>>3

Why are we talking about the size of the monitor…?

You did well.

Let’s buy a 4K monitor with HDR1000.

A game with a diverse range of weather patterns like Wiles would have many benefits.

So, do serious gamers change their monitors depending on the game?

If it’s that resolution, a graphics card around 100,000 yen should be fine.

What do you want to do, not revealing the overall specs in this flow…?

Isn’t a 4070 just right for FHD on Wiles?

I at least want WQHD.

Right now, even high-performance WQHD monitors are really cheap…

Since the competition is quite intense, I believe we’re really at a price limit now, so it’s truly the right time to buy a monitor.

I don’t need such specs for FHD…

>>21

Is it equipped with 64GB and the recognized capacity has decreased?

The 5080 is not comfortable in a FHD environment and is excessive.

I don’t know about professional gamers, but I can’t tell the difference once the FPS goes above 120…

https://www.amazon.co.jp/dp/B0DGKW3T2Q

Since it’s not that big or expensive, I recommend replacing it.

I’m using ray tracing in 4K settings on an 85-inch OLED TV, and it’s amazing.

>>27

It’s just a hobby, unlike a professional who makes a living out of it.

Ultimately, as long as I can avoid dangerous situations and satisfy my needs, anything is fine.

Maybe it would be better to buy a cheap Chinese WQHD monitor instead.

https://amzn.asia/d/euEXifl

If you can configure a 5080 and a 9800X3D in this day and age, you can try it out like using disposable tissues.

It’s a loss.

Bulletin board pishi

https://amzn.asia/d/9pfsR6M

I don’t understand why this and that are so different by double.

>>32

Because it’s 60Hz and 180Hz, it’s completely different.

>>32

The latter feels like it’s not suitable for gaming at 60Hz.

Even when listening to the stories of audio enthusiasts, I really think it’s just a world of self-satisfaction…

People with heightened senses who can’t be satisfied unless it’s super high quality seem to have a tough time compared to ordinary people.

If this score comes out, it seems like 4K Ultra is definitely possible.

4K Ultra simply takes up too much space.

>>36

Place?

>>36

Does “Looks like we can go 4K Ultra” not mean that it seems possible even with wild ultra settings on a 4K monitor…?

It’s about the size of the monitor, right?

>>41

Maybe you think “Ultra” means ultra-wide?

I understand that it’s tedious to throw away displays and you don’t want to change them too often.

Simply put, our kotatsu cannot accommodate two 4K TVs.

It’s only natural that the score improves when you lower the resolution…

If it’s FHD, then of course that’s the case.

Is it consuming 2GB when the integrated graphics of Ryzen is enabled?

The unnamed poster doesn’t even bring up topics like what kind of monitor they’re using.

In an FHD environment, it feels like a waste, and there’s no way to expand on the conversation…

If the area is large, the whole thing cannot fit into view, which puts you at a disadvantage in FPS games.

>>53

If you can interpret this story as a discussion about buying a dedicated monitor that you will only use for Monster Hunter for the rest of your life, then that’s a problem.

>>67

Even as a counterargument, it’s too far-fetched.

The size depends on the distance from the monitor, I suppose.

It’s difficult to respond when someone boasts about things that are beyond their means…

A high refresh rate monitor for gaming is great.

The bulletin board becomes really smooth, making scrolling incredibly easy to see.

When you set the display ratio to 150%, which is recommended for 4K, the text becomes very clear and much easier to read, so if you want to make your bulletin board comfortable, a high-end gaming monitor is highly recommended.

It’s beautiful when watching on a 40-inch 4K, but I get really motion sick because the monitor is so close.

>>57

Just use a monitor that fits the size of the room properly…

Is the FHD achieved by breaking through in two minutes after starting the thread?

>>59

Well, anyone would be astonished by FHD.

Well, of course, that’s going to be pointed out.

FHD is already synonymous with the minimum settings… It’s fine, but why did you start a thread about that?

It might be frame rate supremacy…

Aren’t you just reprinting someone else’s image? While wondering that…

The numbers are slightly different, so is the anonymous poster another eccentric person…

They say a big screen is justice, but when I think about looking at the HP bar or items at the edge of the screen during a battle in Monster Hunter, I actually dislike it…

I guess 4K should be at least 27 inches.

Even if you’re a frame rate supremacist, there’s no point in displaying 200fps in Monster Hunter.

If it’s multiplayer games, that’s different.

I ended up settling on WQHD.

Playing Monster Hunter in FHD is normal, but

Those who swing around the 5080 and 9800X3D are crazy.

Damn it! I lost!

Isn’t 60fps enough for Monster Hunter?

The resolution and fps limit is really just a matter of personal preference, but it’s not something to brag about, is it?

Since there aren’t many heavy scenes in this benchmark, the average FPS isn’t very reliable.

It’s not unreasonable to have FHD with this specification, but without imposing FPS limits or power limits.

It might be crazy to whip it around at full power.

Some people can feel a difference up to around 120FPS.

I have no idea at all.

>>80

It’s easy to notice the difference after playing at 120 for a while and then dropping to 60.

People with high-spec PCs are downloading high-resolution textures and having fun, right?

Professional gamers are basically FHD, right?

>>82

That’s when you’re playing a highly competitive game.

>>85

If it’s an action game like Monster Hunter, it’s not really something to deny.

>>89

It’s a discussion about why professional gamers choose Full HD.

I want around 80 fps.

At a distance from the PC monitor, 60fps makes the afterimage from moving the camera quite exhausting.

I’d prefer a fixed frame rate at a specified FPS rather than high FPS that fluctuates due to load.

I really can’t tell the difference with 144Hz.

I feel like Basecamp sometimes becomes really heavy.

>>90

Let’s stabilize in solo mode.

Anyway, we can easily do multiplayer with the distress signal.

If you’re creating a gaming environment now, it has emerged in the past few years due to demand.

It’s okay to have one equipped with a dual-mode system.

Unless it’s a pro who seriously only plays FPS games.

Why talk about professional gamers all of a sudden…

Isn’t 62G the biggest point of contention?

>>95

When I think about it, what kind of combination is it…?

Becoming a pro gamer in the Monster Hunter tournament is impossible, right?

I’m not interested in what kind of environment an anonymous person is in.

It’s probably being eaten up by the memory allocated to the built-in GPU…

>>99

So you haven’t disabled it… well, if you don’t disable it, you can check the status of the PC even if the graphics card breaks.

A real-life profession hunter, huh?

16×3 equals 48.

8 + 4 + 2 equals 14.

If we have 6 slots, we can do it!

Once the frame is generated, it will probably reach 120, and including the monitor, it seems to be an environment balanced at a high level…

The difference in CPU performance is more significant than I expected.