I thought, is Seven sane for doing a manga collaboration that hasn’t even been adapted into an anime?

Even if we say it’s a collaboration, it’s just putting on stickers.

1111 kilocalories, huh?

>>3

It’s a typical stinginess of Seven, isn’t it?

With this collaboration, it’s at least 2000.

>>92

You should be able to tell how many rice balls I’ve eaten before this bento just by reading this.

At first glance, I thought it wasn’t that great considering it’s a collaboration with Mochidzuki-san.

>>3

Whoa…

>>3

You weakling.

It’s not quite there with the collaboration meal! Just barely!

Do you realize that the collaboration is not giving a very good impression?

It can be said that it is a collaboration that is more copyright-friendly than anime.

I want the calories to be more absurd.

This was normally huge.

Eating this makes you feel like that… is the impression you get.

Please tell me your thoughts on the taste.

>>15

Chicken cutlet is delicious, and the pilaf tastes the same as the one sold separately.

It feels like I’ve packed in a lot of what is often placed underneath a bento, and eating this amount is tough…

>>15

The usual amount of food was a bit too much for someone like Energy Drink Senpai.

It would have been fine to have just one of either the rice pilaf or spaghetti, as both have too many carbohydrates.

It was a special edition like a PR for Seven’s products.

…Is this really becoming PR?

Is a blood sugar spike really that pleasant?

>>17

Let’s give it a try.

Is the bento in the thread image without a lid?

>>18

The upper surface is probably there to make it easier to warm up.

It’s a prelude to a drama that has already been confirmed for airing.

The fats and sugars are intense…

I thought Mochizuki-san would eat about five times this amount.

>>23

Are you a sumo wrestler?

>>37

Yes

>>43

I think it’s almost certain that there aren’t any anonymous individuals at Dentsu…

It’s not like the usual Seven; it actually has a proper amount. It does come at a corresponding price, though.

I feel it’s strange that I have to say it’s different from the usual Seven.

It is a characteristic of Mochizuki threads to be filled with responses that clearly have a different tone.

It’s funny how they’re completely focused on product descriptions.

Sometimes there are people who feel like they have become Mochizuki-san, even if they are anonymous.

>>30

I want to become (it).

I can’t spend 700 yen on convenience store bento because I’m broke.

Is Dentsu getting stuck to Seven?

If Mochizuki doesn’t get adapted into a drama, I’ll apologize… but it’s already a given, right?

>>35

The weekend mishaps of the other person wouldn’t be that interesting even if they were made into a drama.

Is this 700 yen…?

I ate the picture from the thread yesterday, but the quantity wasn’t as overwhelming as I thought.

It feels like an ordinary large bento.

I want to try the mayo fried chicken eventually.

>>41

Are you okay?

Aren’t you getting a headache?

Looks like it’s got good calories, maybe I’ll go buy some later.

I dislike how people who recognize Seven as something good are criticizing it without even knowing the facts.

It’s cheap for the quantity, but how does it taste?

>>46

It was the usual Seven.

It’s not bad, but… that’s how it is.

It’s probably content that Dentsu is heavily invested in.

The way he/she puts in effort is extraordinary.

？？？？？

>>49

55555kcal

>>61

I reached it five times!

Since it’s the amount and calories for two regular meals, it’s cheap if you split it into two servings.

Dentsu is trying to elevate the Japanese people…?

Dentsu and Hakuhodo are the worst.

I don’t know how to say it, but it feels like Seven used to have good quality, but recently it’s been lacking.

It looks like FamilyMart and Lawson have better quality.

It was just the right amount.

…Is this a collaboration?

The other displayed items are small, so it feels big.

I think 1111 calories is everything.

>>59

It’s not as great as I thought!

>>60

In reality, the collaboration manga has consumed all the collaboration products at once.

The individual item feels a bit lacking in power.

It’s bad to have.

Seven was late to the oversized portions trend and it had been reported that their sales had dropped significantly, so this might have been a good excuse for them.

Do we need to butter the pilaf…?

I won’t trust what Seven says until I see it with my own eyes.

Peyoung Super Large Serving is 237g with 1081kcal.

The fat content is better in Peyoung.

Carbohydrates are better in the thread image.

In terms of price, it’s just the equivalent of three large servings…

I’m a little curious about the rice ball.

Get everything and recreate 3444 kcal.

Well, to be serious, there are probably some anonymous users who think of this as a small bulletin board.

It’s the largest in the otaku community, so publishers are quite active there.

Chicken cutlet with carbohydrates in formation.

It feels like the usual Seven with a huge serving boasting 1111 calories.

