Well, if it’s too simple, you can tell without even having to pull that it’s strong or weak.

Well, should I use the Alterios formula from next time…?

I can’t quite understand where the buffs in social games are applied just by looking at the game itself.

After all, the difference between attack power and defense power is the easiest to understand.

I wish they would stop saying that things like Hoyoba have a different value even with the same attack power +5%.

In games like FEH, the damage is simply calculated as attack minus defense, even further simplified by removing critical hits and dodges, and the character parameter categories have also become fewer.
It’s difficult to create a difference in character, and it was inflating endlessly at an incredible pace.
I understand that it’s become this way because what we’re aiming for is closer to a puzzle game than a simulation, but it’s a bit of a double-edged sword.

Look at Puzzle & Dragons.
I’m adjusting it by manipulating the damage cap.

It’s troublesome that when the attack power increase (small) is hidden as a multiplier, I have to calculate and investigate it from the damage formula.

The image in the thread shows that pilots have statuses, but there is no explanation of how those statuses function at all.
The unit’s attack power is over 10,000, while the pilot’s is in the three digits, but it’s really unclear how this affects anything.

If you understand that the game is solid beyond what the player thinks, then you can trust it.

G data is good because even if you don’t understand the relationships of the numbers, you can still increase it significantly to boost damage.

It’s definitely about dice calculations.

The basics are ATK-DEF, but there are also adjustments based on hit counts like ATK 0.5 × 3 and 1.2 × 1.

This attack will be treated as ◯◯.
It seems to be getting more and more complicated.

Well, things like this will probably see inflation later on, so it may not be essential after all.
If you’re not going to spend a lot, it’s better to securely get what you want.

Since Camille had a particularly high status, it feels like there will be people who care about that.

Rather, the thread image is the simpler one, right?

It’s not as complicated as it sounds; it’s just that buffs can be additive or multiplicative and their effects can vary in position.

I would like to have some understanding of the buff effects on the player side.
I want the law to punish things like massive markups.

I was glad to have a means of recovery when my Camille in URz targets weak opponents, and even after crushing the defense side, the escort target still takes damage.

Do you want to play a game that still uses Alterios these days?
Sometimes I think that’s fine for a standalone indie game, but…

It seems like everyone is concerned about skill multipliers, but the basic stats are also important, right?

It’s fine if it’s single-digit damage like Marist, right, Alterios?

There were many complaints about not changing Alterioth in the Dragon Quest 3 remake.

G-ETA has damage prediction, so it’s not inconvenient even if the formula is like that.

The thread image has a rather subtle bonus for damage dealt and damage taken based on the compatibility of the third ability, according to the calculations.
People who are not very familiar with it tend to prioritize that and organize accordingly.

G Generation doesn’t really understand awakening and response well.

In this game, isn’t it more important to increase the unit’s attack power rather than the pilot’s damage dealt?

Also over here.

Because the pilot side is more important.
It has a balance that can resist even against a full member with 3 stars.

First of all, Dragon Quest III is not Alterios itself, right?

By the way, the development side is also creating a similar Excel spreadsheet to make calculations!

It’s hard to understand when they say something like “It goes up roughly! It goes up a little!” but then when they say “It’s 143% damage!” sometimes I’m like, what!?

Dragon Quest math is a part of Altherios, but that’s true.
When you say “we’re together,” it somehow feels different again.

I understand that you just want to say “Arterios,” so can you stop?

When I tried searching for it, it seems to be related to the topic enough to come up as the third suggestion.
Rather, why are Arknights and Heavens’ Burning up there?

Which is stronger, a 100 difference in pilot status or an attack burst?
Specifically, between Sretta and Gato, which one has higher damage?

Instead of making it unnecessarily complicated, we have to start simple and gradually differentiate the additional characters, and that’s how it becomes complex.

It will become complex, but if there are too few elements in the formula, it will be difficult to differentiate.

Is it true that having the ◯◯ tag on a unique ability results in only a ◯% boost that isn’t very strong?

Isn’t it true that such complex calculations and skill explanations are unique to mobile games from China and Korea?

Expressions like “super up” are already difficult to understand, and it’s not acceptable that there are games with the same skill name and wording but different internal multipliers.

