Isn’t it because it seems like tens of thousands of lives could be lost during that learning process…?

It’s amazing that you’re starting something like this.

I feel that instead of becoming a world of violence, there is a decrease in power harassment.

Do you like this yellow image?

>>10

It looks like a page that has jaundice…

It’s too loose, and it seems like it could easily be exploited by loopholes or pressured through money and power, making it unlikely to be established.

>>12

The key point is that not being held accountable for that crime is crucial, yet you can’t grasp that—you’re truly the real deal in terms of intellectual disability.

>>12

On the contrary, when considered comprehensively, guns are quite difficult to use.

>>12

The point is that not being prosecuted is crucial, yet you can’t grasp that; you really are a genuine intellectual weakling.

>>12

The key point is that you are not being held accountable for that sin, but you can’t even grasp that; you’re truly lacking in intelligence.

If it comes down to it, I can just go with the “please pretend this development never happened” approach like One Punch Man.

>>13

I don’t think amateurs can hit it even if they shoot.

If I get close enough to guarantee a hit, it seems like I’ll have my handgun taken away.

I think that whether or not they are prosecuted, those who have used even one shot will be excluded or divided and that will be the end of it.

I can commit suicide anytime.

The reasoning that it’s okay to kill someone because you won’t be punished for it can only be accepted by someone with Asperger’s.

Normal people avoid killing even if there are no laws or penalties.

People buying bulletproof vests will likely increase.

In reality, it seems that there are even less than 10% of people who actually shoot guns.

Well, unless you keep firing, the one you shot will probably be done with just one shot.

What needs to happen to prove something?

What will happen to the handling of crimes associated with murder?

Three times is too few, isn’t it?

It might be an accidental discharge up to three shots.

There seems to be an increase in the theft and buying/selling of the provided bullets.

If you aren’t held accountable for your crimes, you’ll be killed if you kill someone, right?

It won’t be established without a system that definitely connects the bullet to the person.

If it’s fine to use it however you want, then as long as I have three bullets left, threatening with a gun and taking money and valuables is safe, right?

If you wear armor, you won’t die, so it’s an advantage for the rich.

It seems that having everyone in the country hold a switch might be more properly tested.

Just because you have a weapon and won’t be punished for using it, do you kill? Or do you not kill?

It’s a story about trying to gauge the goodness of people.

What does it mean when someone says things like “It’s meaningless because doing this won’t kill anyone anytime soon”?

>>35

Well, this is a story about Japan with 10,000 assassins…

>>35

Time moves into the future on its own, but that doesn’t mean the social system is always moving forward…

>>35

No, this is a story about Japan with 10,000 assassins…

>>110

It’s not something that should happen in a manga where the protagonist is a gag character who kills people in their mind or talks about the state of human hearts.

>>110

The way the protagonist’s manga portrays killing people in their mind and the nuances of human emotion is just not fitting for a joke.

>>110

So it’s too trivial to have the protagonist of a manga kill people with a gag about what’s going on in people’s hearts and brains.

>>35

Time moves into the future on its own, but the social system doesn’t always move forward…

Cars that can’t be prosecuted for running someone over seem to be popular.

As long as there are people who are forced to kill under threats, nothing can be measured, right?

>>164

Threats are crimes, so you will be prosecuted.

>>38

In that case, a guideline is needed for the range of “how to use the bullet.”

>>146

I feel like it will just depend on the person…

I wonder if you would be charged with robbery if you used it for a robbery and murder.

>>42

You won’t be prosecuted for how you use bullets, but you can be charged with a violation of the Firearm and Sword Control Law for possessing a real gun…

I wonder if I have to retaliate using this gun because it doesn’t meet the requirements for justifiable self-defense.

It looks like these three shots will trend in dark side jobs.

It’s not something to be done in a manga where the protagonist turns killing people in their mind into a joke about human emotions.

I haven’t read it in a long time, but this world was illegal for murder.

The ordered glasses may just be using the thread image as ambition.

I wonder what Shishiba-san is thinking.

It’s understandable that Slara-kun lacks common sense because he hasn’t received a proper education.

>>49

It seems that giving a Switch to everyone in the country would be a better way to properly test it.

I’m curious about the feelings of fans who were reading seriously.

It’s quite interesting as a hook for a manga, but…

In today’s Japan, SNS has become so widespread that it only leads to comedic banter.

Stealing someone else’s bullets is not a crime, and it’s a pardon even if they are not distributed in the first place.

If this situation involves the government, it would probably lead to the emergence of new security organizations.

As long as there is a killing connection that makes this possible, it will also be restricted, and I just don’t understand the meaning of a society based on the kindness of a slur.

Since Kami-gawari has something to do with Yotsumura-san, they probably had some dissatisfaction with their current situation as an assassin.

Can’t understand the rules?

Even if he isn’t held criminally liable, if it comes out that he killed someone, he’ll be socially dead.

Is there any legitimacy to a bill passed under the threat of violence?

>>57

I laughed remembering that scene.

