Narrow it down to the screen size and resolution.

Put out 100,000 yen.

If you’re fine with 4K at 60fps, there are plenty of options to choose from and you can buy them cheaply.

Let’s add HDR too.

I think a giga crystal of the desired size should be good.

If it’s just a 27-inch 4K, you can find one for around 30,000 yen.

It doesn’t seem like you have a strong preference, so you could probably buy a regular 4K monitor with that budget.

You could buy something like the DELL S2725QC.

If it’s for gaming, I don’t think there’s any problem, but if you’re going to use it with a PC via DP connection, it’s better to choose one that can always keep DP hot plug detection enabled.

Are you satisfied with such a small screen? Don’t you want to buy a bigger one?

If it’s too big, it can sometimes make it hard to concentrate!

Even finding 4K pixels for a 40-inch was tough, so what’s the point of buying anything smaller?

A man silently enjoys the overwhelming power of a 60-inch screen.

If you buy something half-hearted, you should think that its performance is worse than the monitor of the Switch 2.

They say it’s above FHD, but now it’s actually harder to find monitors that are below FHD.

What does being half-hearted mean?

Seriously, monitors are getting cheaper and cheaper.

Haven’t a lot of manufacturers increased while we haven’t seen each other for a while?
It must be of Chinese origin, but it’s ridiculously cheap.

It’s hard to know how to choose electronic products, isn’t it?
The prices can vary greatly depending on the manufacturer, even with the same specifications.

Even if they say it’s the same, there are quite a few differences in the details.

It’s cheap, but it feels like they’re cutting corners in various ways…

I was just looking for a monitor for the RLGA AElieX too.
I was surprised to find one that connects with Type-C, supports 65W power delivery, and has FHD 120Hz for under 20,000 yen.

Don’t just look at inches and Hz, pay attention to the response speed too.

It would be good to have something like 144Hz or a slightly faster FPS.

If you don’t intend to use it on a PC, I think a TV is better than a monitor.
A 40-inch 4K monitor with performance capable of handling gaming is many times more expensive than a TV.

Well, if you can spend up to 60,000 yen, I think the response speed and other aspects should be fine as long as you don’t choose something really strange…

I don’t think there’s much point in having 4K for a gaming monitor.

It’s also a good idea to buy from a physical store considering initial defects!
It’s really helpful that they can come to exchange it right away at a nearby physical store…

AW2725DM 27-inch WQHD \34,400
XG27ACS 27-inch WQHD \37,800
AW2725QF 27-inch 4k \77,799
XG27UCG 27-inch 4K ¥79,979

I’m thinking of going around here.
I’m struggling because 4K is expensive.

It seems like you don’t have as many strong preferences as I thought, so I think you can just buy whatever you like.

Before deciding whether it’s 4K or not, I think you first need to determine how far away you’ll be from the monitor so that you can decide on the size and resolution.

I want one with a VGA port, but it’s probably hard to find one these days.

I plan to buy two XG27ACS when it drops to 358.

What shocked me a moment ago was this.
Even though it’s on sale, it’s amazing to get something with this thumbnail specification at this price.

Amazon.co.jp: INNOCN 27M2V 27-inch Gaming Monitor 4K Mini LED Monitor …

Amazon.co.jp: INNOCN 27M2V 27-inch Gaming Monitor 4K Mini LED Monitor 160Hz/144Hz, 1ms Response Time HDR1000 QD Quantum Dot (no glare…)

amzn.asia

Is Switch2 not going to support external VRR after all?
Well, there’s a possibility that something like that could be added later through a software update, like with the PS5.

JAPAN NEXT is often written about negatively online, but it’s not bad.
It’s a bit annoying that it has an unusually slow boot-up time and the operation buttons are quite hard to press, but other than that, it’s not bad!

I think you should buy a bigger one separately for watching videos in 4K.

In the end, the foundation is the same everywhere.

I bought the monitor only 1 to 2 years ago, and now it has dead pixels, which is really frustrating.
Fortunately, it’s in a position that you can’t see unless you stare at it, but it’s not a cheap purchase, so I want some leniency.

When it comes to something that’s easy to switch inputs, it really has to be one with a remote control…

It’s fine if it’s just the Switch2 and PS5, but if you’re going to connect others as well, you should also check the number of input ports.

If it’s 27, you can choose from the classic I-O, affordable Shao flavor, or the support-throwable Regza monitor (24 is HDMI 2.0, so that’s no good).
If it’s 24, then 20,000 yen is enough.

A 27-inch 4K display doesn’t feel beneficial, so I want at least 31 inches. That might be something you’ve heard everywhere, but let’s keep that in mind.

When I set it to WQHD on a 24-inch, I can’t even see the text while working.

I experienced VRR at the secret exhibition, but to be honest, I could only really tell when it was around 20 FPS.

FHD 24 inch
WQHD 27 inches
4K 32 inches
If you want to demonstrate performance, here’s an image like this.