Well, I understand the feeling of not wanting to fail since it’s expensive…

>>2

I wonder if there are people who play games just to complain in this thread…

The certification of not playing is based on weak grounds.

The spirit of “not for me” is important.

If the good points greatly outweigh the bad ones, then you can overlook the bad ones.

Even if it’s expensive, it’s at most ten thousand yen.

It’s not a big deal compared to a car.

Dissatisfaction is something that comes up once you satisfy the previous one, doesn’t it?

No one really knows what they are truly seeking.

I’ve been at it for hundreds of hours, but I don’t understand why it’s still making that noise.

>>12

Was it difficult to say something if there was even a little bit of something wrong?

I don’t know what the critical dissatisfaction is for the person, and I sometimes dismiss what seems like a minor issue when the other person is getting upset about something I find unimportant…

Forming opinions about someone’s impressions is generally futile.

>>14

I’m not bald!

Comprehensive user review

It’s somewhat popular, but it feels a bit suspicious.

Complete affirmation and complete denial are both illnesses, aren’t they?

There are some people who complain but haven’t bought anything; they just want to make a fuss.

>>20

Well, that’s just wanting to close your eyes to it. It’s a way of thinking that’s too common in society to be called a sickness.

There are quite a few negative reviews that start with a pretext like “I’ve achieved all the accomplishments to prevent the acknowledgment of such legitimacy.”

Ninja Gaiden 2 Black has come out, and when I casually searched for reviews, it seems to be getting a good reception, but there were also quite a few voices saying that the original version 2 is still better!

I bought it thinking it would be good if it felt nice, and it turned out to be interesting.

It’s unavoidable because things are overflowing.

I think it’s better to learn to evaluate through positive points rather than using a point deduction system.

Because there is a human psychology that probably includes whether or not one had expectations…

It’s not necessary for users to give a flat evaluation.

With a point deduction method, unless the work is exceptionally flawless, most good works will end up with a passing score and everything else will receive a score of 0.

I think judgment criteria also require a sense of balance.

I keep in mind that there should be no reason for me to make the game boring myself.

For now, you can act like a critic just by hitting it.

Someone who can’t talk about both the good and the bad is fundamentally untrustworthy.

It’s a mess here, but even if I say it’s good, I still get scolded quite a bit.

Both players and users probably find it easier to be passive.

However, erotic mods are not acceptable like that.

Nothing will begin unless you take the first step yourself.

There are people who depend on the pleasure obtained from complaints and dissatisfaction.

>>31

This certainly exists, but the people involved are trying to remain calm despite being furious.

First, your sexual preference.

That is the basic form of an ero MOD.

The spirit of “I like you.”

Metal Gear Survive and DMC Nakura.

It was like that.

Using a point addition method doesn’t necessarily mean there won’t be any dissatisfaction…

Masterpiece!!

ka

Crap!!

It has become inevitable.

>>37

There are quite a few things that have good reviews but just don’t suit me…

The reverse is true.

What I think is good might actually be bad for someone else, huh? (lol)

To those who say the game is bad without even properly understanding the game system.

I want to say that the one who’s underperforming is your arm.

Well, even if I look at reviews, I only pay attention to those that seem to have a balanced view of both positive and negative aspects, so honestly, I don’t care.

Eliminate the bad parts.

Aren’t you going to lose it?

Then I’ll stop playing educational games…

When talking about the bad parts, I only mention the bad aspects, so it might just look that way as a result.

It’s not as bad as people say when you play it, but it’s the kind of thing that makes you want to say something.

Rather, the games are too cheap.

That’s why there are more low-level users and more complaints.

Even if a game looks boring because of reviews, I usually have fun playing it on Steam.

I try not to refer to it unless it’s a significant bug or something.

It’s a good idea to think twice about complaining even about reviews that score 4 or above or in the upper 80s.

Unlike in the old days, there are updates now…

I think the significant deductions have pretty much disappeared at this point, right?

