It’s like a mix between SD (super-deformed) and reality.

>>2

Recently, I’ve been adjusting the proportions to this kind of height for mobility, but honestly, I feel it’s halfway and somewhat unpleasant.

Musha and the old Ryujinmaru have made a reservation.

For playing with gacha machines as a pastime.

Just because 30ML became popular, aren’t you dreaming a little too much about rearranging everything?

I was puzzled when the Voitoy division suddenly released Gundam, but I guess I’ll just buy it for now…

>>6

1800 yen…

Dreaming too much about frame structures.

It’s expensive…

How much is this?

>>12

Retail price approximately 2000 yen.

Maybe the size of my arm is the cause of the discomfort.

The head is too small.

I thought that MaiFuri and Inja might have different frame colors.

It’s impressive that only the hands have turned to gold and silver.

It’s not a food toy, it’s a voice toy…

Just sell me the block frame.

In product photos, we don’t do it due to adult circumstances, but I think we could probably mix Gundam and Ryujinmaru.

The old man’s molding color is

White (mostly)

Blue (only the chest)

Red (only the shield)

Black (only a rifle and a backpack)

So most of it is a sticker…

If all the holes and pins of the blocks are covered with armor, then there’s no point in having block elements since you won’t be able to expand your play with the blocks…

With this price, almost everything? The stickers are quite tough.

I’m not too worried about the food toys, but if you’re recommending that children play with combinations, you need to handle the shortages more properly.

If we could simplify it like Ultraman with a solid color on the back, wouldn’t we be able to increase the painting? But then again, the level of detail between Gundam and Ultraman is just too different…

Once they become three-dimensional, warriors will want anything…

If it’s a recombination, you only need to use a common joint, so isn’t a frame element unnecessary?

I think a cross silhouette would be good…

The combination is lame.

If we’re going to do a rearrangement play, can’t we gather the lineup in close colors for the first set?

>>33

Two white and two red!

This price for something that doesn’t even move properly.

Unbearable.

Isn’t it better to do a rearrangement in an ensemble?

Well, that’s pretty bad for a wardrobe malfunction.

>>36

Because the department is different…

The seal is extremely warped at the sample stage!

It depends on the price, but 2000 yen is a bit much…

I hope Super Robot Wars OG continues.

>>41

That’s no good because fans will buy it and it will sell out unnecessarily.

The unique shape unexpectedly brings back unforgettable memories.

Gundam and Wataru plastic models are around 2000 yen, so they tend to be about that price range…

Isn’t it good with a mobility joint?

At 2000 yen, the plastic model is surprisingly cheaper.

SDCS!

MS Ensemble!

Mobility joint!

Nexedge!

Block loss!

You five…

>>46

I feel like the thread image is more similar to the DX Universe Robo.

My favorite is the Nexedge Phantom.

It’s not a Gunpla, and it’s not a product from the collectibles division, I wonder where this will be placed in the toy section.

Will it be placed together with Gundam?

When I looked it up, Wataru’s design probably looked good originally, but the price definitely feels quite aggressive…

Because there are really good plastic models available for prices lower than that, it makes it even more so.

It’s amazing that they are releasing Mobile Suit Ensemble and Gachapon for 500 yen…

>>52

As for Gashapon Warrior F, I was really crying out that it was impossible cost-wise at the end, so I think it’s truly an incredible effort from the company.

>>52

Well, suddenly it seems that new works have stopped coming out…

>>52

It seems like they are quite reckless, considering the price skyrockets when it’s a Premium Bandai exclusive.

I am grateful to be able to purchase…

Upon closer inspection, it’s a red Bandai.

It might be attractive to rearrange with other genres, but within the category of Gundam, I think the Mobility Joint is definitely the best.

I was curious, but it’s mainly about stickers…

But it’s impressive that they made it clear that it’s a seal at this stage…

>>56

It’s quite unusual for Gundam-related candy toys to only show painted samples until their release.

