There are Gundam games before this.

It’s not a bad game.

With the Famicom! The Famicom version!

It’s the kind of thing where people call it a bad game just because they couldn’t clear it, right?

You haven’t played, have you?

It’s super difficult and I can’t see what the enemies are at all during the shooting part, but it’s pretty fun.

Because of this guy’s video, I ended up quoting lines from Basque at work.

If it’s about some video, I used to have fun playing it back then, but now if I do it, there are some things that bother me.

Which liar should I put a del tag on?

When it comes to Zeta games, it’s like the SRPG that was released on the SNES.
I borrowed it from a friend and found it quite interesting, but I’ve never seen it talked about at all.

Even in the Karasuma video, they are saying there are mixed opinions from the beginning…

This was already established as a terrible game in the early 2000s.

I always thought Scramble Wars was the first one.

Most character games are terrible, so having a first game that is a terrible game is not unusual at all.

It’s Endo from Xevious.

It’s the origin of the name Hossuku.

The only point where “Love is Sent to the Water Planet” surpasses the later Gundam games is in its music.

Until Gihren’s Greed, Gundam games were almost a barren wasteland.

Well… as a character game from that time, this one is actually not too bad.

I feel like I saw a game a long time ago on PC where you would shoot when the Zeon MS crawled in from the right and reached the center of the screen…

Most character games from the FC era can be considered trash.

Isn’t the one where the steel frame falls from above the MSX the first one?

This is pretty terrible.
If it’s just a level of emotion that changes with movement, that’s one thing.

The Knight Gundam Story is well-designed and easy to play as an RPG from that era, which is impressive…

It’s my first Famicom game…
Well, it’s fine to be crap.

I personally think that simulations like SD Gundam are quite enjoyable.

Laugh at the way the pillar collapses.

If a difficult game is presented and you can’t clear it…
Endo Masanobu said that when people say it’s boring.

Character games tend to be high difficulty, but I don’t think they are unreasonable bad games.

Gundam games really became serious after 3DCG became widespread.

There are also Gundam W games in fighting games, you know.

I found out a long time later that there is a different version of this.

I didn’t feel any sense of speed, but I somehow liked V Gundam.

I bought this along with Macross, but I remember this one being more interesting.

If you consider this to be a bad game, then most retro games will be bad games too.

If anything, I can become the current Mario and mess up the aerial performance of Mario Brothers.

Well, it might be a bit rough to lump everything together as “crap,” so it would be better to point out the specific bad aspects in more detail.

I feel like it’s not a high-difficulty unreasonable game since I was able to progress reasonably well even at that time when I was just a clueless brat.

Konami’s arcade machine shot down by Dom.
The lack of enthusiasm in Gundam’s synthesized voice is a must-listen.

If you play the Final Edition, you’ll truly understand what you wanted to do.

I think it’s fairly easy to categorize it as a crappy game.
Whether it’s interesting or not is a separate matter.

I’m starting to think that games like Nobunaga’s Ambition and Romance of the Three Kingdoms are character-driven games.

There is actually a level to the crap, you know.
It is not just 0 or 1.

I don’t know about the thread image, but most of the Famicom games were impossible for elementary school students to clear.

The only fun FC character game that comes to mind is something like Famicom Jump 2…

I had the Gundam from Game & Watch.

It feels like people are just calling anything that is difficult to understand in terms of gameplay or has poor controls “garbage.”
Well, it’s only natural that standards change with the times…

Video games!?

It may be treated as a bad game, but it’s actually well-made as an Obake Q-taro character game.
That said, it becomes a matter of difficulty!

Why are Gundam games often treated poorly despite having many good ones?

When the topic of bad games comes up, there are defenses like “Most works from that time were at this level.”
If there were properly interesting works even in small numbers, wouldn’t it just mean that “most of the works at the time were bad games”?

Mario 1 isn’t really that great anyway.
If you want, you can just use a warp.
I can understand if it’s 2, but…

Mario was able to clear it somehow, right?
Later, things like warp and infinite 1UP also appeared.
I felt a sense of accomplishment when I collected all 8 stars in Mario 2.

At that time, it was relatively better, but based on today’s evaluation standards, I think it’s fine to say it’s crap…
But I want you to remember that it’s precisely because of things like this that the current industry exists.

Space Harrier is a masterpiece!

Why were all the Gundam games on the Saturn so packed with dedication?

It felt a bit more agile than the Famicom version of Tegza.

Let’s play Zionic Front over there!

When I look at it now, it’s rather normal to say it’s crap.
Compared to now, even masterpieces might seem questionable when the explanations are helpful, the graphics are easy to see, and the operations are simple.

Since it’s an FC, it seems likely that what I want to do and the actual implementation will be quite different.

When it comes to Gundam’s terrible games or failed hardware, it’s Bandai’s RX-78 GUNDAM.

「ガンダム」の名を冠したパーソナルコンピュータ「RX-78 GUNDAM」

想い出に残る、懐かしのマイコン・パソコンを写真とともに振り返る本コーナー。今回は、バンダイエレクトロニクスが「ガンダム」の名前を冠して発売したパソコン「RX-78 GUNDAM」を取り上げました…

AKIBA PC Hotline!

Why, little boy…

Sky Destroyer is interesting, isn’t it?

It’s not that there are as many bad games as people say.
There are many works that are difficult to approach or you wonder what they are.

Lacroan Heroes, released in 1990, is incredibly forward-thinking for including double-speed movement.

Don’t call it a crappy game when it’s an old man’s memory.
We were the generation that even enjoyed playing with Takeshi’s challenge letter, you know?

Looking back now, it was an era of dawn, so I guess it’s just like this.
At that time, kids would spend their meager allowance to get stuck with that kind of game.

