
Please stop drawing blasts already…
I remade it, but I can’t tell what’s different from the last time…
>>3
I think this is the biggest problem.
That’s enough.
It’s quite an experience to read a manga while thinking that the part I’m currently reading might disappear…
>>5
It feels like the meter needle swings all the way when Blast starts talking about Void and God.
That person would be fine as it is in the original work.
I don’t really understand what I’m reading, but what is it that you dislike so much?
I really hope you never do that again.
I have almost zero trust now.
Start over before the blast comes out.
This is the first time I’ve read a manga while questioning my memory, wondering if this story really didn’t happen…
Bad habits from around Boros.
This bad habit is showing up too soon.
It was interesting because that person, whose name I don’t even know, is leaving just like that.
It seems that they are trying to reflect and return to the original work.
Let’s try to view it with warm eyes.
>>13
It’s become a topic of discussion again in a bad way because it was canceled this time!
I can tell that stopping Blast from using Saitama’s “Yoisho” has made his personality feel firmer than before.
I can tell this guy is the source of the problem because his character has changed the most.
It’s nice that you can rewrite electronic serials, but there’s a limit to it, isn’t there?
What is needed for a blast is not to give more opportunities but to reduce opportunities as much as possible…
That person being defeated in one punch without really understanding what was happening.
I wonder if this author cannot understand the underlying spirit of the gags in One Punch Man.
If you’re struggling with a blast that has no original plan, then you don’t have to release it… right?
>>18
I think you want to squeeze in a chance for your favorite character to use their blast.
Do you have any awareness that you are selling off the trust you have built up since the time of Eyeshield?
If you have enough artistic skill that you don’t need to pander to the readers, would it be different?
(What knowledge should I have right now… Was it the first time the name “Void” was mentioned…?)
The fact that the Blast members were a bit flustered and had a whiff of being petty has also been overlooked, hasn’t it?
Since I have an abundance of money and time, I don’t need to worry about deadlines or quotas.
It seems like they already think their own manga is a work of art.
You should have them write your name on one more.
>>24
You’re not even updating your own stuff properly?
>>24
There was a time when I unnecessarily inflated the names you drew for me, right?
It’s fine to dig into that person, and surviving is okay, but make sure you get one-punched by the bald guy first.
If it’s changed enough for the table to turn into a zero pan
I can still understand the reason for the change (regardless of whether I agree with the changes or not).
It feels like they’re just repeating minor changes around Blast and Void, and I don’t even know what they’re aiming for anymore…
It has gone beyond the stage of rejection and entered the stage of fear.
I can’t believe that the original side would repeatedly nullify a story that has reached the stage of a completed manuscript, so it seems that ONE is not completely involved after all.
No matter how many times I redraw it, money keeps coming in from anime, merchandise, and pachinko.
It’s like I’m reading a work of the author’s hobby.
This is a different pattern of illness than Togashi.
>>31
I really want to see the continuation, so I hope my back gets better even just a little.
>>53
Unfortunately, once a part is broken, especially the lower back…
I just realized that the original work was updated last month…
I understand how the characters in a loop story feel when they go crazy!
>>33
It’s a rare experience in a way, but I’m not happy about it…!
When rewriting, the rule is to turn the thread image upside down.
If you’re going to rewrite it, just start from zero, or something like that…
Playing at being a manga artist.
I no longer need the setting of the void and the developments that support it…
Is it Jukai Shonen ZOO1?
Once you put something out into the world, don’t pull it back multiple times.
Don’t underestimate manga.
Isn’t this the power of a god?
>>40
Your manuscript is confiscated.
_
There is no translatable content in the provided text as it appears to be a combination of characters without a specific meaning.
( ^ω^) < This thread comes up regularly, NYAN!
. / to )_
.(((( Sh-‐I ┘ Tekuteku…
>>42
Tell Professor Murata.
It’s a topic that seems likely to gain value decades later in a standalone book.
Many great manga artists from the past have done it, so it’s not unusual to pretend it wasn’t published as a standalone book.
If that task becomes accessible on the web and can be viewed in real-time, then that’s not too bad.
What does Blast want to do with the Void?
Saitama was so outside of it that there was no motivation to get involved.
Did you redo it because you wanted to clarify this part?
I feel like it’s getting closer to the ONE version compared to before, excluding the blast.
I guess I can do it because drawing itself isn’t a burden for me…
>>49
The picture I want to draw is probably at a level where I can output it immediately.
Monster Yusuke Murata
Danger Level: God
Disaster Level: Dragon
“A man who is convinced he is Blast.”
