
It’s just about using it as a shield for the meat. Sending troops one after another sounds good, but in the end, it was just a sequential deployment of forces… Well, it’s just dividing the magical cavalry and troops into smaller groups. I see, that’s what it means… I don’t know the word for sequential deployment… Of course, there are times when that’s effective.
Nipple piercing
It’s the worst…
It’s not just about throwing all your forces at once, but sequential deployment is often portrayed as a symbol of folly.
>>3The side that is acted upon tends to win easily, while the side that acts often loses.
>>3It’s not just a matter of whether to deploy all forces at once or gradually.
There are 100 people in total, and instead of sending all 100 at once or sending one person at a time, it’s about assessing that 50 people are needed and sending them accordingly.
>>9That’s the job of a strategist.
That’s a high hurdle, isn’t it?!
>>3It’s not about throwing all forces in; it’s also the commander’s job to assess the appropriate level of force to deploy.
It means that if you keep throwing in your forces multiple times, it means you can’t make that judgment.
Like Hojo-san, who kept adding little bits of miso soup when making cat food.
>>3Vertical combat is also gradually being introduced, isn’t it?
It seems that if you try to launch a wave attack and fail, it will become a gradual deployment.
“Emergency attack… huh?”
I can’t beat 100, but…
If it’s 10 times 10, I can win depending on the situation.
A strategy is called a plan to create a situation where you can send in 100.
It is said that if you don’t think about anything, it will only lead to sequential input.
As a first-year adventurer, you probably aren’t used to terms like “sequential deployment” or “nipple areola.”
>>11I don’t think I’ll be listening to the latter even after 10 years…
“The look that says ‘this child doesn’t understand’ is nice.”
>>12The older sister who can see through and break it down for me is so kind…
When watching Year One, it’s heartwarming to see that almost everything Goblin Slayer says in the future is just a repeat of what he has already learned.
>>15How do you see it? The older sister elf’s look is really nice, isn’t it…?
It helps with the explanation.
It reminds me that I am just a country boy.
In cases where you sequentially invest and end up losing, it’s likely that you weren’t thinking of sending the next one if it was doomed from the start…
>>18At first, I thought it would work, but as a result, it’s a wonderful strategy that reduces our fighting strength.
I am throwing myself into a fierce battle, but I remain a boy on the inside.
Before the thread image, I saved the world without realizing it, so now it’s just study, study, study under my sisters.
Sequential input seems bad! It’s often portrayed that way! But
It’s basically the same as continuing to throw money into pachinko or gacha when you feel like you’re almost going to win, so it’s probably not a good thing.
>>23It’s true that it’s not good, but the comparison with those is quite different, right?
>>23Isn’t that an all-in?
Sequential deployment is indeed a foolish strategy, but if one could easily calculate the appropriate troop strength, no one would struggle.
>>24It’s a condition that can only be achieved in a game where you can overview and see everything from the total number of enemies to their movements.
>>27It becomes clear that in military strategy, information is vital.
>>24I know I shouldn’t do it, but there are many situations where it seems like the only way to maintain the front line is to gradually introduce forces…
>>31In the absence of bases such as forts.
First of all, there is the factor that the places where large-scale battles like war stories can take place are limited.
If I can only fight there, then I have no choice but to do my best there, so sometimes I take it slow and steady.
If we can’t retreat even if we want to, we have no choice but to call for reinforcements to maintain the front and buy time to avoid collapse.
It’s not always the case that you’re doing something because you want to.
It was not a handsome guy, but a sister.
>>26Year One is the story of a young novice being guided by caring older women until he becomes a Goblin Slayer.
The thread image is probably based on Bazett from Fate.
The pattern of losing while trying to minimize to the necessary minimum is sequential input.
It tends to feel strange to lose after sending this much.
Sen-senijika…
I see, so that’s what you mean…
Did you not study Japanese at that creepy master’s place?
>>35That master only taught me to think on my feet if I wanted to survive! Think about what I can do!
The side that is introducing things incrementally didn’t do it because they wanted to; it just ended up that way as a result.
What is easy to say is often difficult to do.
It’s foolish strategy; at the point where you can’t gather information after one or two incursions, you’ve already lost.
If you don’t understand, it’s good to ask the meaning instead of letting it go!
Going all in on firepower was called something like a migratory fish in some game…
If the battlefield is narrow, we can’t all charge at once.
Moving large military forces incurs considerable costs as well.
I’m not a soldier, I’m an adventurer, so I won’t really do it… gradually introduced.
Tze will break… huh…?
On the contrary, the person who concentrated their forces in one place and won repeatedly was the “Kokushi Musou.”
Isn’t there a way to send it in smaller portions due to the efficiency issues of firepower projection?
That’s exactly logistics! Logistics! It becomes a world of large-scale marches.
If we are to move a large force all at once, we need to quickly transport the scattered troops and supplies within the country abroad, so we must also improve the domestic railway network and roadways.
Therefore, a general who can appropriately secure a sufficient reserve, and deploy the right amount at the right time and the right place, is called a great general.
Because youth and education were all taken away by goblins, I have no culture…
Sequential deployment is a foolish strategy, but recklessly using up all reserve forces is also a foolish strategy.
I wonder what I should do…
I understand that merely exhausting resources through sequential deployment is a foolish strategy, but it is the result of misunderstanding the reconnaissance capabilities and the interplay with other battlefields.
It seems that it’s not the goal to fail in a sequential input manner, but rather that it tends to happen as a result when things don’t go well.
If it’s a military at the image level, all you need is food for people and horses, right?
Unless it’s about besieging a castle, local procurement is fine.
The new sister is confirmed to be alive because the Goblin Slayer song is spreading.
Even if you do the same thing, if you win, it becomes an appropriate allocation of resources, but if you lose, it turns into a delayed sequential deployment.
