data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2d61/b2d61df08905c61a3c7a2969ecaf52fefa6d6a8b" alt=""
It’s a rude homage to Zeropan.
>>1
Can we do something about that zero pan being incredibly boring?
If you’re going to blow something away, please blow away Zero Pan first, I beg you.
If the readers’ reception is poor, it will reset, so I think it would be good to praise it every week.
>>3
So why isn’t the zero pan reset…?
Is there a need to read it?
If you’re changing it for the readers’ sake, please change the zero-pan.
I wonder what criteria they use to decide on a redo.
>>7
Since I can’t do the power-up development with the first two, I have to give the secret scroll to Sonic Flash!
On top of that, for some reason, they introduced the element of a partner for Blast, which led to a fundamental breakdown as they moved forward.
Once you have officially released something, do not redo it multiple times.
It’s on a level that makes you feel like it only aired for one season in anime.
Why doesn’t Zeropan start over?
Maybe it’s better to balance it out by deleting about 10 episodes of ONE.
The publishing side that allows such selfishness is crazy.
If the thread image is headed that way, I wonder if they’ll finish it with a one-punch just like in the original work…
A manga that allows you to experience being caught in a loop.
Did something change?
(I’m not really that interested in Blast to begin with…)
>>15
This is the hardest part…
Thanks to Zeropan, I became the strongest in all manga.
Defeating one-way traffic with zero fertilized egg bread!
Honestly, I don’t really understand what the true history was.
>>17
The ONE version is the official canon.
How are you?
No matter how many times I try, it’s impossible to establish the blast, Mr. Murata.
It’s okay to draw the final boss now.
I wonder if ONE has properly created the settings for Blast?
>>22
Has ONE ever created a character that directly quotes the abilities of a Marvel hero like that?
>>29
What about Zombie Man and the others…?
>>29
The heroes created by ONE are basically tough and powerful, and even if they have special abilities, they tend to be simple psychic powers or energy waves.
Saitama quickly noticed the abnormality.
Please defeat the fake Phantom Blast.
I don’t understand the criteria for resetting.
What was the quality of the tournament chapter all about?
It’s fine that Blast is here.
Don’t try to make me join the blast.
“Did we want to have this exchange before?”
“…! I was feeling the same way.”
It starts to seem questionable whether they are properly summarizing the plot and maintaining consistency in their writing.
At least there is no feeling that ONE is writing it at all.
Spent too much time on the weapon acquisition event…
Removing the part where Sonic steals the sword and hands it over to Flash, and instead having Saitama give a shallow lecture, is definitely not ONE’s sense.
No way they would ever change the ending, no matter what.
The only manga I know that gets redone if the development is poorly received is One Punch Man.
Once you draw a manga, it’s something you can never take back.
>>35
Normally, I don’t do that.
Because you will lose trust.
If the story changed completely each time it was redrawn, it would be enjoyable.
I wouldn’t be surprised if a villain suddenly showed up and acted as an S-class hero.
Blast is just wandering around casually, and no matter how much I search, I can’t find Tatsumaki and Blue…
I’m punishing the readers who are complaining about Zero Pan by giving them a taste of Zero Pan to make them understand.
😎
🤜∞🤛
It was nice when Blast first appeared in the Garou arc because there was still a sense of surprise.
It’s amazing how there are so many opportunities to shine, yet there’s no appeal at all.
>>43
Isn’t it a problem to reveal the charm of the mysterious S-class Rank 1 hero too clearly?
I thought the ONE version was some kind of previous round.
Well, the Murata version is fine now.
Please update the original work already.
The good thing about Murata’s version is that the artwork is skillful, and we don’t need Murata’s ego.
>>47
Huh? The nail bat is an S-class of justice, so it’s a misunderstanding to think it belongs to the Neo Heroes, right?
>>57
It’s crazy to diss the original work with my nonsensical interpretation when I’m in a position to borrow it.
Can we do something about the blast design even now?
I was interested in Blast, the number 1 hero who is missing in that world.
When they showed up, all the expectations of their unfathomable depths blew away, and they turned into a boring character that could be found anywhere.
Honestly, I don’t really like chabudai either.
I want to see the part where Saitama beats you up and says, “You wanted to be a hero, right?”
The ending of the latest episode is strange.
The cliffhangers in each episode are what ONE is most particular about.
It’s becoming suspicious that it is often said, “ONE is also involved in the revisions.”
>>52
Is it about time…?
The appeal of Blast and God lies in their mysterious identities, but by oddly positioning them at the core of the story, they have lost all their charm.
>>53
The Murata version gives form to something whose true identity is unknown and whose appearance is unspecified, ruining it in the process.
