data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de98f/de98fb2f11293ce30a54d85d5dc47817c27186a9" alt=""
Mii-chan, reflect! You really hate being scolded by adults, right? That’s why you think you can finally do your homework when you get yelled at, right? I really hate it, I really hate it, I really hate it!! Mii-chan dislikes being scolded… Haa… Haaa…
That’s right.
The consequences of underestimating disabled people.
I really hate it!
I really hate it!
I really don’t like it!
I hate that Mii-chan doesn’t read the original work and only uses the formulaic stuff…!
>>3
I hope you’ll forgive me for this manga.
>>8
No, read it.
It’s not just a provocation that Muu-chan might have some kind of disability.
>>4
That’s why the contrast is beautiful even among the same disabilities…
>>4
Let’s go to the welfare center together! The part about “together” is the most important, right?
The bullying experience from elementary school is part of the underlying cause.
Even after being shown such a tantrum, Kokoro-chan took care of things for a few more days.
The original work isn’t worth reading, right?
>>9
It seems that they find value in talking about it as a topic, even though they’re saying this.
>>14
>>14
This is a seriously weird source of inspiration!
The scream was just a tantrum scene…
I think Koko-chan never imagined encountering someone who can’t study at a first-grade level.
The original work has prominent lurid parts, so you don’t have to read it if you don’t want to!
If you’re looking forward to seeing Mii-chan being brutally killed, then that’s just how it is.
It’s crazy that even with free access, some people still hesitate.
>>15
Loss of time and spirit
It’s not about money… It’s simply unpleasant, this manga.
>>16
It can’t be denied that I’m enjoying collaging an unpleasant original source…
I hate reading the original work of Anonymous-chan…
Mii-chan’s situation was bad, but her desperate attitude that as long as she licks it, the man will somehow be okay stands out.
It feels like the usual developments that ordinary people would expect in a manga depicting such characters are already covered by Muu-chan.
It’s easier to read because it’s cuter than the unnamed one.
It just looks like they’re piling up reasons why someone deserves to be killed because they’re worthless.
>>21
If Mii-chan were a girl loved in a proper sense, death would not be the conclusion of the story, but rather the beginning of another drama.
Where does the image of overweight people being gentle and kind come from? Cheerful and kind, the popular ones everyone loves—none of the overweight people I know are like that. They are short-tempered and easily irritated, and I’ve had more unpleasant experiences with overweight people. They can’t hold back, lack planning, and are selfish.
If I were to explain it in one page to someone who hasn’t seen the original, it’s generally like this comic.
I don’t really think disabled people would come over.
I think it’s become a specialty here that those who don’t know the original source tend to speak with surprising confidence.
>>27
When confronted, they retort, “I haven’t read it, so I don’t know that!”
>>56
It feels like Mii-chan’s mother has a bit of a reverse rage vibe.
>>59
It also has a bit of a Mii-chan vibe.
>>62
“Little Mii”
It seems you haven’t read the original work!
It’s a waste of time to throw things in the bulletin board.
How many anonymous readers are actually reading the great citizens?
This author’s works are essentially just exaggerated and provocative content aimed at gaining buzz and attention.
It’s not really something you should take too seriously when you read it.
>>31
It’s impressive that you were able to swallow the word “Diana.”
>>31
In that way, without knowing the content, just relying on information picked up from the internet.
Thinking you’re stating a valid argument means your mind is troubled.
Let’s go to the welfare center together.
>>31
What are you talking about in a fictional manga? Are you out of your mind?
It’s beautiful that I’m reaching the same level as Mii-chan’s mom, who ironically says that you don’t need to read the original work or even read books.
I don’t understand the mysterious theory that says you shouldn’t make jokes about something if you haven’t read the original work.
>>33
There aren’t any responses like that anywhere, huh? lol
>>33
No one has said anything like that.
Why are we talking about a manga that goes so far as to say it’s a loss of time and spirit?
Are you crazy?
It’s just something people think.
>>39
Watching Devilman is a waste of time and mental energy, but it’s fun to make jokes about it, right?