Small, Medium, Large, Extra Large, Super Large

Even if the numbers and formulas are written down, I can’t understand them, but I want them to be provided because smart people can calculate and tell me whether they’re useful or not.

The second one posted above on X is easy to understand.
Even though there is a 25% difference in the damage percentage, due to the status difference, Camille’s damage is significantly higher than Shiro’s.

As you can see from games like Paper Mario and Fire Emblem, the Alterios method is an excellent system as long as it can fit within two digits, even if it has a large number of digits.

Granblue Fantasy has become so incomprehensible that even if they add new strong limited characters, I feel like it’s still… strong…?

Doo-chan and others who don’t know the formulas say that the mobile armor tag is easy to use and tough!
The defense value is too low, so it’s actually tougher to use a pilot with over 600 that was distributed for free.

The more complex the calculation formula becomes, the more appreciated the adjustments at the final stage are.

The biggest problem with G Generation is that the evade type is inherently useless…
Doo-chan is weak because of that too.

I think the damage cut effect of the game in the thread image should just be kept as the final cut.
I wonder if that’s why, as various damage reductions increase later on, it could end up being a 100% cut.

If we’re talking about status, if you draw Rakan, you have to use Rakan, right?

Why is Lacan’s defense higher than UR Mika’s and Amuro’s…?

If you are going to do the same thing as other social games
A system to cover Lacan with a pull skin will be implemented soon!

Aren’t there too many quoted replies where we can’t have a conversation?

The multiplier in Super Robot Wars is often multiplied in the final calculation.

In Gundam, most of the characters aren’t engaging in conversation, so it’s no surprise that noname users who can’t communicate appear in the Gundam threads.

I want a one-time purchase version of FEH with a skill set from before the evasion skills were introduced.
I loved that thinking was simple and had a good sense of operation.

It’s lame to make off-target comments without being able to read the text and then run away without saying anything when you get embarrassed…

Managing everything with a separate multiplication method can be quite unfavorable for social games that anticipate future additions.
Unless you are as straightforward as the Infinite Count Gundam.

If it’s CS, I can at least keep an eye on the balance until the end.
Social games are limitless…

One interesting aspect of the damage calculation formula in G Generation is
When facing an opponent with similar parameters, the importance of the defense parameter is high, so Justice (Asran) performs excellently.
When the parameters are far from the opponent, the importance of the HP parameter is high, so Gundam (Amuro) has high performance.
It’s clever to make it so that various aircraft become the optimal solution under different rules.

At first, it may have a simple combat system, but later it can become a big mess with too many new elements added.
Chinese games have a lot of elements that feel like they are in the third year of Japanese mobile games from the very beginning.

The damage calculation formula in G Generation is really well done.

It’s not limited to Chinese games, but I want them to stop adding unknown buffs unique to that character.

The social game I’m playing uses an attack power minus defense power calculation, which I think is easy to adjust and a good formula.

I only did the beginning and then left it untouched.
If Camille is strong, I want to do it again.
The gacha seems to be tough…

To make it an infinite number…

If it’s a one-time purchase, it’s fine to balance it up to the final boss battle, so as long as any calculation formula is properly designed, there shouldn’t be a problem. However, for ongoing operations, if it continues for 2 or 3 years, inflation will inevitably occur…

You can’t even do a follow-up copy.

Sirocco is not limited, so you can pull for him if you slip through, but Camille is limited, so you have to wait for a rerun.

I wonder if the calculation complexity auto will create a few millimeters remaining…

I feel like I’ve seen that the pace of reprints is relatively fast, but I can’t remember the source.

It’s a story not limited to mobile games, but a formula.
It’s not just simple if it’s for consumers.

Because there are free-to-play Camille and Z.
It’s fine to enjoy Camille outside of end content.

Free-to-play Camille is weak, so if you want to play with a strong Camille, you’ll have to wait for a rerun.

If it’s just this level, it would be the same for a complete purchase game, right?
The purchase of G Generation is similar, and Super Robot Wars is like this too.

There is a formula where occasionally, if the level is raised too high due to excessive complexity, a phenomenon occurs where it becomes weaker.

That’s fine for CS, but when it comes to something like social games, it’s different.