I thought while looking at the sample of the kids’ special effects toys.

Even though it’s done with the Sentai robots, does everyone really want to do that much recombination?

>>57

It feels like the result of a combination that came from reusing frames in the Super Sentai robots.

Rather than additional elements like those in a cross silhouette that I don’t understand what they’re corresponding to.

I think it’s better to realize from the beginning that this is a completely separate matter.

When they say that part is 1800 yen while promoting recombination, it feels like a bit much.

It’s uncertain whether this will continue from here, to begin with.

The main purpose is to reduce costs by having a common basic structure, and since it has become possible to recombine as a byproduct, should I just write something like “Recombination is also possible” for now?

The block frame doesn’t really feel like a base form or anything.

It’s lackluster to standardize robots with fundamentally different scales and structures for cost reduction purposes.

Wasn’t there something smarter with the same concept before?

The range of recombination is about the same as the gacha ones, so I don’t really understand the benefits of the frame.

With this level of recombination, it’s fine to have it in an ensemble…

It’s fine to go with a mobility joint.

>>68

Even so, that costs about 700 yen each.

Even with the added option, it’s still 1400 yen, which is double.

Is it really higher than the combined price of two boxes of G Frame armor and frame…?

It seems like there’s a cutting mistake, only the uncle and the warrior have their heads missing…

Something like… put in a Zaku or something…!

>>74

It’s kind of crazy that even if you mix two seeds and a warrior on the 1st, they won’t fully combine.

I just want the frame a little.

It doesn’t mention the size, so it doesn’t seem like the size is a selling point?

I just realized that sometimes the pin in the forearm is there and sometimes it’s not, so it can’t freely hold the shield.

Bandai tends to regularly release robot toys with this kind of physique.

The mobility joint is also in a tricky situation with seal hell.

Why are there such similar new products on the market?

It feels strange to only have the package shield and not a rifle.

In the end, I can’t move my legs because of the waist armor, so I can’t strike a proper pose.

A deformed body type with shins isn’t all that rare, you know…

It creates an uneasy balance that makes me look like I have incredibly short legs.

I thought that since Wataru is also appearing, the ability to mix it with other works would be a unique strength, but it didn’t work out because the frame structure was different.

>>84

Is it different!?

>>85

The shoulders and hips are getting longer with more blocks.

>>89

The blocks that make up the structure seem to be common.

It seems like a variety of things could be done by rearranging in block units.

Even so, at least it seems possible to recombine things like hands and feet.

I really wanted it if it didn’t have a seal.

I wonder if they included Gundam just to push Wataru’s project.

The frame is common.

It seems they are effectively utilizing it by rearranging it according to their body type.

Wataru’s robot has a unique body shape, so there’s no way that’s possible.

The idea of being able to change body shape by combining block parts is probably innovative.

It probably won’t be very useful for those who are playing.

It seems that the legs interfere with each other, and I don’t think they can be successfully rearranged beyond the work.

I thought I had seen it somewhere before; it’s that, the previous team’s second member, Roho, had their armor stripped off like this.

I wonder if Gundam is something that people really want to reassemble that much.

Wataru is cool.

The problem is that there are plastic models that can provide the same reconfiguration fun at the same price.

I can do recombination play!

I have hardly done anything personally.

>>98

I like Lancelot with the Sutherland arm from Gears, but as for decorating it with that…

I can’t believe this isn’t a food toy.

It seems to be aimed at customers who feel intimidated by plastic models.

The price being just under 2000 yen makes it a hurdle that’s not so easy to approach!

>>101

Isn’t this a bit much to give to a child?

>>106

In that case, wouldn’t it be much better to buy a BB?

>>114

They’re only selling minor ones, aren’t they?

>>128

Caliburn and Mighty are sold everywhere…

>>130

It’s just the same expensive SD as the price range thread image…

>>128

I see that there are plenty of SD figures available for sale.