>>60

It might be a misfire up to three shots.

Did someone just talk about Kill Me?

For now, I think I will be ridiculously mocked on social media.

A feeling that Akira-chan can’t be kawaii anymore.

I thought it was interesting as a thought experiment.

In reality, modern society is exactly the same.

In Japan, you could buy a knife right now and kill someone if you wanted to.

This guy moves based on the mood, and when his allies get killed by the enemy, he gets angry saying, “Why do you take from me…!” so his impression is too bad.

I haven’t had it even once, but does that mean I’ll have it three times in my future…?

>>69

I think perhaps a different personality is doing the killing.

If someone can fire one shot, they can probably fire three shots, so isn’t one shot enough?

>>70

>>70

It’s just an uninteresting character going crazy and causing trouble! It’s annoying.

The characterization of Slur is a huge failure, but the author is being stubborn, so the story keeps getting worse.

That… guns are a unique evil that possesses the ability to infinitely escalate incidents done out of impulse, and the fact that they are not in the hands of civilians maintains public safety in Japan.

Every time a shooting incident occurs in America, an anonymous person has said it’s treated on the same level as knives and cars…

It’s not a bill; it’s just that the slur makes the country listen to its power.

So if the slur falls apart, the one who committed murder will be left hanging.

If the majority of humanity consisted of those with Asperger’s who could accept the reasoning that it’s okay to kill someone as long as they are not punished for it.

I think humanity would be living the same way as primitive people, without building society or developing civilization.

Ah, if you wear armor you won’t die, so it’s advantageous for the rich.

Since there are the Four Villages in Kamigami Kaikai, they probably felt dissatisfaction with the current situation of the assassins.

I wonder if a novice won’t hit the target even if they shoot.

If I get close enough to definitely hit, it seems like they’ll take my gun.

If you don’t set a deadline, the situation will continue with unexploded ordnance for decades…

I think a lot of the TV’s power has been turned off because of having a head cut into a ring.

Huh, 300 million shots?

A character that isn’t interesting at all is acting crazy and causing a lot of trouble! It’s frustrating.

As long as there are people who are forced to kill under threat, nothing can be measured, right?

>>146

Well, I feel like it just depends on the person…

Shut up because you smell like poop.

I haven’t read it in a long time, but in this world, murder is illegal.

What you’re trying to do is a sort of test behavior that resembles being emotionally unstable.

It’s annoying that one of the intentions behind the original image is that humanity isn’t that stupid.

I want the annoying behavior to just die on its own.

Originally, if four people were killed, it would be treated as natural law that divine judgment would befall, leading to the creation of a subordinate legislative organization.

In this world, there are probably people who can melt guns and kill endlessly.

If it’s okay to use it however you want, then while there are still 3 shots left, threatening with a gun to take valuables is safe, right?

Unlike some Sukuna, there’s a genuine lack of charm.

Well, as long as you don’t fire in rapid succession, those that get hit by a single shot will probably be finished.

Kamigami Mai probably had some dissatisfaction with the current situation as an assassin due to the matter involving Yotsumura-san.

I thought this story was way too triggering.

>>99

Huh, 300 million shots?

It’s not a bill; it’s just that Slara makes the country listen to him with his abilities.

So if the slur collapses, the person who committed the murder will be left hanging.

>>102

Did someone just talk about Kill Me?

>>102

Did someone just talk about killing me?

I haven’t read that long thing, but in this world, murder is illegal.

I don’t think a beginner would be able to hit it even if they shoot.

It seems like I might get my handgun taken away if I get too close to a distance where I can definitely hit.

This guy moves like this and my allies get killed by the enemy → Why do you guys steal from me…! He’s the type to get really angry, so the impression is just too bad.

Well, normally if you kill four people, it would be treated as natural law, resulting in a lower legislative organization due to divine judgment.

In this world, there are probably those who can melt guns and kill infinitely.

>>109

Why? I can commit suicide anytime.

Since Mr. Sura has not received a proper education, it can’t be helped that he lacks common sense.

Seriously, even if they’re not prosecuted, if it turns out that person killed someone, they’ll die socially.

>>115

Well, unless you can shoot continuously, the one you shot with a single shot will probably be finished.

>>115

I think that even if they are not held accountable for their crimes, those who have used it once will be excluded or divided and end up that way.

>>120

If you don’t face punishment, it’s just that if you kill, you’ll be killed, right?

>>120

What do you mean by not being charged with a crime? If you kill someone, you’ll get killed in return, right?

>>120

It’s not just that you won’t be punished; if you kill, you’ll be killed in return, right?

That helps…

I wonder if a beginner wouldn’t hit the target even if they tried.

It seems that I might be in danger of having my handgun taken away if I get too close to the assured distance.

Ah, if you put on armor you won’t die, so it’s an advantage for the rich, isn’t it?

👄👅👂👃👣👁

>>137

Even if you say it’s under the condition of being innocent…

It’s not that people don’t commit murder because of sin or punishment, but rather that humanity added sin and punishment afterwards because it would be problematic if murder were allowed.