What was initially sought after and became a topic of discussion was Murata’s drawing skills, while also redoing One Punch Man and enhancing the roles of the somewhat mediocre heroes from the original work.
>>54
That “hero who had a mediocre presence in the original work” has started to shine in the original, so it would be great if they just faithfully followed the original.
Don’t change it weirdly.
What I’m doing is gravity manipulation! A warp gate! It’s really silly, isn’t it?
I really hate the foreign body sensation of the blast.
It’s just Murata’s original character.
I wonder if I overextended myself because the multiverse is trending and I wanted to try drawing it too.
Did you decide to blame everything on Murata?
>>59
No matter how much they say I’m brainstorming ideas together with ONE,
The recent update of the original work was interesting, and the Murata version was terrible, so it’s natural to think that way…
>>59
It’s no longer possible to dismiss it as something “the internet is just saying.”
The way it is depicted is clearly different from the original.
>>82
Moreover, the ONE version is interesting.
>>59
The biggest difference between the ONE version and the Murata version is the characters’ thoughts and monologues.
Is the Murata version, where thoughts and monologues seem to be entirely removed, more interesting?
I’m continuously fighting at a transcendent level, and it’s not like I’m just not showing up; I’m always present.
I’m just a bored old man…
There is a theory circulating on the internet that manga becomes boring due to the editors’ influence.
Without an editor, it’s like, “Alright, let’s redo this whole year—it’s all for the elevation of artistry,” and that’s what this unique existence teaches me.
The readers’ reception of Saitama doesn’t matter, but if Blast’s reception is bad, it needs to be wiped out.
I liked how Blast’s costume had that handmade, cheap feel like a jersey.
I wonder how long they’re planning to talk about that person.
It seems that last year’s updates have mostly been forgotten.
>>69
There are somehow two New Year’s illustrations!
Clearly made the scale of the story bigger from Garou.
It’s clear that I’ve gone crazy from being over-influenced by Marvel movies.
I laughed when you started talking about how you redid it and the void happened again.
I wonder how obsessed they are with this setting.
You can rest assured that the parts that have been turned into a single volume cannot be changed.
I’m starting to feel pity for Blast, who becomes a boring guy no matter how many times he tries again.
The origin of manga is the power balance between Saitama and everything else, so it’s fine to exaggerate it, but one must not go overboard.
>>74
It’s a bit disappointing to see Garou starting to go head-to-head with Saitama.
>>78
I wonder what that strength graph is all about…
The most original element of the Murata version and also the one that is unfairly favored the most is Blast.
Blast is probably the god of the world.
A person with the ability to obliterate their work until it improves because it doesn’t resonate well with readers.
>>76
It’s Murata, right?
If you can redo something, you’ll become careless, of course.
After seeing the color version of Blast, it looks even more uncool. What is it about this that has Murata-sensei so excited?
They’re stretching the gag part that was half of the original source a bit too much.
Do the popular Amime mask edition quickly.
It’s bad to use the ability to summon skills without any intention of using the secret techniques of the scroll.
It was good that the scene where Zombie Man is trampled by Garou as if making excuses was gone.
>>84
No, that’s not good.
That’s precisely because of that scene…
That person is a justice S-class, so getting one-punched by Saitama is a misunderstanding, right?
But if I reset like this, it won’t happen that I can’t catch up with the original work and continue writing…
>>86
Say that after you catch up.
What is zero bread?
I guess it’s enough to just look at the original work.
It’s just full of male characters, so it’s really too gay of a part.
If you’re going to redo the Tatsumaki arc, I can still forgive you, but don’t keep redoing this stinky guy part over and over.
In the first place, Blast has a look that really appeals to hardcore homosexuals.
>>93
It’s not just in Blast, but Murata’s drawing style has a lot of things that feel strangely homoerotic…
>>102
The scene where Saitama places his hand on Genos’ chest while Sperm, Garou, and Flash are fighting is quite homoerotic.
It’s a story from a long time ago, but what page was the original name of Phoenix Man?
The conclusion of Garou hasn’t been released in a comic yet, but I wonder how far the third season of the anime will go…
It is believed that Murata is drawing the names because there is no ONE-specific character that has a cluttered explanation dialogue in one panel.
It’s an unpleasant coincidence that the title of the one-shot I drew before One Punch is BLUST.
Did you also get rid of the idea of killing that kid?
I’m not quite sure about the ending of the Murata version of the Garou arc.
I finally reached the point where I thought, “That’s enough…” and ended up selling the manga volumes.
I’ll probably redo it this time too, so I’ll read it from next time.
I’m trying to turn Void into a good guy somehow.
I think it’s fine to treat it as if I was buried after being beaten outside of the conversation by someone everyone is always afraid of.
That’s the flavor of ONE.
An illustration machine shouldn’t have a consciousness.
