>>3

That’s helpful.

I have never referred to reviews, both now and in the past.

The desire to tickle the nostalgia of the elderly overflows from the title of the article.

I use reviews to decide not to buy games that lean towards not being worth purchasing.

In conclusion, it seems that there are many reviews that essentially depend on individual feelings, which diminishes their overall meaning.

It feels like it’s better to look for trustworthy individuals after going around in circles.

It’s unavoidable because those kinds of reviews get a lot of likes and are displayed at the top of the list.

There are sometimes games that look like a free-running puzzle-solving game, but in reality, they are puzzle games, so I just check them out to confirm that, and I don’t really care too much about evaluating their quality.

I repeated a year because of this.

100 points

>>16

Even if I give a hundred steps, it’s okay if it’s roundabout but ultimately praising, but it takes a lot of time so I wouldn’t recommend it. I wish those who give low ratings would just die.

>>16

This is how irony is expressed in English-speaking countries.

Thanks to you, I’m dead, or I can’t go out because of you, is that what you’re praising?

>>29

Even if I rephrase it to say “I played for a long time because it was very interesting,” it’s still worthless as a review.

Someone who wants to sell based on impressions has appeared.

When I read the reviews for the terrible gacha game’s five-star rating…

“It’s not a 5-star rating just because it’s interesting, right? It’s a 5-star rating because observing it is fun, even though the updates keep going downhill.” I thought I should write this in my note.

This is the best game (as of the time of review, 0.5 hours).

It’s only natural that amateur reviews only score based on whether they like or dislike something.

We should have students write more book reports at school.

I always think it’s impressive how you manage to write such long reviews every time.

There are probably regular reviews too, so there’s no need to get angry over the parody reviews, right?

If that’s the only option, that would be a problem.

>>26

Obstacle

Playing around with stars can strangely affect the evaluation.

If it’s easy to read, that’s good, but personally, I don’t need long reviews either.

It’s usually ugly and bothersome.

When a work that has gone viral, whether good or bad, heats up in one direction…

It seems like there are only people left who tend to exaggerate.

There are clearly ★5 ratings from vendors and ★1 ratings from foolish haters as well.

There are two highly praised reviews for Zico.

Star 3.8

I like reviewers who list ratings on Steam using a 5-point scale.

If the reviews themselves were tagged and categorized, it would be easier to reach the type of review I want.

There are numerous problems, such as how accurately things can be sorted and who will go through the trouble of doing it.

>>33

I need a review from the reviewer.

>>38

If you do that, the reviewers will gain too much power and it will become complicated.

It tends to emphasize the regrettable parts excessively.

Most of the reviews done by people are just because they want to unlock achievements for themselves.

The moment I tried to do it, the server went down for maintenance, so I give it 1 star.

Don’t let the feelings of those who haven’t bought it be attached to the product.

There are too many people reviewing reviews, it’s exhausting.

Even though I’m praising it a lot, how should I view the fact that the playtime isn’t that significant?

>>45

At least at first, it’s really interesting.

Online reviews are just a shitty tool for the uninvolved to feel like they’ve done something.

The reviewer’s reviews must be a hell of endless suffering.

There is definitely peer pressure.

It would be helpful and informative if you could write not just “It was interesting,” but also which particular parts made you feel that way.

>>49

Writing positive evaluations properly is very difficult…

There has been an increase in people who say they can no longer trust their own preferences when the things they like receive negative reviews.

There are many people who fundamentally don’t understand that it’s a review and critique, not just a personal impression.

Favorite review

You only need to read reviews from trustworthy reviewers.

Don’t rely on the words of someone you don’t know.

>>53

It seems like the Steam curators are going in this direction.

>>53

You can’t possibly remember the names of every single person who reviews things, especially if they’re just writers doing play articles.

>>57

If I say just read the play articles and don’t look at the store reviews, will you understand?

I dislike people who are oddly high-energy, not just in games.

This game made me gay.

I am a person who writes reviews based only on whether I could get off or felt libido from scenes involving Zico’s futanari and pseudo-excretion and anal relationships, how many scenes there were, and whether they appeared in past works…

If there are fairly interesting reviews, the number of pathetic people trying to become interesting themselves increases.

I can sense the thinness of the scenario and deficiencies in specifications by broadly reviewing feedback.

A review that mentions the presence and accuracy of the Japanese translation.

I love you.