I think that if even one person is excluded or divided, it will end up in being questioned for a crime.

I guess I have to fight back using this gun since it doesn’t quite meet the requirements for justifiable defense.

>>124

It’s always like that with anonymous users, isn’t it?

I haven’t read that long thing, but in this world, murder is illegal.

Since debuting at the age of 18 in 1985, she has released numerous hit songs and continues to lead the Japanese R&B scene, including works produced by Prince and Maurice White.

In recent years, they have been actively broadcasting on YouTube, widely delivering their unchanged singing voice.

From the new album scheduled for release this year, the cover song “Neet Afternoon 3 PM” will be included as a bonus track on February 7, by Kohhy.

>>126

Ah, if you wear armor, you won’t die, so the rich have an advantage.

This manga is set in a silly world where assassins are responsible for maintaining public order…

>>130

If we don’t set a deadline, the situation with unexploded ordnance will continue for decades…

Ah, if you wear armor, you won’t die, so it’s advantageous for the rich, isn’t it?

It’s quite interesting as a hook for a manga, but…

In today’s Japan, social media has become too widespread, turning everything into just a comedy show.

Stealing someone else’s bullets is not a crime, and even if they are not distributed, it is still absolved.

This guy acts on impulse and his allies get killed by the enemy → He gets angry saying, “Why do you take things from me…!” so his impression is really bad.

>>140

This guy moves like this and my comrades get killed by the enemy → Why do you guys take from me…! I get so angry, it leaves a really bad impression.

It’s quite interesting as a hook for a manga, though.

In today’s Japan, social media is so prevalent that it only leads to a comedy show.

Stealing someone else’s bullets is not guilty, and it’s absolved even if they aren’t distributed in the first place.

>>185

Wait, it seems like the shadow work of using these three shots is going to become popular.

Thank you…

If it comes down to it, I can just say to negate this development like One Punch Man.

Just because you have a weapon and won’t be prosecuted for using it, will you kill? Or will you not kill?

It’s a story about trying to understand human goodness, though.

What does it mean when someone says something like “It’s meaningless because doing something like this won’t kill anyone anyway”?

Summer vacation is over, and the second semester is finally here. This semester is also a fruitful one, and the children are greatly…

It will continue to grow.

Entrance briefing – Every Thursday from 11 AM (September to October) at Niko Niko, we are holding discussions about entrance information and parenting consultations for those who are interested. Please speak to the person in charge.

The Niko Niko Mini Sports Day will be held on Thursday, October 8th!

Let’s enjoy a race, dance, and games with parents and children, and get some souvenirs!

It feels like a curse in a bad way.

It’s fairly interesting as a hook for a manga, but…

In present-day Japan, social media is so widespread that it only turns into a comedy showdown.

Stealing someone else’s bullets is innocent, and it is also absolved even if not distributed in the first place.

Huh? 300 million shots?

Three times is too few, right?

>>158

It’s so full of loopholes that it seems like it could be easily exploited or pushed through with money and power, making it hard to establish.

>>162

Since we have gone through a primitive era without violence to arrive at the current societal norms and rule of law, isn’t that already an answer…?

>>162

Different.

If you don’t set a deadline, the situation will continue for decades with unexploded ordnance.

After all, even if I say it’s under the condition that there is no crime…

It’s not that people don’t commit murder because of sin and punishment; rather, humanity added sin and punishment because allowing murder would be problematic.

… it’s relatively interesting as a comic.

Now in Japan, SNS has become so widespread that we can only look at it in amusement.

Stealing someone else’s bullets is not guilty, or perhaps it’s absolution even if you don’t distribute them.

As long as there are people who are forced to kill under threat, nothing can be measured.

It’s quite interesting as a manga.

In today’s Japan, SNS has become so widespread that there’s nothing to do but rely on it for laughter.

“Stealing other people’s bullets and still being innocent, or even being pardoned without being distributed.”

Is it okay to boldly shoot and kill a president when going abroad?

>>171

Originally, if someone kills four people, it would be considered natural law that divine judgment would come down, leading to the formation of a lower legislative organization.

In this world, there are probably things that melt guns and kill infinitely.

It’s kind not to be questioned for your sins.

It’s not bad to be fully in the second year of middle school, but whether it can be interesting is up to the author.

>>174

It feels like a curse in a bad way.

As long as there are people who can be forced to kill others, nothing can be measured in this world.

I think that if even one person is used for this, they will end up being excluded or divided and it won’t be questioned as a crime.

It’s a manga that includes a lot of scenes with the general public calmly reacting to the violence of the surrounding assassins, in a humorous way.

I don’t know how to react if they seriously bring up questions about violence or the existence of death to the public.

Well, it’s pretty interesting as a hook for a manga.

In today’s Japan, social media is so widespread that it only turns into a comedy show.

Stealing other people’s bullets is not guilty, and it’s also absolved even if they aren’t distributed in the first place.

And then it seems that the theft and trading of the provided ammunition will run rampant.