I mean, is Lawson just putting stickers on during a time when they’re keeping prices the same and doing a 47% increase? Is that a joke?

Mochizuki-san doesn’t really pay attention to cost performance, so I think she just buys two if one isn’t enough.

That’s a rational calorie…

That’s not a collaboration that food should be involved in…

Probably bought by some construction workers who likely haven’t read it.

I need to double the calories.

>>77

The current fair menu at Yoshinoya claims to be from the year 2000.

>>81

I have no choice but to go, you fatso.

I thought it was crazy that there was a collaboration café in Ogawamachi.

I tried buying it and eating it, but it turned out to be heavy in terms of weight, meal quantity, and oil!

If this appeals to the masses, then it is a pathology.

It’s a bit funny to be called Mochizuki.

If you’re spending 700 yen on carbohydrates and don’t feel the value, then to put it mildly, it’s garbage.

>>83

It is indeed heavyweight.

It feels hastily put together without a sense of collaboration, and even when I actually eat it, I can’t help but think it just tastes like the usual 7-Eleven flavor.

Roka curry is far more satisfying as a collaborative dish.

>>83

It’s not that collaborative manga is cheap compared to the price; it’s just off the mark.

I ate rice balls for both breakfast and lunch.

It was heavy when I held it.

I think Mochizuki-san would like it because it has a somewhat salty taste.

The one with meat in it has a richer flavor and is recommended.

What does Mochidzuki-san’s collaboration flavor taste like?

>>87

The pork curry onigiri was quite chewy.

I found out there was demi-hamburgers, but those weren’t lined up.

It might have been okay to show the part where someone dies in the first episode of this manga.

I don’t understand the feeling of it being Mochizuki.

Does that mean you like flavors meant for fat people?

>>90

The recipes and taste trends are similar to what I cook at home.

>>90

To put it bluntly, that’s how it is.

Furthermore, it can be said that the unhealthy and violent quantity and seasoning that completely ignore human health cannot be removed.

Mochizuki-san eats all the collaboration products from Seven in one meal.

A quite tough amount for ordinary people.

>>96

Nasonin

I can’t deny that it felt like a 700 yen assorted selection of Seven’s bento.

Since I couldn’t buy onigiri, if it has a good reputation, I might take a look at night.

Seven Adhesive has set its sights on a collaboration with a manga.

This time, they started making baseless accusations and sticking to the Dentsu case and other things…

I feel like this collaboration is concerned about comments saying that the quantity has decreased or that there are false bottoms.

>>99

But this is also a hidden lift, right?

>>105

How are you going to elevate the rice balls that make up the majority of the collaboration menu?

>>108

I often hear that there’s a hollow space inside onigiri, or that the filling in sandwiches is only visible in certain parts.

>>105

Can’t you see the calorie label?

This bento isn’t fake-bottomed, and even if it were, it’s still in the category of overeating.

>>118

I think this amount at FamilyMart would be around 2,000 kcal.

>>122

Why are the calories different when the quantity is the same?

I’ll say it in advance, but the container wasn’t a fake bottom.

>>99

It’s said that there is little for the price.

If it’s for binge eating, I’ll spend quite a bit, but collaborating with Mochizuki-san is a bit different.

>>106

It is worth the price.

>>110

I think it’s more expensive compared to other companies’ large serving menus.

To be honest, I’ve never thought that Mochizuki-san looks delicious while reading, so I’m not at all tempted by the collaboration dishes.

>>100

That’s why it’s important, because it’s a proper sense.

The impression of the manga isn’t that it looks delicious or that I want to eat it.

Words like death and dangerous are floating around.

More than 1,000 calories per meal.

I feel like I’ll be scolded if I enter it into Asuken.

>>107

👹

You’re not Mochizuki-san…

I’m hoping for Mochizuki-san’s quantity, but that doesn’t mean I’m giving up on my commitment to taste, okay?

The other bento, which was nearly 1300 kcal, felt quite junky and was good.

Seven Eleven has better taste than other convenience stores, so it’s probably going to be a bit more expensive.

Well, it’s Seven after all…

People who are saying “it’s a raised bottom” based on spinal reflexes should go to the convenience store, buy all the collaboration products, and confirm it before speaking.

Regardless of the actual situation, I thought there would definitely be haters springing up, and sure enough, there were.

It’s a plan from the stage when it first went viral.

Incredible sense of speed.

I don’t want to eat 2000 kcal of Famima’s terrible bento.

The collaboration rice ball is a product in this sandwich-style format, isn’t it?

“What are you looking at, saying ‘there’s a hollow inside’…”