The act of showing off that you haven’t read (it) and won’t read (it) is just being annoying, but whether you read it or not is your choice.
Kokoro-chan is at a level where you can say she’s a kind person.
Mii-chan’s behavior was too abnormal, which was the problem.
I’m reading it to make jokes, but to be honest, it’s a more decent manga for those who haven’t read it.
It’s like Tekkonkinkreet.
A scene where a tantrum occurred because the trauma switch was flipped.
>>43
It’s not trauma; it’s just that a disabled child left neglected by toxic parents grows up like this.
I seriously hate the author!
>>44
Anyone who can only speak in clichés should just die!!
>>52
Shall we die together?
>>52
It seems like they don’t realize that they are part of a group of people who would be better off dead.
It’s one thing to just play around with the format, but it’s ridiculous to talk about the content when you haven’t read it.
It’s strange to come up with reasons for not reading.
I can tell there’s a loss even though I haven’t read it.
I think it’s insincere, but I don’t want to read it.
I will talk as if everyone knows, so just grasp the overview.
It’s a different person who spoke up, but I’m really reading it.
Moreover, it’s painful, and I want Mimi to die quickly.
>>49
In short, isn’t that just a wish for this manga to end quickly?
>>73
If Mu-chan is the protagonist, I want to read more…
>>78
I can assure you that I absolutely won’t read it.
>>82
It seems like there might be some issues.
Despite saying that reading others’ work is a waste of time,
What you’re doing is considered a waste of time, and it’s ugly how you scream when you hear that.
Please kill me gently.
I bought just one volume, but after reading half of it, I thought that might be enough…
Since I can’t read manga with kanji, Anonymous-chan…
>>61
It seems that they probably can’t read manga in the first place.
You can use standard phrases however you like.
What are you getting so worked up about?
If I spoil it, Poison Uncle, Gachi Zoku, and Cell won’t appear, and the other person is Mu-chan, not the main character Mii-chan.
Let’s read together!
https://pocket.shonenmagazine.com/episode/2550912964519016240
Anyway, getting involved with works you find unpleasant is a waste of time.
It’s understandable if it’s a person with a disability.
Even though a helping hand has been extended many times, I have brushed it aside, and the reason I have come to reject help lies in my upbringing, including my parents, making it inherently difficult to be saved in the true sense.
Isn’t there anything that can be done?
>>69
Let’s go to the welfare office together!
>>69
It didn’t happen.
It didn’t happen.
So this story ends here.
>>69
So I died.
Only those who have properly read ZIGA and used the commander-chan’s standard form should laugh at the nameless who haven’t read Miichan.
>>70
I will laugh out loud because I even made a reservation purchase.
A manga I want to continue reading but don’t want to pay for.
>>71
It’s okay because I can read without paying.
Mi… Miichan!? That wound signifies something unusual, It will continue…
To explain to those who haven’t read the original, Mii-chan, despite receiving a million hits, shows a relaxed expression while heading to work at a cabaret club (after this, the manager tells her that her face is all bruised and not to come to work, causing her to get angry).
>>74
Don’t get defensive.
They say the penalties for absenteeism aren’t that harsh, so they won’t impose them.
Mii-chan, who can’t work, is simply troubled because she can’t make money to give to her boyfriend.
If there were at least one decent person in the family…
>>83
Muu-chan was lucky to be picked up by a counselor in prison.
Mii-chan is…
Episode 1: Mii-chan Dies
Episode 2: Mii-chan studies.
Episode 3: Mii-chan engages in pillow sales.
Episode 4: Mii-chan has a lot of sex.
Episode 5: Mii-chan is recommended to go to the welfare center.
Episode 6: Mii-chan buys a hamster.
Episode 7: Mii-chan Encounters Developmental Disabilities
Episode 8: Mii-chan is being wiretapped.
Episode 9: Mii-chan Gets Hit
Episode 10: Mii-chan is born.
Chapter 11: Mii-chan is treated as a disabled person.
Knowing this guideline allows you to follow the story even if you’re not familiar with the original work.
>>87
What a worthless manga, huh?!
