Killing the civilians of an enemy nation makes it inconvenient because you can’t exploit them anymore.

Is it because there are already very few people in the land you acquired?

It’s strong when used by oneself, but too strong when used against someone else, so we all agreed to stop using it.
Hehe, it’s a complete massacre.

Weapons of mass destruction are not allowed.

It started as measures against trenches…
Whoa, too strong… let’s ban it because it’s dangerous.

In reality, there are no convenient places to use poison gas.

It’s just like a nucleus.
I don’t use it because I don’t want to be used.

It’s not acceptable for the goal to become to violently kill someone.

What are we fighting for? Are we doing it to kill people? That’s the kind of conversation it leads to…

To be honest, a proper military organization these days should at least be equipped to deal with NBC threats.
The use of poison gas can only be aimed at civilians, right?

You can get the city while keeping it beautiful.

It is being used in Ukraine, but.

You will be given a bad name.

It cannot be used recklessly because it involves civilians as well.
A country that cannot receive instructions from the international community will become isolated.
An isolated country becomes unmanageable.
In the end, it perishes.

From the perspective of not being counterattacked, if robots rise up in the future, they’ll definitely attack with WMDs…

Using it in the colony is too much to handle.
The air of the colony is life itself, so why can killing be done so easily?
Seema!

It can be said for all NBC weapons, but if we eliminate restrictions, it will absolutely lead to a situation where they are too easily used against each other…

It seems that this poison gas was accidentally self-detonated by the opponent while trying to use it against us.

Isn’t it the same as saying we should just launch our nukes at each other?
In other words, we don’t do it because it is costly for both parties.

If it’s about murder efficiency, then dropping bombs is probably faster than using poison gas.

How long does toxic gas remain toxic?

Seriously, it’s dried leaves~!

For a moment, I thought the gas cylinder was in a good mood.

This is the worst, Seema. Someone who does things like this is not a member of the Delaz Fleet.

China still experiences toxic gas leak accidents frequently.
https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/press/danwa/17/dga_0626.html

What kind of delusion is it to think that you can only kill people?

The core of the poor

Is it a gas that only kills humans?

N-No… I didn’t mean it like that…

Cleaning up a body that has turned into garbage is probably more troublesome than just taking over normally.

The environmental pollution is quite severe, and we can’t live properly.

Don’t nomads desire land more than people?

Since they said they would do a massacre, we can’t forgive Zeon.

The Zeon bastards are using the land without mercy because they intend to turn it into Earth destruction weapons.

When all living things die, that land will become unsustainable.

But weapons that are like bugs aren’t elegant, you know.

Shall we do it?
Neutron bomb…!

In reality, Russia and Israel are massacring civilians and no one is stopping them, so isn’t it just a free-for-all?

Actually, when used on the battlefield, the wind changed and it flowed back to our troops.

Is this the Seema squad?
You seem to be in quite a good mood.

It’s sad to kill people! But those Viet Cong hiding in the forest are annoying!
So I’ll spray herbicide…

A neutron bomb, which is an existing dangerous weapon that is difficult to use simply because its storage costs are high.

If you’re going to release poisonous gas into a building, placing a bomb would be more reliable.

Even if it’s prohibited, rogue states use it normally.

Infrastructure development really requires an outrageous amount of money and time…

War has rules, which is why it is war.
It’s like the Olympics.
But if you ignore that, it’s just murder.
I mean, this Olympics is seriously causing too many people to die…

Humans are not created with a spirit that enjoys killing other humans.

Actually, the bodies of living things are really dirty.

Is your head a parrot?

If it works on humans, wouldn’t it also have an effect on other animals?

If you crush all the other countries, you’ll be safe.

Poison gas is like a special attack in a confined space like a colony.
Not only did this type of colony first appear in anime,
Isn’t it amazing that they actually injected poison gas and brought it down to Earth?

If I were a rebellious robot, I wouldn’t let the timing of the rebellion be discovered by damn humanity when it’s in check.
If it’s gas, I want to cover the entire Earth for a while from the start.

That’s an incredibly clear mark…

Actually, humans are strong against toxins compared to other animals.

If it’s a country that can confidently say it isn’t afraid of economic sanctions and that it will actually retaliate against military invasions by becoming the enemy of the world, then it might be okay to use it.
If such a country exists, though.

Even without poisonous gas, if you spread extremely smelly farts, humans will disappear.

Is poisonous gas really convenient in the first place?
Unless the purpose is outright slaughter like in the thread image…

If everything goes, then even important people have to constantly live in fear of assassination, right?

If you’re only using it to drop colonies, you don’t have to worry about handling the corpses.

There is a super convenient thing called a neutron bomb that can kill only living beings.

I wonder if there are toxic gases that only affect primates.

I want to make the other party accept my demands, and I don’t want to engage in an extinction war!

Sarinin didn’t kill that many people, and in reality, its effects might not be as significant as the general public thinks.

Are there actually any examples where public opinion changed due to a top assassination?

Humans can’t even control their own farts, so how could they possibly use poison gas? Idiot.

Landmines are also strong in that they do not cause environmental pollution.

The reality is that I don’t want to use it simply because management is difficult.

I thought the angle of the image was a bit erotic.

Even if you can defend by setting up mines or traps, the value of the territory becomes worthless.

The control is tedious, and it kills off talented people who could become resources, so it can’t be used for anything other than ethnic cleansing.

Wouldn’t it be effective to use nuclear weapons on landmines?