On the other hand, I feel like the Metascore is inflated a lot.

You can’t just keep getting scores in the 90s so easily.

I understand complaining about the game, but…

What is it that makes you start disparaging the manufacturers and even the fans?

For example, a tingling crunch and a difficulty level that anyone can clear cannot coexist.

In the end, everything is a trade-off… it’s a relationship that cannot exist simultaneously.

People tend to exaggerate when there are parts they dislike…

It is better not to rely too much on extreme evaluations.

…there are occasionally unfortunate collision accidents that result in extreme outcomes.

If you’re going to put in a lot of effort, games are still cheap, right?

Fishing costs can easily exceed 10,000 yen just for transportation after a few trips.

>>54

Well, the game has always been cheap.

Some people say that game software was expensive a long time ago, but I think it’s because those old games didn’t even have a retry feature, so it probably took a lot of time to clear them.

These days, a full-priced game that lasts around 30 hours is considered to have low volume, but being able to spend around 10,000 yen for 30 hours is quite something.

It’s a very fast and stable car from Wangan Midnight! There’s some overlap with surf games.

I won’t forgive those who post reviews after playing for just 1 to 2 hours.

I can forgive a game that lasts for 2 hours.

I think it’s just poor people who have fallen ill because of their distorted thinking patterns of all-or-nothing thinking associated with depression and developmental disorders.

Gamers are aging too, and they can no longer maintain their self-esteem unless they’re constantly complaining about something.

I just bought a Monarch for 1000 yen.

Looking forward to it in various ways.

There was a time when NEW LovePlus was completely filled with bugs.

The anti says it’s all air, but it looks like they got a picture of the deluxe edition first-release bonus.

I can’t understand playing games just to complain, but love can sometimes turn into hatred.

>>63

When I actually played and said this to the person I had recommended it to, they got really angry.

I understand complaining, but…

Stop making it like Miki’s end in Devilman.

Good reputation, bad reputation, how are the reviews, a poor work, a masterpiece――

What matters more is how I feel.

Current reviews tend to be extreme (like video thumbnails or article titles).

If you keep watching things like that, you’ll get pulled in too.

People who say this is crap just because everyone around them is saying it is crap.

>>66

I don’t see stuff like that, and I don’t pay attention to strange reviews, so it probably just doesn’t resonate with me.

Seriously, you’re worrying too much about unnecessary things.

>>66

I feel like opinions about movies are really polarized, whether they’re good or bad.

To be precise, it’s like the work that had a little buzz gets tilted more towards one side.

Isn’t it interesting? It’s treated like a masterpiece of the century.

I heard it was popular back then, but after trying it, I thought it was impossible for me.

Xanadu

No, at first it’s pretty enjoyable.

But I realize that this is not “that kind” of game.

Then it’s already impossible.

>>68

It’s tough since I realized that this game involves managing limited resources.

I just cleared it with the SS remake.

This is really a terrible game.

I understand why I am being called trash.

Compared to other games, it cannot be praised at all.

But you know… this game has something that others don’t…

Everyone has experienced at least one game.

I think it’s quite strange to comment on someone else’s opinions in a space specifically set up for a large number of unspecified people to freely share their personal impressions.

I can’t keep up! The spirit of that is important.

Recent games are often greatly improved through updates.

But those who experienced the worst times at the beginning rarely come back, so there is a gap in experiences among players and fractures are created.

Stop saying nonsensical things and just do it by yourself.

There are people who keep bringing up the story of when I flopped big time.

It’s nice when people get annoyed and distance themselves.

I understand that we need to talk about the bad things too!

People who only want to talk about the bad things come out too easily.

They are thought to be a race that is incredibly bad at communication.

I think that as part of the human mental framework, we tend to strongly remember experiences where we were told negative things, and often we project that onto new people we meet, saying “Is it that story again?!”

I think it’s crap because it doesn’t suit me, that dying game.

>>80

It’s good to think.