>>87
It’s just that, how should I put it, a little gentle touch…
>>87
It seems you know about the guidelines, but there are some responses a bit higher that suggest you’re not keeping up with the conversation or are just throwing in random comments…?
>>87
Finally reached episode 11…?
>>93
Huh…?
The sixth episode seems incredibly peaceful.
What themes are there besides a sideshow?
If it’s a work that seriously deals with borders, there are already others.
>>93
It seems that there is no Japanese text provided for translation. Please provide the text you would like to be translated.
It’s a common situation for people with disabilities to have a meltdown when they are clearly in the wrong but get called out (from their own perspective, they feel scolded). I thought it was a relatable scene.
I don’t understand people who view it as a sideshow.
>>99
There are plenty of stories that deal with the tragedy of people with disabilities.
There are people who start talking about themes, but when reading manga, there’s no need to worry about themes, right? Have you ever thought about what the theme of One Piece even is?
It’s a word that only comes out when I want to hit.
The author has a condescending attitude, which I dislike.
On the contrary, I feel like it’s not permissible in this day and age…
Isn’t it a manga that hits on disabled people?
>>102
Certainly, it is being physically hit in the story…
>>102
It’s okay because it has a social message underneath.
>>102
– A woman is writing.
– Non-fiction
Otherwise, complaints will come flying in.
>>117
Um, it clearly says “fiction” in the work introduction section.
>>122
Well, if the author uses a story they heard from an acquaintance as is, there are issues, so it’s a slightly arranged nonfiction…
>>126
Well, in that case, it’s correct as a genre to be fiction.
>>122
Of course, it can’t be depicted from each character’s subjective perspective, so there are many fictional elements.
But aren’t they saying it’s based on a true story?
>>102
Reading this and having that impression seems problematic!
There’s no value in using templates, right?
It’s interesting that, unlike the great citizens who won’t get mad if you haven’t read it, there are people here who will genuinely get angry if you haven’t read it.
>>104
I guess I’m angry because the other person hasn’t read the work that I’ve read.
On the contrary, the great citizen is simply not interested because he hasn’t read it.
It is an egoism that young anonymous people are prone to fall into.
>>104
See, the subject matter we’re dealing with… that’s why…
>>104
When you read it, you might think “Was it that kind of scene!?” but for the great citizens, it seems to match the impression you get from the pages that are posted.
>>93
The author originally aimed to create malicious content to go viral.
It feels like the serious welfare elements mixed in are from the editing side.
It’s fun to play around by collaging or cutting things out, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that the manga you read will be interesting.
Do I really have to explain something like that now?
It’s fine if you can vaguely perceive it after reading the theme.
Isn’t the theme or direction indicated in the first episode?
It’s a manga that reminisces about a friend with a mental disability who was killed.
There is definitely something that makes you want to make others read it.
It’s a story about Mii-chan living her best for 12 months, even though she is clumsy…
It’s just a serialized version of Diana, right?
In other words, great citizens can’t read later works even if they want to…
Something like that happened at work, so it’s affecting my mental state.
I didn’t expect to be yelled at even though I was teaching.
After that, I started to convey my wishes as “I would like you to ◯◯” instead of giving instructions or orders.
A buffet-style where you can do your favorite work whenever you like.
There are some idiots who are trying to look down on the author for some reason, but no matter how you think about it, the author who is working hard on their creative activities is far more admirable.
There is someone who became the model for Mii-chan, but it’s fiction.
The conversation about human disabilities becomes contentious.
It would be better to make it a yokai instead of a human.
I’m enjoying it, so I don’t intend to say anything, but the word “impressive” seems a bit off…
You don’t really have to read it in the first place.
You’re just getting scolded for trying to mention the content.
>>129
Shall we stop being angry?
Can you do it?
I prefer it to just painting pretty pictures and saying “angels, angels”…
>>127
Say it more like a barista uncle.
It might end up looking like a beast’s mansion.
A work that is both in poor taste and thought-provoking can coexist.
If this becomes a social issue, even stupid udon will become one too!
