Did you lick Excalibur, but it didn’t petrify? Are you okay?

I wonder if I’ll turn to stone…

If my tongue isn’t cut, I should probably be okay…?

What exactly is Excalibur…?

Since I returned it to the lake in the end, it shouldn’t be found with Arthur…

The Sword of Selection and Excalibur are fundamentally different things, aren’t they?

You didn’t know?

Wasn’t it the sheath that doesn’t spill blood, not the owner…?

No way… Excalibur!

The effect of the sword? It shines a lot!

If a sword was stuck in a stone, does that mean what the sword is stuck in is the stone?

Ho ho… Since I unearthed the tomb of King Arthur, it’s only natural that I obtained the Holy Grail and also became immortal in body.

Could it be that the stone that was stuck is just a dead body?

So, does that mean the rock was created because Excalibur was stabbed into it…?

It’s interesting to interpret that it wasn’t stuck in the stone, but rather it became stone because it was pierced.
I wonder if there was a legend about the opponent turning into a statue after being cut!?

I need to check with Merlin…

Excalibur!!!!

I thought it was God Cider, but it was different.
Looking back now, I think they shouldn’t have serialized such a brutal character in a shonen magazine.

Works that seem to have phrases like “super battle!” attached as a selling point for a fantasy genre!
There’s a part of me that wonders how much I can add my own elements and interpretations to the actual anecdotes.

So it’s Excalibur 2?

Mr. Ogino of “Peacock King” gathered a lot of materials and anecdotes, and then presented an amazing way to connect and interpret them for the manga.

Wasn’t Excalibur the sword pulled from the stone that was strengthened by the lake spirit, turning it into Excalibur?

It seems that Mikusutori is not the name of a god, but rather the name of a calendar.

The stone sword and Excalibur are different swords.
It’s strangely major even though it’s a discussion based on the depiction mistakes in the Thomas Malory version.

Excalibur, which can be casually lost depending on the story.
I sometimes find Excalibur lying in the grass by the roadside.

In this world, you returned Excalibur, right?

There are many traces of changes added later in the history of the Arthurian legend itself.
It’s hard to say that the thread image is exceptionally silly…

What!? Isn’t Excalibur’s ability “to release some mysterious beam when swung”?!

But if the sword shines brilliantly, can’t you gain the upper hand by doing it during the clash of swords?

I don’t know what form the spirit of chivalry took in those days, but it seems like a coward’s weapon… When I write that…

Pero

The reason why the story “The stone sword is not Excalibur” became widely known is
In the original story of the stone sword, the name is not mentioned (however, it was interpreted as Excalibur at that time).
In “The Death of Arthur,” there is a depiction error where two Excaliburs appear.
In the explanation of “The Death of King Arthur,” it is noted that one (the sword in the stone) is believed not to be Excalibur.
Using this as inspiration, the story of King Arthur is written in modern times.
…feels like that.

Excalibur is a weapon that you swing around the pedestal, right?
I know, I know.

“Emission = Beam means”
I wonder if Kaguya-hime can also shoot beams from her face.