I mean, Goblins have always been extremely dangerous since the time Kobusure was a newcomer.
>>56But the world won’t end tomorrow, right?
>>56It is also something that can be managed to some extent if a newcomer receives support from a veteran.
Sequential deployment is treated like a symbol of foolish strategy.
There are quite a few equally bad patterns, yet I rarely come across negative images or discussions about “defending to the death.”
I should be pretty much wiped out or devastated.
>>57Isn’t it treating Germany and Japan in WW2 as the pinnacle of foolishness?
>>57Depending on the situation, it’s different from wasting resources on that…
>>57Meaningless defense will be criticized endlessly.
There are simply many situations that leave us no choice but to act that way, and there’s nothing we can do about it.
>>64I say, but…
Indeed, it’s just that incremental contribution.
In the end, it’s just a temporary fix because you don’t grasp the situation.
>>60…the election is today.
If you have a solid plan for what the remaining ones will do after releasing things little by little, then that might be acceptable.
Since there are limits to the budget, I would be happy if we could make it just in time…
In World War II, the order to defend in winter 1941 was considered a success for both Germany and the Soviet Union, and the Allied forces also succeeded in Bastogne, right?
Despite being an uneducated adventurer, you eagerly absorb knowledge.
>>67I have no education or talent, so I’ve been taught to at least use my head.
When you delve into this kind of story, you end up fighting.
>>71If you can achieve your goals without fighting, that’s better…
>>80Alright, I’ll send opium to my opponent!
The terrifying demons in this world are at a level that can annihilate entire armies.
Only weak enemies can be dealt with by adventurous outsiders.
It seems that the difficulty is such that if you roll the dice and don’t get a 1, it’s like successfully defeating a goblin…
dice1d6=1 (1)
>>73I fumbled…
>>73Damn it…
My adventure has come to an end…
>>73What, is it just the world of Goblin Slayer’s main story?
Are you a master of consideration?
It’s easy to casually say things like retreat.
It’s often thought that withdrawing is an easy action.
Fleeing in disorder is completely different from a retreat, and a retreat cannot be done without considerable preparation and thorough research.
In primitive battles like those with swords and spears, the casualty rate doesn’t change much with the size of the numbers, but I’ve heard that in modern warfare, the more troops you have, the lower the casualty rate.
If you can win easily, then fight.
Let’s refine our judgment skills there.
Reliable big sisters keep showing up one after another.
Reliable older sisters are disappearing one after another.
>>82Only one person has died so far!
One more person literally left the stage.
…is it peace?
>>84The supply route to units in battle is fundamental, isn’t it?
>>94I see, so that’s what it means…
When I explain my job by the seaside to my childhood friend and say “there were fish,” it troubles me because it makes me envision small children.
There are now many fools who are making a fuss, claiming that introducing gradual repositioning according to the situation is a foolish strategy!
>>86Dividing the troops is also a dispersal of strength! It’s a foolish strategy! There are people who say this as well.
Go to 14.
If Goblin Slayer can kill goblins without fighting, then he’ll choose that option.
Having a group incurs costs just by existing, and there are also costs associated with managing it.
Misjudging the situation in the battle and gradually deploying forces can lead to exhaustion in every possible aspect.
As a result of going all in, there are many cases where surpluses disappear or impossibilities arise, ultimately leading to failure.
However, in the case of sequential input, it tends to lead to an overall losing streak, so I think there is a particular tendency to mention that.
If you weren’t planning for waves 2 and 3 from the start, it’s just a series of consecutive losses.
In the main story, even though the Road is treated as a strong enemy, it’s stated in the narration that if he wins at the ranch and then attacks the town afterwards, he will simply die as a weakling.
Even lower-ranking demons that aren’t top-tier can cause the disappearance of thousands of humans.
>>96The defense of the ranch is an extraordinarily organized and sophisticated raid for goblins, but conversely, it also means that it’s not on a level that would mobilize the national army.
Maintaining advanced flexibility while responding to changes in the environment…?
>>97Let’s stop with vague plans that have no concrete proposals at all.
>>103General officers, shut up!!!!
Goblin Slayer’s attitude towards learning is straightforward…
The sorceress sister has also disappeared…
>>100I have become a planeswalker.
This is a post-fact analysis about a situation where the estimated military strength was insufficient to proceed.
>>101Well, I don’t know about goblins.
Even ordinary enemies are usually careful not to reveal their total battle strength to their opponents.
A forerunner, huh…
A forced march, huh…
>>105I think we should stop pushing our way through…
Do not mix with the Titans.
Not set up on the highway, but on the mountaintop…
Goblin Slayer doesn’t show emotions, speaks concisely and minimally, which can easily lead to misunderstandings, but deep down he’s good-hearted and has a keen desire to learn.
Somehow… a newcomer with motivation has finally had the chance come around.
Yeah, the seniors are all eager to teach.
I see…
The danger level of goblins is often used as foot soldiers, so it’s quite common for there to be something really dangerous lurking behind them.
To avoid sequential deployment, if we try to gather and send troops from a certain distance behind, it’s likely that we would suffer significant damage from territorial encroachment by then.
This older sister immediately realizes that Goblin Slayer is a child with no education and treats him really kindly.
Just to make sure it doesn’t get revealed with my attitude.
Kouseigenkaiten…?
Anything is fine, but the “meat shield” in the image isn’t a strategy using our fellow goblins as shields by overwhelming them with numbers or anything like that.
Is that where you’re going…?
>>123I understand that it’s unpleasant, but I will do it.
It’s a group of brats with no sense of ethics.
What is the social gathering?
Gaisyuu isshoku?
Are you a bug in the lion’s heart?
Is Zion’s spirit taking shape?