Attaching an M203 grenade launcher to an M4 can also be considered a type of combination.

Even if it’s a failure, if it was created with a proper purpose, there are things that can be understood…

Suddenly increased variety of the mysterious weapon frame launcher.

I like things that have a transformation mechanism depending on the purpose.

In the thumbnail, I thought my head looked like Dunbine, and I went “Is that what a composite is?!” but it was just my misunderstanding.

Toys are meant to be played with, so I want a transformation mechanism.

For beam weapons that have power but can’t change output, I’d want a sub with a short launch interval.

>>8

I really like the GN Vulcan on the GN Cannon of the Arios Gundam GNHW/M because it’s exactly that kind of feeling.

When it comes to composite armaments, it’s Trikeros.

The significant decrease in combat power during damage, and the poor maneuverability, are both aspects that I find endearing.

Well, most people think that a single-function option is better when considering the effort involved…

Beam Jutte should have been more popular.

All-in-one is for boys, right?

I think so, but I’m worried about maintainability.

I think the Kimavida’s drill lance can be swung around easily with one hand.

>>15

This area clearly benefits from the double stacking of reactors and the strength of the frame.

In terms of Gundam, there are things like the Z Gundam’s beam rifle from the older days and newer ones like the sleek GN Sword II and the Gila Gas Spear, so it’s not that unusual.

>>16

Are the missiles and depth charges from Gyan a combined weapon system?

>>41

Athena Parthenos had similar weapons too.

A weaponized being in the shape of a shield.

>>16

I understand what you’re trying to say, but those two newer ones, are they really that new?

It feels a bit too concentrated on its purpose, but I don’t really dislike G-Bird.

I like combined armaments like shield + gun (cannon) + sword, such as Fullkranz, Providence, and Tarsis.

With live ammunition, there are almost no heat issues…

I don’t know it’s a beam.

>>19

Doesn’t the beam seem to be hotter?

In reality, a heavily equipped gun is too heavy to carry as a weapon, so it’s not viable, but if it’s a robot’s weapon that can overlook that, then it might be acceptable.

I’ve become a lonely adult who can only think of drawbacks with big multi-armed weapons like in the picture.

>>21

In reality, it wasn’t user-friendly, which is why it wasn’t used in the future era (well, in the original world, it wasn’t even completed in the first place).

It’s a machine that brings out high performance with the OS of HADES-E and medication for the pilot.

I love Provi’s shield.

I like the threads in the picture; they have a great impact.

>>24

I want to live a romantic life attacking with various weapons one after another and discarding them one after another.

I wonder if this will also become a composite weapon.

>>25

I think that’s basically the source of inspiration for the composite weapons in robot-themed works.

Just the bayonet left.

I can’t explain its usefulness, but I love weapons that combine guns and swords.

I don’t really care, but isn’t there too much of a thread like “Is 〇〇 heart-fluttering?”

I like the way a huge, messy combination weapon sheds parts due to ammunition depletion and damage during battle, ultimately leaving just a simple gun.

I quite like shot lancers.

If you’re going to do it, I want a big blade attached as well.

In terms of robot types, I really like the one that integrates Harken’s machine gun, ripper, and revolving stake, which is surprisingly sleek for yesterday.

There is a romance in things that can transform into both swords and guns, like God Eater and Assault Lily.

I like the various armaments of Sinanju.

I like the gun with an ice maker from The Fifth Element.

I also like the Gatling gun from Beverly Hills Cop 3.

I like combined weaponry of real bullets and beams.

I think it would be better to consolidate it into a single, lighter, smaller tool that won’t get in the way, especially for large machinery over 10 meters.

If I show too much scarcity, I might end up prioritizing preservation in an important moment and end up losing.

It’s good if you can throw it away casually.

>>39

It’s nice to have a composite weapon system that customizes and arranges commonly used weapons.

I like using the Switch Axe in Monster Hunter, but I always think that it’s unrealistic to strike or impale a strong and hard monster with a weapon that has a transformation mechanism and houses bottles.

I did it because I can do Gundam! I haven’t thought about the consequences! It’s a world where engineers like to think “I can just attach the theory later!”