No, it’s okay if you can’t catch up with the original work anymore.
Just keep doing it under the title “Blast.”
No, the original work was crap too.
It was really boring.
I used to think that the boring scenes in Eyeshield were due to Leech Rho, but now there’s a possibility that Murata thought of it.
>>108
I don’t know where you think it’s boring, but Reach Low has its own excessive aspects as well.
The depiction of the blast that is excessively being forced in feels too obstructive in many ways…
In other words, changing the depiction and conclusion of characters that are quite central to the story is no longer just a level of arrangement anymore.
The worst part about the Murata version of Garou is that in the end, he returns to Bang’s place.
Considering the aftermath of the original work, it completely ruins all the good qualities of the characters.
>>111
The original work has its pros and cons, as the hero retires irresponsibly without training a successor.
>>124
It’s not about Bang’s later story, but about Garou’s later story.
Well, I don’t think Bang is being that irresponsible since he’s also taking responsibility and retiring.
>>141
It’s too irresponsible to retire while having let Garou escape and disappear.
I wonder why I stopped using the chabudai…
The opportunity for a rewrite reset should be limited to once when the paperback is released and once when the deluxe edition is released, for a total of two times.
The original version is always interesting with each update, so I enjoy that.
While the Amaimask and the S-Class heroes were saying to kill Garou, only Saitama was trying to save him in the original story.
I thought it was a terrible change when Saitama was blankly watching Garou being lynched and then started joining in when the spiked bat said to stop.
If you’re going to dig into the Void, you should have had Saitama take care of it with one punch first and then mentioned it in Blast’s lines…
It’s better than drawing a long, boring development.
I thought it was interesting that the boring perfect character Yamato from Eyeshield said he looks just like Blast.
I thought Murata was no good since the time he used a full-color flip book for the introduction of Metal Knight.
The original work has been continuously providing interesting updates, but the Murata version has been strange in terms of both content and the way it’s updated for a long time.
In that case, it wouldn’t be strange to think that Murata, who is at the core of the Murata version’s production, is the cause, yet for some reason, the insistence of “Don’t blame Mr. Murata!” keeps appearing, which is a bit unsettling.
>>120
If you say that Murata is completely at fault, then why doesn’t ONE say anything about it in the end?
>>137
This is really boring, so can you just return it to the way I did it?
There’s no way I can say that; Murata is in a higher position, after all…
>>137
As far as the operation of the work goes, that’s true, but if we pinpoint “why it isn’t interesting,” it’s definitely Murata’s fault, right?
>>120
I’ve often heard that not stopping One is also bad.
That’s originally the job of the editor or something, not the original work…
>>164
No…
>>170
Even though I’m hired as the original creator, I have to negotiate too…
I heard it’s still in front of the chabudai in the paperback version, is that true?
The comedy routine between Garou and the artist, who is so well-versed in metal bats that they can criticize the original work, was amazing.
I also want to draw ONE.
I already drew it, or something like that.
Even if you’re told, just stop it.
I clearly think that the editing is not functioning.
I can’t control it.
>>126
It’s not that it was originally like that, but rather…
There’s no editor.
>>126
Editor: “Do it.”
Murata: “Yes…”
There is also a possibility.
>>126
In the first place, the editing started with a contract that did not allow for input on the content, so even if I wanted to, I can’t say anything.
It seems that the delivery part-time job Garou won’t be able to be seen in Murata.
>>127
It seems like you’re just moving around uselessly.
>>132
It seems like there’s a scene with some incredible movement inserted for a few frames.
It seems like it could fill about a page with mobs reacting to that.
>>127
Even though I should be at Bang’s place, it seems like I’m also working part-time in delivery for some reason.
The original work is like that, and ONE has other works that are also properly interesting.
When I start to think about who is to blame, it makes me feel sad.
>>128
But in the end, the best-selling work based on ONE’s original is this one.
It’s annoying when they tweak the original episodes and ruin them, it’s like they’re just messing around.
Why is the animation device giving opinions on the scenario and characters?
I understand things related to paintings, but…
In the Murata version, was King cutting apples?
>>133
It hasn’t changed at all from the original.
>>133
There is a possibility that it could be considered as something that was cut at any time, since it wouldn’t be strange to rewrite the past.
There is no logical reason for ONE to go this far.
If you’re going to redo it, then just start over and redraw the Garou arc exactly as in the original.
The original Garou wanted to play at being a monster but couldn’t fully commit to being a murderer, and was a half-hearted individual who secretly wanted to be a hero, which was recognized as a mitigating circumstance.
The Murata version is an evil villain who will kill someone if no one stops him, and he hasn’t reflected on anything; he was swayed into joining the hero side and became a worthless piece of trash… It’s not right for someone like that to be alive.