Let’s go with this.
The third season of the anime looks amazing too.
Isn’t the editing in Murata’s hands?
It was beautiful while we didn’t know the true identity, Blast.
>>55
That person as well.
>>55
I’m really curious about how they will introduce and make them active in the original version.
>>95
Aren’t Blast and God only planning to be collected in the Murata version?
In the original work, the existence of God is only mentioned when it comes to the Homeless Emperor, and that’s it, so there’s no point in appearing.
It’s ONEm’s fault for having too many original works.
>>56
It has nothing to do with ONE.
>>84
The original work isn’t doing its job, so that’s why it’s like this; it definitely matters.
So, does that mean ONE isn’t getting paid?
>>107
The original work has already been completed and exists, right?
What do you mean by saying I’m not working?
>>56
Before ONE did multiple adaptations, he was already redoing things a lot, right?
Rather, it’s because Murata’s foot-dragging doesn’t generate income that I started another original work, right?
Isn’t it the case that the first scene of Sonic vs. Flash was better, not to mention that I can’t even tell the difference…?
Simply put, Blast isn’t that strong either…
>>58
I am redrawing it because I can’t forgive the fact that you thought that.
>>91
Then you should rewrite it from the Garou arc.
I don’t want to complain because it’s free, but please explain once how you’re going about the redraw!
>>59
Everyone can’t help but wonder what’s happening behind the scenes, right?
It’s okay to talk about Blast and Void, but there’s no need to do it in such a lingering way.
Let it end with a digest.
In the original work, I’m scared of Flash having to compensate for his sword.
It’s a scene where I go to confiscate the sword from Sonic, who would likely attack if I just loiter around.
It’s strange how it seems like it’s all for Sonic.
I think it’s questionable to do a redo even once.
Not giving up and redoing things multiple times shows that I’m a bit too strong-hearted.
I wish they would redo the zero part as well.
Is there still an enthusiastic anonymous person making a summary of the changes?
Blast is too much of a nuisance in various ways…
>>67
I’ve redrawn it so much that I don’t know who’s at fault.
Is Mr. Murata not affected by God’s power? Are you okay?
I thought Blast would finally step back to the sidelines.
It seems like they’re going to get really involved again, and I thought, “No way…”
That’s not something a professional would do.
It’s not a series, you know.
Use all of this production cost for Tatsumaki.
>>76
Tatsumaki’s part really escalated in a good way.
Wasn’t it the case that the appearance of Blast’s allies during the Garou arc was also disregarded?
If I had just finished polishing the ONE version and caught up, it would have been really peaceful since I was planning spin-offs and original manga for other characters.
Is there any point in having the original side’s name if the animation starts to inflate things from the beginning?
I don’t know if Murata’s blast is weak or if blasts are inherently weak, but so far I only have the impression that he is struggling.
If Hage hadn’t come, I would have been killed by Garou.
It’s exhausting to have to explain every single action and statement.
Please redraw it after finishing the first draft!
If I draw a lot of pages, I can get more manuscript fees, so I guess that’s good enough.
>>83
I hate to speculate, but this manga hasn’t paid any manuscript fees.
The royalties from the paperback are Murata’s only income.
Respect for superhero movies that reboot a lot (prejudice).
>>85
There’s no way I’d do it this often!
Sorry! I have an urgent matter!! Please let me leave by using dimensional teleportation.
It’s fine to just fill in the gaps of the original work, but they are doing too much unnecessary stuff.
I’m just curious whose idea it was to introduce Blast.
Honestly, it’s amazing that the editorial team is allowing this.
I guess they really want to go back further, but the paperback is just a save point and they can’t go back any more than that.
To be honest, it’s okay to pretend that zero bread never existed.
Redraw from the low table.
What I know for sure is information.
– The script is written by ONE and the artwork is handled by Murata.
The story is unfolding as the two discuss and decide on the developments.
Both proposals have been incorporated, and there have been times when ONE’s proposal was rejected.
– The last rewind was proposed by Murata.
Everything else is being discussed based on speculation.
>>98
It’s strange for the original creator’s proposal to be rejected.
>>106
That itself has happened in One Piece and Naruto as well…
I want you to 공개 the ONE name.
Honestly, I feel like even a single volume might be subject to a rollback.
Honestly, I don’t feel much respect for ONE.
I want you to keep looping until you run out of strength.
That old man’s kid probably can’t pull off blue.
It wasn’t very interesting in the original work either, so I hope it can be passed through quickly.
Every time I peek at the thread, I wonder if it’s a good or bad thing that I’ve only read the original work.