It would have been awesome if it were a snack toy for 800 yen.

If only my head were a bit bigger…

Bandai really sucks at making block toys.

>>105

I was able to do it during the Mugenbine…

Recently, the ones that are just made as a frame for now and can be rearranged later are really not good.

You can create monsters that discard existing shapes by increasing joints like Zoids! However…

I think it’s pointless to turn a humanoid object into a block frame.

If anything, they also started promoting reassembly play with Gunpla since the AGE era, and the push for reassembly to make us buy more has always been one of Bandai’s ambitions, in my impression.

It’s not holding up at all due to shortages and considerations for retail.

>>109

Hasn’t recombination been quite promoted since the peak of poly caps?

Medabots?

It’s not unbearable, but… whoa, that’s a bit too expensive…

For now, there are too many people who only buy Musha and Ryujinmaru.

If it’s a food toy around 600 yen, then I can accept that…

There was something like this in Zoids.

>>115

If it’s Blox, then apart from the strength of the rubber at the joints, it was well made, right?

The real performance starts after you have enough pieces for recombination…

The head and torso are too small compared to the arms and legs, which is unsettling.

If this is the example they present saying you can enjoy combinations, it won’t sell.

>>118

Expanding the torso block to give the warrior six arms! That sounds fun if it’s possible.

From what I can see regarding the division of blocks and armor, it doesn’t seem like there’s any expandability that would allow for branching out, only an extension of the arms and legs to a certain degree.

The framed deformed robot from China that Milestone introduced domestically was well-made and I’m glad about it.

Well, the design is a bit… you know…

Even the G Frame is sold in installments for 680 yen, but is 600 yen for the thread picture really okay?

What a sumo wrestler’s body shape!

Are you planning to do a sumo match?

Justice somewhat disguises their body type and looks better.

It looks like a sticker that could easily peel off at the sample in the bottom right…

It’s not a plastic model, but a completed product, so is it like the original SD…?

The Inja shoulder seal and the warrior arm seal look like they’ll fray quickly…

If I buy four, is it 7200 yen?

Even at half price, it’s 3600 yen…

I thought it would be around 800 yen at most, but it’s 1800 yen!?

If the decent Wataru doesn’t do well with the lineup, it might get canceled.

The food toy conversion type thing ended so quickly.

I want you to understand that kids only want cool things.

Heisei feeling

The benefits are too minimal…

There are people who want to combine Wataru and Gundam, and it finally starts to make sense.

>>140

I don’t really feel like I want to combine them…

In rural areas, being able to buy on Amazon is quite a high point.

If it’s in this price range, you might as well add painted parts, right?

If you’re going to combine Wataru and Gundam, wouldn’t it be just fine with a model kit…?

Even in its original state, it’s not that great, so I won’t bother rearranging it to play around.

The common frame seems reasonable at first glance, but you have to adjust the clearance for movement just with the casing.

The silhouette makes you look bulky, and since a lot of materials are used in places you can’t see, the price can’t be kept down, so there aren’t many good points.

>>147

The design is also influenced by the frame…

In this price range, I feel like it would be more fun to add a little and assemble Gundam models instead.

At least a little more of the deformed mecha.

If there were a Gundam Tank with a detachable infinite track part, it would expand the variety of possible combinations.

>>150

The Gundam Tank Cannon + Musha seems more fun to remix.

“Since it’s a boy toy, it’s an option for kids who want riders or sentai.”

Gav is in a bubble state, so it’s even more disadvantageous.

While I’m bringing out the Dragon God, I’ll just take out the Gundam as well… isn’t this too much?

I don’t even have enough money to color the corners.

It costs 1800 yen, yet…

Is he slightly more handsome than Mobility Joint…?

Isn’t Justice too harsh?

If you’re reading it as “BLOCKCROSS,” wouldn’t it have been better to use something like BLOCXROSS? The logo design is also based on the assumption of an “X”…

>>159

The naming is anticipated until the block frame is omitted or ends with the second bullet, leading to block loss.

