself.

The CPU occasionally crashes too.

>>70

Do you like the solo drop event task of winning 20 times? I don’t like it.

>>79

Well, it can be done automatically…

To be honest, you can reach Master if you win 50% of the time, so it’s within a realistic range.

It feels like it would be too easy of a game once the winning streak adjustment kicks in.

>>71

If it’s exactly 50%, how many matches can I go to Master…?

>>71

If only the excessive number of matches required could be corrected.

>>78

That’s part of the passion for the game and the rank, isn’t it?

It’s okay to stop as long as you’re not forcing yourself.

If it was an emblem like a Premier Ball instead of a Master Ball, I might have worked harder.

Isn’t it just right for a different version of the doctor’s drawing?

Please don’t make it 1000th place for the Masubo distribution…

Watching the streams of people aiming for master rank looks really tough.

>>76

A higher value needs to be about that much.

>>76

Seeing that it’s been going on for 12 hours and it’s fluctuating around ±10 makes you go “wow…” doesn’t it?

I laughed when I was told that it’s the same as staring at the floor for 12 hours.

It’s fine for this kind of game to be lukewarm.

I’ve been slacking off and now I’ve reached rank high 4.

It’s long~

If you want to compete in ranked matches that aren’t forced, it wouldn’t make sense if it’s too easy.

It’s not related, but the peeping challenge is until 14:59 today.

>>88

It’s over…

>>88

It’s a challenge for the peeking challenge, right?

Please come back after successfully completing a 100% peeping challenge.

>>88

Since AR Nijamomo let me draw, I forgave everything.

>>88

I was getting sucked into the hourglass a lot, so this is a relief…

>>88

I played about five times and got one Lucario EX, so that’s good enough.

>>88

The peek is not guaranteed, and furthermore, the cards I want are not flowing in at all.

What was this event about…

>>88

In the end, it was utterly useless, and it was such a nonsensical event that it would have been better if it hadn’t happened at all.

>>88

I contacted them to address the issue of not having any desirable packs flowing in for getting it.

The task of winning 20 times will finish on its own if you just leave it, so they’re just giving you extra tickets.

I cannot tolerate being at a lower compatibility level.

Is this okay?

>>96

If you’re going to apply it, at least show me the number of battles!?

It’s a game where collecting cards is easy, so it’s been serious battles since the level of Poké Balls.

There’s not much difference in playing ability.

I’ve gotten to Hyper 3, but I don’t think I’ll go for Master Ball.

With a win rate of 50%, you can’t reach hyper even after 100 matches.

I feel that the value corresponding to realistic boundaries and suffering is convincing when a master player shows me their deck.

It seems that “wow” might come before “awesome” for top players.

The mission with the two EX characters was tough in a subtle way, so I was helped by the peeking.

I mean, don’t make stuff like this.

The name is also a bit too random already.

Woohoo!

>>105

What came out?

Somehow, I keep running into Tridep.

It felt like a 50% occurrence of peeping.

It’s a loss as soon as you engage with someone who’s trying to provoke you.

>>109

I don’t need that kind of thing.

I became distrustful of Getchare after removing all EX.

>>110

On the contrary, you haven’t had it until now…

>>110

20%

Drop pack with probability

Gatchare occurs with a probability.

Peeking occurs by chance.

It’s a crazy game where everything is based on probability, and despite being a special event, nothing is guaranteed.

>>112

It’s a bit late now for a game where the win rate for going second exceeds 70%.

>>121

Nothing we talked about is connected, you idiot.

>>124

It seems like I’m going to lose to Alex.

I’m glad there was a winning streak adjustment.

I’m almost at master rank, but it seems like I’m just facing a bunch of Gira Dark players close to the points.

So on the contrary, when I brought out the mass speed, I came down to 30 points left.

I don’t know what Gyarados is or anything, but it’s extinct.

Open this…

Oppai…

Open…

Welcome!!

>>117

I’m glad the rental deck is completed.

It seems like there are quite a few people who haven’t actually gone to the Master Ball tier…

>>118

In the first place, there’s really not much value in going there as an ordinary player.

>>118

It’s still the 10th, but for you, going to Master Ball is almost normal; you’re a bit crazy.