In the first place, children have no choice but to play the games they have bought thoroughly.

I think Final Cut is a bit too stoic, but I’m impressed it was made so well during this time.

If Takeshi’s Challenge is called a bad game, it carries a slightly different nuance.
That area is basically a joke, isn’t it?

The SFC’s F91 leaves a deep impression.

Gashapon Warriors is often talked about for Capsule Senki, but I also liked 3 and 4 because they had many units of warriors and knights.

I am reminded that even the Ultraman of the disk system can deteriorate this much in Generic Super Mario.

The software for the Famicom varies so much between the early and late periods that it feels like different hardware.
The speed of progress was so fast that both the appearance and the feel of operation were completely different.

I can’t really think of any consumer Gundam games that are at a level of being unplayable.
There may be many negative factors that are missing one aspect.

I’ll start the work now.

There are many masterpieces that remain in gaming history, but when viewed through today’s values, they can only be called terrible games.
The Tower of Druaga has no hints at all, you know?
Evaluating without considering the times is meaningless.

Well, to be honest, children back then…
It’s an amazing time when you can have fun just by being able to chat with faraway friends using a toy that looks like a walkie-talkie!

Gachapon Warrior 4 has really great background music.
I want it to be reused in various Gundam games.

Ah, I just remembered quite a bit about the fuckin’ character game Kamen Rider BLACK.

The shooting angle from the initial wave rider state is really cool.
Once I learned to adapt to the side perspective, it was actually pretty fun, so it didn’t turn out to be a bad game.
Rather, it’s one of my favorite categories among Gundam games, including the music.

Most Gundam games before Federation vs. Zeon are just trash.

When I went back to my parents’ house the other day, I played “Space Encounter” on the PS2, which I used to be really into and thought was a masterpiece, but now it feels sluggish and the loading times are tedious. So I guess games are generally more fun when they’re newer.

Battle Master is a masterpiece.

The idea that “no hints equals a bad game” is something I personally cannot agree with…

In the first place, Gachapon Senki was fun, and the developments during this period are mainly SD.
There were things like fake Virtua-On, PSZ, Char’s Counterattack, Gihren’s Greed, and original setting Gundam fighting games, right?

I think the pioneering spirit behind trying to create a pseudo-3D shooting game on the Famicom was amazing.

The story that the technology was like this at the time is not a defense, is it?
Is it advocacy?

It’s hard to tell whether there are many or few Gundam games from before the series’ evolution.
SD Gundam simulation game and Knight Gundam RPG and…
I have a memory that Banpresto was also making something half-hearted.

In SD, the arcade’s side-scrolling ones are difficult.

I feel like there were many seriously useless Gundam games, so it’s hard to say anything specific.

I understand that you want to get angry when a game you have fond memories of is treated like garbage.

At that time, game strategy involved exchanging information with friends and gathering information from magazines and strategy guides.
There was a way to enjoy it in connection with reality, so it cannot be evaluated with the current sense.

I hate it when people call games before the Famicom crap.
It was just a lack of skill, right?

Most games back then would be over in an hour, except for level grinding and unreasonable puzzles.

I think 60% is enough.

I feel like there were quite a few things that were either boring or interesting, but they just lacked volume.

I found things like Gundam: Mobile Suit Victory Gundam and SD Gundam to be interesting.

Looking back now, there are games that I can’t believe I was able to clear at that time, so you can’t underestimate kids.
Gegege no Kitaro 2 and so on.

Even if I think it’s crap after playing, I feel differently about wanting to share that.

Not to mention kids, there’s no way they’re making even adults clear this—if you’re talking about it with the current standards, it feels like crap.
Most games at that time were like that.
Even with Nintendo games in the world.

When it comes to the spirit of challenge, I think that many of the games currently being called “bad games” are products of companies that lack the necessary know-how and are struggling to produce them.
It’s like saying that the evaluation criteria are lenient because it’s from the past.

I quite liked the hot scramble BGM…

There was a time when just having the pictures move was enjoyable, but looking back now, there were definitely many instances where we could have tried harder as games.

Because of the recognition of Gundam,
Comparisons can make something a good work or a masterpiece.

In GeGeGe no Kitaro 2, the only thing to praise is Kitaro’s walking graphics.
It’s crazy that there’s no hints and the original knowledge doesn’t apply, and there’s almost no narrative or story!

If it’s about the thread image, it’s a game that’s unrelated to issues like poor response when pressing buttons or choppy movements.
In terms of graphics and background music, it’s doing quite well at the time of release, but it’s handled in a somewhat exquisitely delicate manner.

Both Saint Seiya games are relatively easy to clear.

I thought, “Are there really such terrible games now?” but…
In today’s world where indie stuff is rampant, the proportion of crap might be high…

In an era when the internet wasn’t readily available, there was only the network of friends to rely on for guidance on how to play or strategies, even if you didn’t know how.
It seems that the evaluation may fluctuate based on the surrounding level.

If it’s a game where brute force can work, then it should be manageable.

I feel there is no room for argument if Formula Chronicle 0122 is also called a bad game.

The expected version was playable in reality, and even if the content seems tough, calling it a bad game would be a lie; it’s a confusing game.
It’s okay to say that the battleship in the second half is shooting wildly and going down immediately is crap!

I think it’s already a bit of a crappy game when it comes down to “if we just match up all the time, it’ll somehow work out.”

In the early Heisei era, adventure games were primarily based on a round-robin style.
If you don’t go through all the options, new choices won’t appear.

It’s a process of elimination based on some logical reasoning, so it’s a brute force approach among the narrowed-down options.

I only have memories of playing an RPG called Kitaro 2 using a glitch to get past the barriers.