I love composite armaments that are just a collection of existing weapons.

Combining the Beecox Masher and the Muramasa Blaster makes you think, “That’s silly.”

The technology to emit beam sabers from the Z’s rifle was not passed on later.

>>49

It’s properly passed on to Rizer’s rifle.

>>49

Shotclaw

>>49

It’s not a rifle, but isn’t the ZZ’s beam cannon and beam saber similar?

I also like detachable weapons like the Charge Axe and Beam Sabers…

I think it’s foolish to have even added missile pods, Shikinah.

>>53

Genealogically, the Shekina is probably a Heavy Gundam frame launcher with a beam cannon attached to it.

>>53

I think it’s fine to have a rifle with an anime missile attached.

It’s a world where anime missiles are widespread.

I like the ones that connect the Sinanju’s rifle and bazooka.

Live ammunition takes up considerable space in the magazine, so composite armaments are quite challenging.

As long as there is a power supply there, I will attach a beam weapon that doesn’t require a magazine.

>>56

If you don’t have enough power to reduce Minovsky particles to megaparticles, then beam cannons still need ammo…

The shield’s grenade launcher and beam cannon are often picked up, but the beam rifle with a grenade launcher is rarely collected for the ν Gundam.

In actual combat, using beams, missiles, and machine guns with the same weapon and the same pose won’t stand out, right?

I dislike it because combining multiple functions to make it convenient often ends up being meaningless since I can’t fully master it.

When scaled to reality, it’s because I only use a simple one-button auto heat function and wattage + time specification without fully utilizing the multifunctional capabilities of the microwave.

>>61

It’s because lazy people can’t master it, but proactive people might be able to. However, it can be seen as a drawback that more conscious effort is required.

I’m scared that when I fire a missile, the heat from the rifle barrel below might cause a secondary explosion.

>>63

If the adjustments in this area are mishandled, it will probably end up being like Zodiac.

>>63

Isn’t it that bullets from a Gatling gun are less likely to cause secondary explosions than missiles? I wonder why missiles with special explosives are always perceived to explode due to mere heat?

Somehow, I have a vague impression that it’s like a half-hearted survival tool.

Guncluster of the Destroid from Macross.

I like things that are similar to the beam cylinder of the Leopard Destroyer.

I feel that the Heavy Machine Gun grenade of the Scopedog is somewhat lacking in presence.

Even if Tieren is manly, it’s still lonely in its own way.

The space type only has a sword rifle.

If you pack various things into a single weapon, it becomes heavy and the balance seems off.

I like this kind of Gatling gun, but it’s probably influenced by Exceed Draft.

>>72

Maybe it’s the Gigastreamer from Winspector…?

>>80

Sorry, this is definitely it…

I remember swinging toys around when I was a child.

In Gundam games, the complexity of controls and the amount of actions can sometimes be more directly related to the number of users than to their strength.

>>73

The simplicity of operating in single-task mode makes it easier to become stronger than the specified values, which means it can pollute the environment even more, making it a particularly strong machine.

The complexity arises because there are many people who cannot fully utilize the specs, so unless it’s a machine that feels strong just by being used, it’s hard to disrupt the environment.

There probably aren’t many people who can master a 10-function knife.

>>74

If you merge a fork, knife, and spoon into one, it’s obvious that you won’t be able to use both at the same time, so individual ones are better.

It looks too heavy and difficult to maneuver.

>>75

When handled by a person, complex armaments are impossible due to weight issues.

If it’s a custom MS with sufficient power and thrust, can I handle it…?

Having too many weapons seems difficult to handle, and conversely, cramming multiple functions into just one or two weapons also seems challenging to manage.

>>77

Conversely, a simple configuration like a beam rifle and beam saber seems demanding in terms of skill and could be quite challenging.

>>82

I want to have at least one surprise-kill equipment like a belly beam.

>>82

The O!

>>90

It’s a machine that requires real strength, isn’t it?!!

I thought vaguely that it would be quite troubling if the armament were to be destroyed just in case.

I love the I-field launcher of the Siskood because it’s dumb.

