
Meitamon Voice / Yukiko Morishita. A partner Digimon of Megumi. It imitates Megumi’s speech, speaking in a dialect-like manner. Under normal circumstances, it is a reliable Pokémon that has a deep affection for Megumi, but inside it contains fragments of the data of Apocalymon, which Taichi and the others once fought against, and when it undergoes a transformation, it possesses the power to destroy the world.
I think it’s one of the worst typos in Digimon.
Thumbnail Pokémon
This is the second case following Kunemon…
Because it’s Pokémon, I was mercilessly killed at the end by tri.
I knew you were conscious of it.
>>5Well, the start of Digimon is undoubtedly a copy of Pokémon…
>>6Isn’t it definitely a Tamagotchi…?
>>52Tamagotchis are more like older brothers, don’t you think?
>>5It’s impossible to know Digimon and not know Pokémon.
Conversely, however
I had the impression that there were quite a few of these typos, but until then, it was only that one example of Kunemon.
>>7In the official scope, probably.
This guy should stick to Pokémon.
It’s a bit sad that there’s no reverse on the Pokémon side.
>>11Digimon have been conscious of Pokémon since their birth, but there’s no need for Pokémon to be conscious of Digimon…
I didn’t know, so it was no good after seeing the image.
Typos are a common thing in Digimon, but since tri received such a terrible reputation, this typo was criticized even more harshly.
It’s strange that typographical errors are bound to happen, but well, yes.
>>13The reason why “All Delete” gets misspelled so much is that the original materials are misspelled, so it didn’t work out.
Digimon too
Pokémon too
Together.
I think after typing “Digital Pokemon,” I deleted the letters in the middle and wrote “Digimon.”
I remembered that I matched with a trainer named Digimon in Pokémon ranked matches.
I read it casually, but I see, it’s something different…
What kind of magazine is this? If it’s a movie pamphlet, then it’s done.
>>19This is a mook book.
>>19Since it’s a mukku book released by the official source, it’s quite outdated.
I’m so sorry!
>>22………
During this time, many Digimon fans weren’t angry but rather heartbroken, so it’s okay!
I couldn’t understand what it was at first glance.
I thought it was a spoiler because it was in the past tense.
I wonder why there are so many typos in books related to Digimon.
>>27There are many confusing or easily mistaken skill names, and the creators lack motivation.
>>27I wonder if it’s because the officials didn’t properly compile the materials first.
>>27Typos exist in any work, but…
I think the impression comes from the fact that there are troublesome fans who compile every typo in Digimon.
>>33Typos are common everywhere, but there are particularly many from the official side in Digimon.
Digimon and Pokémon are not on that level, right!?
>>30It’s so rare that there are only two examples!
First of all, I think it’s not good that due to the mistake, we can no longer tell what is correct regarding the digital letters on Omnimon’s sword, which is, in a way, the most important point.
>>32The reference materials for the artwork were incorrect, weren’t they?
>>35It’s funny that the revised Omegamon in the external collaboration illustration was called a fake.
It’s artistically significant that this blunder is made with a character that was rejected in the movie of all things.
If it’s a Pokémon, then it can only be sealed in a Poké Ball.
Makeomon and Kunemon are Pokémon, after all.
I remember thinking it was strange when I made an excuse to correct the mistake between Shenwumon and Suzeemon, even from an elementary school perspective.
>>40After all, their names are Genbu Mon and Suzaku Mon…
It would be better to honestly say “I’m sorry for the typo,” but for some reason, they’re adding a setting to the Digizoid…
>>41I apologized and corrected the typographical error in the thread image!
There were other Pokémon besides Terriermon, huh?
This guy had the data for Apocalymon, huh?
I should have seen the entire chapter in the theater, but I don’t remember it.
>>43Because the content was shocking.
It’s safer since it’s not a Tamagotchi.
>>46Isn’t that actually safer…? There are also those who have mixed in from Tamagotchi and are pretending to be Digimon.
>>47What are you…?
As for the gray sword, it’s not good that there’s a typographical error, but it’s still acceptable.
I won’t forgive any missing characters.
If it’s tri, then this is about it, right?
>>50What you say is true, but the very first adventure was never something to be praised, especially not regarding typos.
>>53It’s unbelievable that adult-oriented anime from the 2010s is worse than kids’ anime from the ’90s.
>>57For adults…?
>>62The tri itself is geared towards adults, or rather, it is likely aimed at former adventure fanatics.
>>50It’s a waste of time to engage with this because it’s just a troll wanting to say this.
>>66The tri itself is the source of trolling, harassment, and chaos, right?
>>66Please stop the contrarian trolling.
Tamagotchis are kind of like siblings… but Pokémon are strangers…
It’s fun to have Tamagotchis battle each other!
Like Pokémon!
I don’t think there wasn’t such a thing.
In the first place, among the Pokémon that emerged like bamboo shoots after the rain, Digimon has secured a unique position and is considered top-tier.
That being said, it is just a second version of Pokémon.
>>56The second generation of Pokémon mostly sold on Game Boy and completely followed the marketing strategy of Pokémon.
Digimon started as a unique path derived from Tamagotchi, which is significant.
There were a ton of Tamagotchi derivatives, but since they’ve survived, it’s a double win.
It’s an indication of the intention to evolve from Pokémon to Digimon.
The game system is like Tamagotchi, but it’s clear that the concept of things like names and monster collection is derived from Pokémon!
It’s a bit close that Scopionmon was misspelled as Scorpiomon.
>>68Scorpiamon has a better ring to it…
I wonder why I didn’t become Scorpiomon.
The creation of Digimon was due to the need for a use for the large number of LCDs ordered during the Tamagotchi boom, right?
>>69The conversation is mixed up.
Are you talking about the reboot?
I’m currently playing Nekodama, and it’s really tough that this guy shows up.
It’s understandable that Pokémon makes quite a few typos as well.
Well, it’s just strange to accept typos as they are.
The character in the thread has been treated terribly, having their whereabouts and name stolen even when they made a guest appearance in the ghost game.
Even if it’s said that Digimon is influenced by the real internet world, the excuse for the typographical errors of Shen’uumon and Suitsuumon is just too weak.
>>78Since those two ended up appearing in D-3 with the wrong names, I had to come up with some excuse somehow.
>>81Terrible
>>78I thought it was too unrealistic to be in a strategy guide back then.
Because they have a good appearance and voice…
Couldn’t it really have been handled somehow…
I was wondering where the typos were, and then I realized it was a pure-hearted Pokémon.
It’s a cursed child from the point of view of the handling or the quality of the story itself, isn’t it?
I only watched anime, so I just learned about the typo for Shen Wuchuan and Suze Mon for the first time.
Where is the typographical error in the thread image…?
>>85Pokémon
>>85Regular mind is a pure Pokémon that yearns for the budding heart.
I love all dairy products.
In the first place, Omegamon was misspelled from the time of our war game.
That setting design has been continuously used with additions, and it has forever been misspelled…
The tail (not a tail) derived from Apocalymon is cute, isn’t it?
In the first place, it’s a problem that they’ve made mistakes in Pokémon twice…
I like “Courage 100%” more than “All Delirioso” if it’s a typo for Omnimon.
Well, it’s the kind of place where you might mix up the divine beasts of the East and West…