There is also the advantage of being able to secure the building unharmed, or so they say… well… maybe it is…?

Will the use of nuclear weapons in war be able to remain as the last, as in Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

Contaminated land can’t be inhabited for many years.

Whether or not toxins remain when chemical weapons are used depends on the purpose for which they were developed, doesn’t it?
In the past, maybe, but now…

Compared to poison gas, landmines are seriously more powerful…

I think it’s likely that somewhere will use nuclear weapons soon, as nuclear-armed countries are engaging in wars more vigorously.

Didn’t Syria or the former dictatorial regime use poison gas against their own citizens?

In an outdoor space, it tends to spread, rather than in a confined space…
Even if we want to kill the one barricaded indoors, they can be somewhat protected by the air conditioning, and if it can be sealed off, it’s faster to drop a bomb or completely seal it off.

I thought we went to war because we wanted people and land…

Isn’t there a peaceful weapon that only kills humans, does not cause environmental pollution, and does not damage buildings?

In the biological world, using poison is a legitimate strategy, so I don’t understand why poison users are treated as cowardly.
There are tactics like smearing with filth to aim for tetanus, and whether killing with a sword, a gun, or gas, it’s all essentially the same…
I wonder if humans instinctively dislike poison.

Let’s use environmentally-conscious hydrogen bombs.
Weapons are also part of the SDGs era.

Isn’t it impressive that despite all this conflict, nuclear weapons haven’t been brought up?

It is desirable to have weapons that not only kill but also eliminate corpses without a trace because corpses can be a source of contamination.

If we could create something like a brainwashing ray that would allow us to control others without killing them, we might be able to wage war peacefully.

If they have the scientific capability to actually create a colony, they shouldn’t be able to breach an air purification system this easily.

If a nuclear war were to happen, Russia could be wiped out with the population concentrated in Moscow and Saint Petersburg.
Just that alone could end the country, so Russia would probably least want to use nuclear weapons.

I’ve heard that perfect sarin is odorless.

I think that if any country were to use nuclear weapons, they would ultimately be forgiven casually.

Even though it’s a regular match, drones are flying in from trucks around and blowing up air force bases, which is amazing.

If we can erase the enemy nation from the map before being counterattacked, everything will be fine!

In a space like a colony, it’s not normal to kill millions of people just with poison gas.

It’s scary that nuclear-armed countries India and Pakistan are at odds with each other…

Why did the Aum do something like that and carry out a terrorist attack on civilians?
The incident itself hasn’t faded, but it seems that there are more people who don’t remember the background well.

During the Iran-Iraq War, chemical weapons from both Eastern and Western countries were used, and it’s just shocking.
Moreover, both use child soldiers, which is heartbreaking…

It’s enough that German soldiers were so shocked by chemical weapons in WW1 that they surrendered to warn the Allies.

It’s often invalidated quite quickly, and it doesn’t die as much as I expected…

During the sarin incident, there were several people who had just taken a gas poisoning course and remembered what symptoms to expect, which allowed for a quick response. There were also hospitals that maintain facilities for major disasters that are usually not very useful, and there were companies that continue to produce especially unsalable antidotes as part of their obligation to the pesticide industry. Multiple strokes of luck came together.

In the Armenia-Azerbaijan Nagorno-Karabakh war, drones were flying all over the place, right?

If you get land, you’ll be happy, but wanting passive income means that just receiving unused land won’t be of any use to you.

I’m seriously living with my breath held like on Jupiter…

During World War I, a substantial portion, about 20-30%, of the French territory was heavily utilized and exploited on the main front.
Even now, over 100 years later, there is a bitter experience from the red zone that cannot be used, and since then it has been completely banned in subsequent wars.
Even Hitler from Nazi Germany adhered to this because he had experienced toxic gas during the world war.

Isn’t it better to take air superiority and drop poison gas on the capital like the Tokyo air raids?

Isn’t there fundamentally no chemical weapon that only kills humans and leaves no toxicity behind?

If you’re going to drop a colony, wouldn’t it be better to just drop it as is without bothering to kill the people inside?
Is killing an act of mercy?

War is the final stage of diplomacy.
Using poison gas to slaughter civilians is not even war anymore.

Gas is not used because it is difficult to control and because if used recklessly, it could be retaliated against since it is readily available.
It’s something like nuclear mutual authentication.
Diffusion relies on wind direction, so it’s difficult to narrow down the effective range, making it usable only for indiscriminate murder or attacks, thus its value as a weapon is not very high.
Since Germany first used it in World War I, that perception has remained the same.

When the war started, people said it would be over in a month! Or that they would be back by Christmas, and yet how long has it been going on…

I thought there would be poison gas drones, but it’s just self-destruction all the time.

The introduction of poison gas, tanks, and machine guns in World War I caused a rapid increase in the number of casualties.

When I think that one day the land might be usable, it feels like a dream!
It’s a time capsule left by past mistakes!

Usually, it is not about hating the other ethnicity, but rather the use of force in war arises when there is no resolution through dialogue between nations, and there is no reason to indiscriminately kill civilians with gas.

Akio, Akio, that’s not the sound of a cough, it might be a child’s name.

Some people were saying that it would be like the Vietnam War.

We must not forget that this world is one that has experienced the Sarin gas attack.
It’s hard to imagine that a single thin hole in a pin can render protective clothing worthless, but before the sarin incident, it might have been difficult to grasp that concept.