Yes

Since the bot battles are around 10 to 15 matches, it’s about 57% or so?

It’s fine without a winning streak adjustment, but the high bonus requires too many points.

I can’t take it anymore at the supermarket ~ I can’t handle it ~

Just Gyarados isn’t enough, huh?

I’ve only gotten one color variant so far, and it has a star rating of two. Is it really about 4% to get one that matches?

I wish they wouldn’t do color variation packs anymore.

“Honestly, it’s not that exciting just because there are cards for ‘shiny Pokémon’ existing separately…”

I like the card itself; it’s quite nice.

>>133

The frame is nice and pretty.

I also like the sound when it comes out.

That’s it.

>>133

Well, that’s how it is from the original source, right?

>>133

I think it’s about once every six months.

Thanks to peeking, I was able to get a 2-star, so I like this event.

>>134

I hate this event because there was never even a star 2 coming in before I started peeking, and nothing resulted from it.

It’s just that those who can go to the Masuda can go, and those who can’t, can’t.

How is the Ocean-themed deck?

>>140

Strong when used by the enemy.

In the end, I didn’t get a single AR training card during the peeking challenge period…

>>141

I checked more frequently than usual, but there were no occurrences of the four consumption.

Normally, I only check it about twice a day.

>>141

I didn’t see ☆2, but I’m grateful I was able to pull quite a few of ◇3 and ◇4, which I didn’t have.

The last update time is one thing, but if you’re posting a record with a win rate of 60%, then you can’t claim that a win rate of 50% easily reaches Master Ball.

>>137

This is probably normal.

Those who are provoking with airplay aren’t going to show their rank image?

>>145

It’s obvious that you can’t deliver since you haven’t been doing it properly, right!?

>>146

I don’t understand why the ranking opens and shows old displays.

The ranking update can only be pressed once every hour.

>>146

In other words, if I update now and have the same record, it means I can prove it…

I don’t dislike it, but it’s sad that the ☆2 rainbow slot has disappeared instead.

Basically, the best illustration is there.

>>147

I think the fact that a special pack mixed with different colors won’t flow into the catch raid is the worst feature.

I like the battles in the game itself, but I dislike ranked matches because people like this get energized.

It seems that the real airplayers have been found.

Spears are just too creepy when they’re a different color.

I got a regular 2-star, so I’ll use that one.

It’s a combination of Pokémon and card games, you know?

The security is still pretty good.

>>162

I think it’s fine because for those who can’t do it, the rank at the end was just the goal.

Oh… wow… it’s something divine…

Well, just having the option to peek significantly increases the probability of pulling.

It’s like the Monty Hall problem.

>>164

Raise your hands!! It’s the Monty Hall problem police!!!!

>>164

It will be essentially 40%.

If it occurs, it’s quite a bargain.

In the future, it seems like there will be about three different colored ones each time.

It’s not something like the Monty Hall problem.

I understand the intention.

Ranking and things like that are definitely heavy processing tasks.

Most users do not care about it.

But the kind of guy I talk about here is the one who’s bothered and insults with curses.

I think it’s also crap.

Just made it in time.

Even if you post your rank on a worthless message board like this, it will only lead to this kind of fruitless development.

If we’re doing it Monty Hall style, we have to open all the losing options except the one you chose.

As a result of spending over 30,000 yen to get a colored lizard.

The only ones that can be called top rare are Nanjamo and Spearow, but they haven’t appeared yet.

How much money are people who have AR trainers and a full set of Poké Balls spending?

>>177

That’s the way life is.

>>177

There are people who fail due to such trivial pride, aren’t there?

>>177

The moment you provoke others

There are a lot of theme collections that feel like they just set up the evolution route of the current pack, and I find that pretty dull.

I missed the chance to peek, and when I dropped the app, it automatically selected for me.

I didn’t know that.

If it’s Monty Hall, the users would be even happier!

It wasn’t bad, but I think the peeping chance was still confusing.

You’re using a straw man argument to claim that you picked it up.

Even though the winning rate is 60%, can you explain how you can say it’s fine with a 50% winning rate?

The usage rate is higher than I thought, and the people who were mocking have gone quiet, haven’t they?