>>138
Udon-chan is normally a socially conscious person, right?
It was non-fiction, but the author faced various challenges and ended up treating it as fiction, so… it seems they weren’t really thinking much since it was originally intended to depict both truths and lies to aim for a buzz.
“Social issues can be a convenient word that can also be used ironically.”
It needs to be treated like the 24-hour TV event.
There are bad taste topics in reality as well, so I can’t help but feel a bit uncomfortable with how openly they are exposed.
>>143
I think they just want to criticize the bulletin board and anonymous users without thinking about anything else.
People who just look at the posted images and act like they’ve read the work are going to be disliked in any piece.
>>144
You’re just being bothered by it.
Using something that is simply a personal feeling of discomfort as a weapon is really on the same level as Mii-chan…
It’s okay to think about aliens while watching Dragon Ball.
It’s not worth ridiculing just because there are such anonymous people.
It’s fine to do whatever you want with your personal webcomic, but is it okay to commercially pick it up…?
>>147
To be honest, as long as it gets a reaction and people read it, I don’t really care what it is because it can lead them to the site…
>>147
On the contrary, I don’t understand what you think is wrong.
Are you saying that it’s not okay to portray people with disabilities in works? Are you a racist?
There are people who are incredibly shaken by this work as if it were their own…
>>148
It seems that Mii-chan and Muu-chan’s actions and the way they are treated by those around them are resonating with me…
>>148
I often hear stories about kids in the entertainment industry having fans.
I don’t intend to act like a saint.
I just want to get excited about bad taste topics, so if you can’t get into it, please go home.
But I’m glad I found it at Kodansha.
If it were being done on Jump+, it would probably end up with a preachy tone.
You should read it…!
“The Virgin Liangshan Marsh” is…!
I don’t think you need to read it, anyway.
That being said, if you misunderstand without reading, you will just be provoked.
It seems that those who get hurt by something like this probably read emotional pornography regularly.
You should read it with a bigger smile.
It’s fine if you haven’t read it, but you’re just being picked on because you’re pretending to know things you don’t.
I think it definitely deepens understanding of disabilities much more than the 24-hour television does.
>>162
I don’t want to get involved, and to be honest, I think that’s the right thing to do.
>>161
It looks unreadable.
>>163
Just because I couldn’t read it, don’t certify others either.
>>171
Wow… I really can’t read it…
>>164
What is this guy talking about?
The author is seriously angry, isn’t he?
The other day, there was even someone who was finally taking secret photos.
>>166
Eh, scary…
It’s better not to read the original work other than DB!
As a result of deepening my understanding
Wow, that’s disgusting. It’s just a matter of individual characteristics that make me want to stay away.
Perhaps a true saint, moved by pity, may be born and take action.
>>169
Dr. Suzaki is also doing the bulletin board.
The other day, there was someone who was angry, assuming that the author was here in this thread…
What does it mean to be taken advantage of on X or Kindle?
>>172
It doesn’t convey anything at all, but isn’t it just a feeling of that magnitude for the person involved?
I think the image in the thread is a good work because it doesn’t try to beautify disabilities.
Even the inability to cut the cake had a slight embellishment.
>>175
The feeling of discomfort when watching is the way this type is handled.
If you properly write about the true extent of the situation as it is, it should lead to empathy and understanding.
At the time of the release on X, it seems there was a shift towards attacking the author.
There are only things like that over there.
I really don’t like it.
I really don’t like it.
I really hate it!!
Mii-chan, this manga is unpleasant…
>>179
It’s your fault, right?
>>186
Uwaaaaaaaah!!
>>186
That tendency to blame everything on others is Mimi herself.
It seems that they don’t understand that it’s a pattern specific to individuals with intellectual disabilities.
I don’t think this author is someone who can be praised as a compliment, but it feels like there are seriously anonymous people who hate them, and that’s just weird…
What is voyeurism?
If there is a right to express that one wants discrimination to stop because it promotes discrimination, isn’t it only the parties involved who have that right?
Saying something like that here will only serve as fuel for provocation.
Beast Mansion!?