Rewriting is like taking a dish that has already been served to a customer in a restaurant, snatching it away, throwing it in the trash right in front of them, and starting to make a different dish.
I think it would be funny if the original Blast ended up being completely different.
Lately, there haven’t been many hits in the loop genre, so it’s okay to have one once in a while.
>>113
For loop stories, if they don’t give meaning to the accumulation, then…
Regardless of the past alteration, it really makes things feel dull to disregard the previous week.
There is a personal testimony that the original name was inflated tenfold.
The volume stopped right at the timing of the battle against Galou, so if I wanted to, I could seriously redo Zero Pan.
In that case, the amount of rewind would be extraordinary, so we would have to do the sister bickering chapter of Fubuki and Tatsumaki again…
Both Blast and Void have a strong feeling of being original characters that float around, and I wonder what it is that makes me feel no attachment to them at all.
How many times do the Nintendo guys have to be taken out in an instant?
If this were a Murata version of an original character like Suiryuu, it would have been better.
Why did they start this nonsense with a character who seemed to have an important role in the original work but hasn’t appeared?
I found it interesting when I re-read the early chapters that were drawn almost unchanged from the original.
Once you release the blast, it’s already a completely different entity, so no matter how many times you redraw it, it won’t change anything.
It’s problematic that I’m trying to depict the existence of my wife to connect to Blue.
Also, intertwining the kami and void is a bit strange.
The setting around that person changes every time it is rewritten.
Why are you fixated on a character that’s just there for a gag, getting one-punched with settings that won’t show up again?
They are probably redrawing it because they are being criticized, and they get criticized for deviating from the original material.
Blast absolutely won’t retract, what’s going on?
I thought the rewrites up to the second episode had a bit of a blast of noise, but overall followed the original flow, but then the Void appeared again in the third episode…
When you think about it, Murata’s original character Suiryuu has become properly interesting.
I wonder why Murata’s original character, Blast, has become such a boring character.
>>129
Is it interesting?
>>129
The tournament edition featuring Suiryu is drawn by ONE.
It’s mostly away from ONE’s control.
Isn’t ONE increasing another serialization?
When comparing, this time it has been designed so that the stock of Flash does not drop.
It seems that treating it almost the same as Sonic was a problem.
It would be fine just to do it exactly as the original.
>>132
If you stick to the original, there’s no meaning in doing a remake… You might as well just read the original…
>>144
Don’t say things like an anime director from 20 years ago.
If it’s just the Blast alone, it’s not that bad, but having a lot of companions and secretly doing Avengers-type activities is a huge distraction.
Some people refer to re-drawing as the multiverse, but in American comics, the multiverse is depicted as one possibility, one work, that is fully developed until the end.
This is just a simple redo.
It’s disrespectful to American comics.
To be honest, the development of the Garou arc and Blast makes it impossible to return to the atmosphere of the original story.
They should just go with a completely original development.
They might be struggling to go in a different direction because they’re catching up to the original work!
It might be best to be satisfied just by looking at the cover illustration.
It’s fine to rewrite it, but it’s tough that the conversation hasn’t progressed at all for the past few years.
When will I be able to see the transformation release of Amami?
I don’t think Blast is even a pre-release.
Did ONE really give off that much of a comic book vibe to portray a character that is just like those American comics?
The only good part is that the repeated poor changes make the essence of the original’s skill and fun become more apparent.
I used to think that Blast was someone who, like Saitama, had surpassed their limits.
That’s not it.
I was irritated while rewriting the design of Boros multiple times, but who would have thought it would turn out to be something cute…
If the name on page 12 is increased by ten times, doesn’t that defeat the purpose of the name?
The relationship between Blast and the gods is amazing in how boring it is.
If it’s Murata’s suggestion, then it really shows a lack of talent.
Was the blast digging too quick?
The Murata version might be the final edition.
During the Suiryu era, one was publishing names, right?
“I’ve seen anonymous people getting angry, saying things like ‘Murata is only thinking about making money easily’.”
I don’t think they’re thinking about making money easily…
>>152
I’m putting in unnecessary effort that I don’t have to do.
>>152
If you just want to make money, you can just focus on being a drawing machine…
>>152
I feel like I’m the type of craftsman who tends to disregard profitability and ends up failing.
>>152
A person who thinks that way is still an easier type to understand, but…
>>152
I don’t know why, but all I want to do is redraw it.
I have no idea why you want to change it.
>>152
I think this redo is probably done in a realm that doesn’t even relate to how readers will react.
