266 people are cheering.

There are more people supporting the anonymous than I thought.

It seems to be a matter of mixed opinions.

>>8

I’ll do my best for the 6% of people who are supporting me!

You probably think that, don’t you?

>>29

I wish there had been even a little desire to respond to people’s feelings like that.

I think it would be about 1% if you conducted a survey from somewhere that isn’t the person’s account.

What were you expecting by doing this?

I might take it as there are people who support me!

I think it’s probably something like supporting until you get thrown into prison.

I don’t know what stance I should take to support this guy, even if I want to cheer him on.

The one with 6% should also go to prison.

As a doctor, they may be worthless, but there might be some aspects to support in terms of infringement of rights when they are arbitrarily made the main character of a fictional work.

>>19

I don’t really know where the line is for what counts as legitimate social sanctions.

Staying calm and observing, huh?

>>20

I don’t think the meaning of “you must take it seriously” necessarily means you have to reflect on what you’ve done.

I think they must be feeling that because my lobbying efforts are not going well, everyone doesn’t understand that I’m the one at fault, so I need to take it seriously!

I wonder what exactly we are supporting.

Let’s just mess up our brains without worrying about what’s around us! Is it that kind of feeling, or do I just want to say “do your best ❤ do your best ❤” without any particular reason?

>>22

I definitely had some bad points too, but that’s only a small part; the victims are far worse off.

That’s the tone of the argument.

It’s packed with the bad aspects of the internet.

I think the ability to adapt is incredibly high.

The type that dies if they admit a mistake.

I think about 80% of the support means “Don’t waver, don’t betray our expectations.”

Get stung.

“94% are misunderstanding… I need to work harder!”

Still misinterpreted by 94% of people!

We must take it seriously!

I don’t want to say that I’m cheering a little, even as a joke or sarcasm… It’s better not to say it.

Normal people don’t chase after this guy’s account.

Well, even if I throw some logic at this guy, nothing’s gonna change anyway.

Isn’t it more likely that pretending to support them will lead to them getting carried away and digging their own grave?

>>38

If I let this guy dig, it will cause trouble for others, so it’s no good.

Whether it’s a fake account or not, this guy’s unusually aggressive support account…

Even if your words are dirty, saying “what I’m saying is reasonable” at that point makes you one of the same kind.

One self-proclaimed lawyer was toyed with by a real lawyer and disappeared.

Takeda’s personal account is completely filled with supporters of conspiracy theories and anti-vaccine groups.

I think it’s remarkable how someone can be so shameless as to act nonchalantly even after getting caught twice defending themselves on a hidden account.

>>43

Is this for real?

There were even 6%, and I was like, wow…

>>44

When there are 100 people, well… there are probably that many contrarians, anti-vaxxers, or conspiracy theorists.

>>54

When considering it to be about 5% (a little over), it’s a relatively convincing figure.

There’s an outrageous audacity in continuing to act nonchalantly despite causing deaths due to almost botched surgeries…

Aren’t you reflecting on this?

>>46

If someone could do that, they might probably end up taking their own life out of guilt…

I think I probably forgot that I was indicted while working from home.

>>47

In order to make it possible for them to do a lot of things that don’t seem to involve reflection, it was necessary to leave them unfettered rather than in detention, wasn’t it?

I think there are people who supported with the feeling of wanting to lift them up and let them get carried away.

I would rather you realize that you did something worse and apologize to the victim.

I said I would cheer in a contrarian way, but I don’t want to see any more victims increase just in case…

It’s good if you’re aware of being contrary, but there are quite a few people who think they’re neutral when they’re just acting in opposition.

>>51

It’s quite different because it’s supported by the type of person who goes around giving ⭐️1 ratings all over the hospital’s Google Maps.

There is a difference between thinking of it as a toy of the internet and thinking that it could happen to you tomorrow…

>>55

It’s amazing to turn a comic drawing into an icon.

It’s scary not to understand actions, whether one is aware of it or not, but that’s everything, isn’t it? Isn’t it amazing?

“I’m not trying to prove my innocence! I just want to say that I’m the model for that manga, but isn’t this just me seeking validation?”

You were still resisting…

Isn’t it a monster that’s too drunk on itself…?

I don’t want to support something like this, even if it’s contrarian. I wonder if they’re serious.

Thinking about the victims and their families who might be on the verge of breaking down because of this behavior.

I’m claiming to be a walking reputation damage or something incomprehensible.

There are victims who can’t walk.

Even if it’s called walking defamation, I can only think of a certain lawyer.

What can I do from here to atone?

>>67

The minimum requirement is the revocation of the medical license.

>>67

I have committed sins that cannot be atoned for.

What was the intention behind conducting this survey?

There might be about 6% of crew members.

Can NHK-kun do another thorough special feature?

>>73

Maybe these 6% are the type that won’t change their opinion no matter what you show them.

A type that feels strong stress and rejects acknowledging their own mistakes.