What I think is

It’s strange that you can’t respond to negative talk positively!

You’re the one who brought about this negative flow, but it doesn’t really surprise me.

The combat balance that can be managed with sloppy play is pretty appreciated, isn’t it?

What a game this is!

It has reached 3 million downloads, hasn’t it?

>>85

Hmph…

Recent games are coming out.

New release low rating

300 works ─────

Not many people want to have a shitty conversation, whether they are the same person or meeting for the first time…

Humans are creatures that want to talk crap because they’re currently getting fired up with complaints.

>>88

It’s a story that you’re not that noble either if you want to make a point about something that’s at a level where it’s bad for the fact that you’re looking at it.

It’s a stream I watched recently.

It was so annoying that viewers without names kept nitpicking a game from about 30 years ago with a modern perspective.

>>90

Whether it’s a book or a video, it’s obvious that if you watch it now, you’ll express your thoughts from your current perspective.

The ones who can’t ignore negative opinions are the most troublesome.

If you leave them alone and they are buried in complaints, then there were probably just more people like that in the first place, and even if you push back, it will just end up being a response without actually discussing it.

>>91

Perhaps it’s because this type of person is intellectually armed with the argument of protecting their work.

I think it’s okay to say any abusive words to the other person, and it’s unpleasant to see how nasty they are from the outside…

Well, it might be that type of troll.

I’m not a critic, so don’t expect me to comment with the current situation in mind…

What is the rating of Wangan Midnight in the arcade? (laughs)

>>95

I think the AI in the doppelganger battle is not bad, except for the trashy blockers.

>>105

I’m going to put it on… are you coming too?

Regarding reviews, it’s better to read them after playing, thinking “Yeah,” rather than as a reference when buying.

I might have more chances to say things like “You don’t understand anything, do you?”

On the other hand, there are those who try to dismiss parts that were problematic back then just because it’s an old game.

The BGM is good, just like how a character can be cute in a terrible anime.

People often say, “Games used to be like this!” but even back then, there were definitely some terrible examples.

There’s nothing you can do if the technical shortcomings of old games are criticized compared to now.

It would be better for everyone if you just stop watching and leave, right?

>>100

If you know there are unpleasant people, you don’t have to get involved on purpose; it would be better for you to leave and be happy.

>>100

Is that really everyone?

I basically love retro games, but I think it’s lame when people, just for the sake of it, say before the remake is released, “The old version was so much better!”

Especially in the case of works from the era of older disk media

>>106

When you try to replay games from the PS1 era, it tends to be painful to deal with loading times unless the game was quite innovative.

Even among those who share the same dissatisfaction, if their language is really foul, I want to distance myself.

In a review where the total score is 100 points, what should the average score be?

I think now a score of 90 has become the norm.

Well, it feels like that’s the result of not being able to coexist.

>>112

I think there are places where it’s becoming the case that there’s no reason to build a home for the anti-community since they keep being destroyed, relocating, and then destroying their new location again, repeating the cycle.

>>114

The Pokémon haters aren’t extinct, they’re just settling down, so it’s not like that.

I think people who can’t tolerate differing opinions don’t understand what user reviews are in the first place.

It’s not good to label someone with complaints as an anti and try to silence them, but I can still understand it.

When I saw someone treating those who were dissatisfied as if they had a problem with your intelligence by saying to go to a welfare center, it was infuriating.

It turned into dignity…

>>115

I want to express it that way towards someone with a bad attitude who only seems to nitpick.

It would be easier to convey than to say it gently.

The only one that spends time and money to respond is the GT-R, you know…

You will assess and play to win on your own.

If anything, I could make more noise back in the day.

I can’t say it now because I’ll get criticized.

>>119

It depends on the work…

It’s easier to criticize content that has a small number of fans who are basic otaku.

Regardless of affirmation or denial, I have a sense of openness, thinking like this…

I feel like there are more people who can’t accept that there are those who don’t think so.