I don’t know the thread picture.

What kind of weapon?

>>85

Shekina is a versatile weapon designed to fight at any range.

Even if the worst happens and the Shekinah is destroyed, if it’s a Pale Rider series, I can escape with a similar arm beam gun like G04 or G05.

I like duel grenade launchers.

Even if we ignore weight and center of gravity on the assumption that it will be held by a giant robot, I’m still afraid of breakdowns or being hit.

Maybe the maintenance worker will cry too.

I like the packing performance of the shield around Char’s Counterattack.

Shekina was probably a weapon that would crush the difficulty of armed control with Hades…

In space, where propulsion is necessary for movement, equipment that doesn’t use propellant is just dead weight, consuming extra propellant.

I can’t help but think that something like the Jegan’s shield would be ideal.

Many of the machines conceived by Sir Paputemas are not designed for the general public, as per his ideology…

Since we’re integrated, it seems inconvenient to have to keep fighting with empty or broken weapons.

If you want to do various things, first, I want you to hold weapons in both hands.

On top of that, please add more.

Speaking of which, is the Geass’s Guren’s radiation wave cannon a composite weapon?

>>99

It means that the armament with a common basic principle of operation has multiple functions through adjustment switching.

It means that it is a radiative wave mechanism equipped with a claw arm that possesses physical aggressiveness.

If SEED’s Blitz loses an arm, it will end up with no decent weapons left.

The Aura Sword Rifle seems to be user-friendly.

As long as it’s not using bombs on shields or turning gun muzzles into blunt weapons, that’s fine.

Huh? The Yaktodoga’s shield has a built-in beam rifle.

When you add a missile launcher, that box is completely in the way after firing the missile, isn’t it? That’s what I think…

In the first place, if the weight of the weapon itself increases, inertia will likely interfere with aiming…

The Jegan also comes with missiles mounted on its shield by default.

The shield from the time of Char’s Counterattack is mostly a weapons platform, after all.

A type of beam rifle like Z that can emit a saber.

I’m worried that after a duel, the gun barrel might get bent and the aim will be all messed up.

You can do various things, and if you want, it can even transform like a gacha toy, but in reality, it’s usually a defective product.

I was surprised that the game console Switch works properly.

When stored in the dock, it will display on the TV, and the handle separates to become wireless… it’s definitely a boy’s toy…

The composite weaponry in the thread image is really lame…

I love the Octane Launcher.

I like composite weapons with a transformation mechanism that changes the output from a power source like GE’s Divine Weapon, even though it’s not a robot.

It’s like I bundled everything about Valvrave, and it makes me go “hmm.”

It seems like it would be really difficult to fix when it breaks, and the period of being unusable would also be long… kind of like a TV and video combo.

I quite like the full-burnian’s jutte as well.

Due to tight deadlines, we consolidated most of the functions into weapons, and the robot was specialized to handle those weapons.

The Temujin has an incredibly distorted design for a protagonist-like position.

>>114

The beam sword, which could also be called a pronoun, originally developed from realizing that the energy enveloping the beam launcher’s barrel could be repurposed for attacks.

>>118

Therefore, that beam launcher itself was developed as a long-range cannon, and Temujin was a machine designed for longer engagement distances.

Since the world of war is a spectacle, being flashy is more appealing, which is why I am in my current position.

Boys like things like this, right?

I think the connection of the bayonet-equipped beam rifle of the Verdebuster Gundam with the blade extended is the best.

>>117

A rifle bayonet with surprisingly amazing technology used in it!

I often feel more romantic about equipping based on roles rather than giving them composite weapons.

After all, it’s just something from anime or manga.

No matter how much armor you put on, you can’t win against one gigantic cannon.

This is all there is to it.

It’s more exciting to see a pilot’s skill in luring an enemy into a favorable area where their craft can absolutely win, rather than being able to fight in all situations.

I often find myself in a feeling where I like something but also don’t.

I instinctively like the blue frame tactical arms, but rationally I don’t.

I also like to set both the real entity beams together into one.

Romance is not an excuse for lacking reality.

I like the White Flame Ten Special Knife Hand.