I don’t think it’s good.

I think it’s a redirection of the actual issue.

In the past, shows like Asanama would have heated debates, but they were frustrating because the host would guide the conversation to align with their own opinions and interrupt comments from people in unintended positions.

It was even better than Takeshi’s TV Tackler.

Even if there is a program having a serious discussion, anonymous people won’t watch it.

Back when I was a super doctor, my IQ was low…

K2 has been relatively enhanced by human reason…

I wonder if real experts have time to appear on TV.

I thought about it, but if the important people from each position are all gathered here, then it’s probably the quickest to clash opinions here.

>>19

I want to believe that NHK’s Sunday Debate really has experts present.

I don’t know if it’s because you’re free or not.

>>26

Isn’t the current minister visiting sometimes?

The K generation worked really hard, so the K2 world has a high level of civilization.

The opinion of the hunting cap is a result of hindsight, isn’t it?

There was a possibility that if I wasn’t careful, instead of saving one person, both could end up collapsing.

>>23

In reality, after this, there will be people who attempt the same thing without a super doctor and end up failing.

The mastermind’s intention was to steer things toward organ transplantation from clones…

>>23

Whether to regard the result of this incident as just a one-time occurrence or to use it as material for future legal development.

There is meaning in bringing it up as a topic.

It’s increasing, but sometimes serious terrorism happens.

Everyone has a high level of civility, so if we seriously debate each person’s claims, it would become uncontrollable…

Are they only thinking about the future of medicine…?

You can’t really invite qualified experts to a wide show, can you?

Somehow, the quality of the thread’s community seems to have improved.

I can’t figure out how to proceed if I can’t agree with everyone’s opinions.

The issue of not having enough organs and the question of whether it was right to bypass the rules on-site are separate matters, and connecting that to organ trafficking in other countries seems like a significant leap, doesn’t it?

>>37

I think the concern is that it won’t be a matter of other countries for much longer.

More.

Clash more between idealism and realism…

If things go well, the problem of organ shortage may be somewhat alleviated, but before that, the technology will be greatly required, so the risks outweigh the benefits.

In reality, there are people who say vague things like “abroad, it’s like this or that,” and somehow, those who want to respond just start throwing in their two cents, and the comedian just glosses over it and that’s the end.

I’ve never seen organ lotteries come up in a discussion about organ transplants, not just as a metaphor.

It’s too constructive… let’s make it more biased and lead to a unified opinion!

The issue is how many lives could have been saved with the organs from the 500,000 people who were senselessly slaughtered!

NHK’s Sunday Debate is generally like this.

Well, the ratings just aren’t coming in at all…

>>46

The opposition wants them to step down and let experts take the stage.

>>51

This is why discussion programs are declining.

>>56

Well, if you put out opposition party members who can’t see reality at all and can only bite, it makes you wonder what you want to achieve.

Do that in the National Diet.

>>61

It’s the real thing.

It seems to misunderstand supporting a behind-the-scenes money cult anti-social group as realism.

>>61

It’s not about everyone giving the answer you wish for.

It is the role of the people in that position to properly show a variety of perspectives.

>>61

The current ruling party’s policy is the best balance, and if it sways even a little to the right or left, it just shows that they don’t see reality.

>>51

If you go that far, even the current minister will bring in backroom expert advisors, leading to heated debates…

>>51

Look, there’s one like this.

Being on TV doesn’t necessarily mean you have free time, does it?

It’s very important for various people to understand the site, and it is precisely because influential people express their opinions that it carries weight.

I think this is what a wide show is like when things are going well.

However, this kind of thing is just not visible on the internet.

There are many irreparable mistakes in medicine, so there are complicated rules and systems in place to protect both the medical side and the patient side.

Endorsing on-site stand-alone actions based on results will leave lingering repercussions in the future.

If each person lived a lifestyle that values their own organs more…!

There are fields where, even if they are called experts, there are no experts who can explain things in a way that is understandable to the general public.

It seems like syndicates in Russia are probably extracting the organs of those who died in the war.

Regardless of the wide show, it seems that the influence of television cannot be ignored, so politicians appear on news programs from time to time.

Now, let’s hear what the liver has to say.

>>59

………。

I wouldn’t say that the wide shows are proper, but…

When something becomes a topic of conversation online, it’s especially extreme when it’s filled with commentators’ opinions.

Wow, they’re really calling panelists who seem to represent various fields!

(This person definitely has never watched Sunday Discussion…)

“Only recognizing what they want to see and hear is a modern-type complainer.”

I think there are serious discussions about individual topics on television as well.

I thought that just wandering around in front of the panelists on the committee was unnecessary.

I really understood how amazing Takajin was at being able to wrap up any topic after he was gone.

In fact, even in this thread image, they are troubled and being vague.

It’s been more than 10 years ago…

Experts are gathering and discussing to make decisions where they can’t be seen properly.

Television is just entertainment.

>>71

Experts alone can’t sway public opinion, so expressing opinions in visible places is also part of the job.

I want them to stop inviting people who interrupt and start talking during discussions on debate programs.

We can’t even have a discussion!

I only learned that buying rankings for children’s organ transplants is fundamentally a bad thing after I became an adult.

If you want to seek only a single perspective, I don’t think you should watch programs where the commentators are lined up next to each other.