Super Sentai Robots were putting out similar things too, right?

I wonder if they released that as an addition because it was well received.

I’ve never really thought about wanting to play around with reassembling Gundam.

If there is a transformation in the original work, that’s one thing.

>>161

It would be difficult at this price range in today’s era, but it was a lot of fun to have all my friends gather and build Gunpla that were thrown into a toy box.

Girls were also participating.

>>161

Everyone must have some experience swapping out arms and legs with Gunpla…

If you can only do rearrangements within that range, then Gunpla is fine…

>>161

When I was in elementary and middle school, I was all over the place…

As long as the diameter of the BJ or 3mm rod matches, it can work, and I was making crazy amounts of Orirobo that aren’t even like the original Gundam Breaker.

It’s now 30mm or so, making it easy and fun to do.

There are no Strike or F90 despite wanting to rearrange things…

I feel the advancement of technology in this price range.

It’s too narrow to only have Gundam and Wataru.

Sometimes it’s impressive how someone navigates internal politics and showcases their skills through presentations.

It feels like the good parts of SD are gone in this thread image.

The idea of being able to combine SD Gundam Legends and Wataru seems fun, but there are too many hurdles to overcome beforehand.

It doesn’t necessarily have to be a common frame for part reassembly, right?

It tends to become uncommon relatively early on.

>>172

If it continues…

It looks like your shoulder won’t move at all.

Recently, LEGO blocks have been gaining momentum quietly, and I wonder if my attempt to get into building sets is influenced by that trend.

https://www.bandai.co.jp/candy/gundam/bitlot/

It seems like this is more influenced by BE@RBRICK than LEGO minifigs.

>>176

The proportion of the body, or rather the body shape, is just too creepy.

Isn’t the Wataru concept completely overlapping with the plastic model?

>>177

The business divisions are different.

>>191

It’s like with food toys and gachas, the same manufacturers are competing with each other…

Please make the lineup sufficient to create a Fire Deathscythe.

Even though the proportions are different, at this price, the G frame is good enough…

Sometimes, it’s just that what they do over there is exceptionally good.

I really like that it can be rearranged without being constrained by scales, since the axes are the same.

If there aren’t more varieties, the range of recombination is narrow.

When recombining, it’s easier with a lower body ratio.

https://www.bandai.co.jp/candy/gundam/mobilityJoint/09/

It’s a food toy, but this is a shared framework that is still ongoing.

>>184

It came out relatively early that there were some that were subtly not common.

It didn’t work.

>>185

I can feel that the hair parts are secured with hinges and it shows a lot of effort.

As can be seen in this image, despite the hairstyle compatibility, there are inconsistencies with the ear shapes, showing that the specifications are already lacking…

>>185

I heard that Char and Amuro’s helmet exchange can’t be done unless it’s forced.

That’s where we don’t match… and it becomes.

Gashapon Quest doesn’t match the size in strange places.

>>190

The differences in the specifications of the wrists and ankles of the character mentioned above are one thing, but to be honest, I think Bandai’s lack of know-how in consistently continuing a line of interchangeable toys is really evident.

>>190

If you look closely, they have actually changed the shape of Amuro and Char’s faces properly…

You don’t need that kind of obsession.

It might be since the Chogokin Mighty that I’ve only been able to find negative elements up to this point…

Even if I force out some good points, Wataru still seems pretty good, right?

I liked the mobility joint concept and bought quite a few, but I was scared to detach the joints.

Is this a pattern where the project was planned with Wataru in mind, and then it became strange with the addition of Gundam?

>>192

It seems like someone used the idea of “This is Gundam!” to push through a project with Wataru as a basis, claiming that the frame can also be used for other products.

I had something like this when I was a kid.

In any case, the proportion is uncool.

The old BB Senshi were a lot of fun because you could easily swap out their armor and helmet decorations on their arms and legs.