I laughed at the fact that they re-drew the scene with a lot of characters from the ninja village about three times, and I don’t understand why.
>>140
Moreover, it becomes more exaggerated every time I redraw it.
If I end it by saying I returned it to its original sheath, what would happen to Charanko’s position…?
>>143
Know the pain of my “best disciple,” Charanko!
Just read the paperback!
>>146
I don’t need it… or rather, I stopped buying it around the time the martial arts tournament ended.
ONE’s drawing ability is getting better, so we don’t need Murata anymore.
Even though the episode with Amaida hasn’t aired yet, McCoy knows the true identity.
From the beginning, there are too many questionable points, such as assuming Neo is a villain and other aspects unrelated to Blast.
I think the worst part is the poor conclusion of the Garou arc.
You can’t cut out the scene where Saitama sharply sees through what Garou really wanted to do.
>>151
I wish we had the chabudai.
>>155
But I can’t imagine Murata being able to write a drama from that point.
If you’re going to redraw it anyway, I want you to redesign Webigazza-chan.
Especially around the eyes.
I liked the invincible Saitama after all, and I didn’t need Garou to come close to his strength.
What is that graph?
What’s different from the Murata version is that in the Murata version, there is a master-like character doing the same thing in front of the King.
Since there are also other works like Versus and Bug Ego that have their original stories, it’s like saying that for One Punch, where there is already an original, it’s fine to stick to the original story.
If you don’t think the content of the story is unimportant, you can’t redraw it this many times.
I think the chabudai was inserted with the premise of being changed, as the prank went too far.
The problem is that there is a habit of endlessly making meaningless modifications.
In the first place, this project started with me wanting to have my poorly drawn picture redrawn.
Rather than saying the chabudai is good, it’s that Saitama and Zero Pan, who seem to be catching up to Garou’s strength after the changes, are all unnecessary.
What does it mean to prepare it with the premise of changing it? I don’t get it at all.
It seems like they’re regretting releasing Kamen and Blast.
>>171
No… I’m still the same even with rewriting, and I don’t regret it.
>>171
If you regret it, you can just zero-pan there, so you’re still feeling good now, right?
It’s impressive how they defend that it’s ONE’s fault for not stopping.
It’s no different from saying that Murata is a guy who is not only boring but also drags others down.
>>172
It’s not that ONE is bad; that has nothing to do with Murata.
>>172
It’s a common understanding from any position…
Murata said in an interview that redraws don’t receive payment, so if ONE had Murata do a year’s worth of redraws for free, it would go beyond just workplace harassment, which means the only possibility is that Murata is doing it on his own.
Murata is so annoying, and since there’s already an original work, I guess it’s like “do whatever you want.”
At the point when the Garou arc reached that stage, it was already impossible to make any corrections.
I don’t understand why you want to talk about such gods and blasts before the original work.
It’s not that I won’t say anything, but ONE has long since stated that all the revisions have been done by Murata-sensei and it’s all wrapped up…
If this statement is repeated many times, it will become shifting blame, and it is indeed correct that I can no longer say anything.
It’s quite a difficult situation to think that ONE is absolutely not at fault, right?
In the first place, what Murata is drawing on his own is just imagination.
>>178
If ONE is making this happen, it’s impossible for it to be this boring.
The updates for other series and original versions are quite interesting, but the style is just too different.
>>178
It’s unreasonable to say that it’s their fault for not stopping.
It’s a normal issue with the original work if they don’t properly intervene or check the names.
Blast is too overrated for an S-rank number one.
Even though Saitama is in a sacred domain, it feels frustrating that he doesn’t appear in the original work.
Murata’s latest lines about baldness lack the ONE feeling completely.
Regardless of the name, they keep babbling incoherently while considering Sonic.
Super redundant and no sharpness typical of ONE.
Don’t waste your effort trying to fix the inconsistencies in the story.
The original work is being properly shown, right?
Because there are ONE supremacists.
There was a character in Eyeshield that looks like Blast, I wonder if the author likes them.
It’s not good to make assumptions about the situation on site.
I really want the author themselves to have a platform to express things since they are only misunderstood.
“Please upload it as a one-off on YouTube, like the staff of Bozaro.”
It was suspicious from the first time with Fenio.
Because the bald guy was messing around, Garou killed Genos and spread radiation, rendering the heroes incapable of recovery, but Zero-Pan saved the world.
The end
You can’t rewrite it without the original author’s approval…
Is ONE Murata’s mom?
If your hands move on their own like that,
I wish they would draw a spin-off about Tatsumaki…
Actually, the ideal situation would be for Murata to be in charge of the original story and artwork instead of ONE, since he’s busy and his writing is slow…
I wonder why they make changes and stretch things out.