Like a stoic seeker, it’s about whether or not I am satisfied with the work, and it seems that I also desperately wanted to redraw Eyeshield.
>>180
Don’t do it based on someone else’s story.
That’s how it is.
>>186
That is correct.
I think I’ll set it aside for a while before reading it.
It’s no wonder that original character overpowered stories are disliked.
The hijacking, degradation, and privatization of existing characters evokes an intense feeling of disgust.
Why did it turn out this way, Murata-san?
There’s no way that ONE, who places immense importance on character redemption and growth, would depict Garou as a character lacking any growth or reflection.
It’s good if they can make it interesting by changing from the original.
Murata doesn’t have that ability, so he’s only doing illustration work, right?
>>157
Since I don’t think that way myself, that’s why things are like this.
>>174
It’s really amazing not to give up and think that it’s impossible for yourself when trying again.
My mental is made of steel.
Isn’t it just spending too much time on the process until you reach a one-punch?
I thought it was questionable whether it was okay to confirm in Murata’s version whether Blue is really a child of Blast or a human, considering it was ambiguous in the original work.
I don’t know when there will be another table flip like Ryumon.
The timing to unleash the blast is also a thing.
It was already clear that it had a combat power less than Garou Boros and higher than Tatsumaki, so there was no need to bring it out…
Let me read the one that got ruined too.
The tournament arc of Suiryuu clearly distinguishes between those who are just strong and true heroes, and it doesn’t impact the main storyline, which is great.
>>164
That place has ONE cutting the names, so even the suddenly appearing supporting fighter characters all have distinct personalities.
On the other hand, Blast, who often appears in the village, has been out for three years now but still hasn’t established a character and remains just a “random old guy,” which makes it clear that the character is one that Murata is drawing on his own in the village story.
I recently started reading it, and I was wondering why it’s always being criticized, but now I understand…
If we keep repeating things like this, it defeats the original purpose of the name.
I can’t help but speculate that the other side might just be saying to go ahead and draw freely based on the original work published on the site.
You can still turn back.
If you hold onto your childish stubbornness here, it will lead you to being one of the worst kinds of manga artists.
>>167
Already…
Together with a disease that repeatedly requires surgery.
Actually, I don’t know how far it has been disregarded.
I can’t believe that ONE, who hasn’t updated the original work at all and is juggling two other series, would decide to discard a whole year of serialization and start over.
The disease of being unable to complete things.
After re-reading it, I couldn’t help but laugh at how Flash took the back of Blast, then Blast took it back, and Flash was sweating—it happened twice.
Don’t study, Flash!
I mean, even Mr. Murata must be tired of drawing the same story over and over, right?
Since I’ve earned enough to not have to work for the rest of my life at the point of Eyeshield, I think now I’m doing it purely for fun.
I’m not intending to do it as work, so I keep redrawing it.
I can confidently say that I am doing my best purely because I find it interesting.
It’s bad that it’s continuing to slide at an accident level…
It’s too hard to accept that a year of animation at this level has been lost.
There are countless works I want to see in this picture, so please treat it with care…
I shouldn’t have trusted that it would be done for free…
>>183
Ramen bald…
ONE has completely withdrawn, hasn’t it?
If it weren’t, I wouldn’t be able to redraw it or shoot it three times.
I think it’s a bad thing that I learned to push my way through with my art just because I’m somewhat good at drawing.
If I were clumsy, I would have tried to come up with something using the scenario or composition.
The psychology of repeatedly undergoing plastic surgery does seem to be similar.
Hmm, I want those who imitate craftsmen to do it originally.
“I liked the part where I took Sonic’s sword and gave it to Flash so that it could be considered as if nothing happened.”
They might be trying to be artistic, but they only seem to be on the same level as Gataro.
I mean, it’s not Murata’s fault, it’s the editor’s, right?
Are you motivated?
>>192
It seems that there was a contract stating that the editors wouldn’t interfere, which was mentioned at the beginning of the serialization.
Is it such an important story that you need to rewrite what you’re currently working on?
Aren’t there a lot of retakes starting around the Garou arc?
On the contrary, it may be more suited to a weekly serialized format.
If I could dedicate myself to being a drawing machine like Obata…
I feel like I understand why I can’t live on a weekly basis.
>>199
Are they going to certify that Murata can’t survive!?
Since we’re getting paid, let’s do our job properly.
Fans who praised the padding of the Garou arc are also to blame.
If we had properly criticized it back then, it wouldn’t have turned out this way.
Deadlines are important, aren’t they?
Do you need a blast?
I feel a steel resolve that they absolutely will not fix that, even if I tell them to stop using the blast.