>>63

An unofficial Japanese translation MOD is being distributed on this site, and it has a translation that captures the game’s atmosphere well, so if you don’t have any objections, I recommend using that one.

According to the information on the site, the way to implement it was somewhat unclear, so I will organize and summarize the steps I took below.

It’s what the experts in futanari, simulated excretion, and anal say!

Regarding futanari, pseudo-excretion, and the anus, I trust it!

Is it read in that kind of way?

I will play the game that I will review from now on.

The motivation to write a review comes from the desire to express some feelings, specifically when something has moved me deeply.

I think there are more and more people who want to become content themselves, not just in games but also in movie reviews.

>>68

Rather, I think there have been many amateur movie reviewers who have been writing with that intention for a long time.

I understand wanting higher quality reviews from professional writers, but…

You can’t expect too much from a single user’s review on Steam.

>>69

I’m not expecting an amateur to provide a professional-level review.

It’s just asking that even if you’re an amateur, please don’t write extremely terrible reviews.

>>75

If you don’t train properly, writing is generally a disaster!

I’m trying to say something clever that’s different from everyone else, but it’s scary because there are actually people who give low ratings while pretending to praise.

In the past, it was said that a 3-star Amazon review was a bad habit of Japanese people, but now it’s being selfish.

>>71

It’s just saying to write reviews that benefit the seller…

>>77

Ultimately, it has to be a good text that can properly stimulate the purchasing desire of the other party on par with a ☆5 rating, or it won’t do.

>>101

Is it dlsite?

Even if the issues are resolved in the update, the initial negative reviews remain and do not disappear.

The ideal is a list of mechanical critiques.

I want to cast a curse that makes the fingers of those who try to stand out and make people laugh in their reviews explode into smithereens.

>>84

Do you not even understand the difference between a response and a review?

>>84

This is not a place for reviews…

The proportion of reviews where people try to say something clever on Steam is noticeably higher compared to other review sites.

Even when a smelly guy is giving compliments, it still stinks.

First of all, the maximum 5-star review itself has quite a few flaws in its evaluation.

Many places hire somewhat randomly, but since they haven’t established criteria, the standards vary depending on the person, and both 1 and 2 are almost non-functional.

>>78

You use a 1-star rating when you really want to criticize something that was terrible.

The one that isn’t functioning is ☆2.

Is there no way to hide the person writing this review?

I wish it could be done.

Because you said “don’t give me three,” there’s only 1 or 5 left, right…?

The internet will become more extreme one way or another, but still…

Even without malice, there are times when flaws appear charming, so if you like a game, you tend to overlook its shortcomings, and if you didn’t like a game, you might criticize it even if it has a similar level of quality; you won’t know if a reviewer is one of those people unless you follow them.

There are a ton of reviewers who claim to be someone like ○○ on anonymous message boards.

I often find people writing surprisingly well on Amazon book reviews, and when I check their profiles, they turn out to be professional authors or university professors researching that field, so it seems there is definitely a difference in skill level.

>>85

Could it be that this is a problem with the review demographic…?

>>90

I see.

I don’t like silly reviews, but I ended up liking a review that angrily complains about a series that’s supposed to be sexy but doesn’t even show nipples!!

The shortcomings written in good are

The strengths written in bad are trustworthy.

Too much play, so it’s a low rating!

>>91

The more low-rated reviews there are, the more reliable the parental control app community becomes.

I wonder if it’s still like that now…

All humanity plays.

Although it is said not to criticize others, when a comparison is made and explained specifically how this is different in this way compared to that, it becomes easier to understand as a review.

Wasn’t there a function on Steam to exclude joke reviews?

>>98

Do you think Steam users are smart enough to use something like that?

>>134

In the first place, it doesn’t disappear as much as you say.

In other words, the scoring criteria vary from person to person.

If you let them write an article with inconsistent standards, it’s only natural that it will become even more inconsistent.

If you’ve played the previous game, comparison reviews are quite helpful.

Well, even Amazon has complaints about delivery services rated with a ☆1 instead of the products themselves…

>>105

This is quite common worldwide, isn’t it?

I only want to know the average rating of reviewers who have made a purchase (with a sample size that dilutes extreme ratings).

I feel something similar in anime and movie reviews as well.

This work has similar points and influenced elements, and it can be recommended to those who like this kind of thing, making it easier to understand when presented in comparison.

It’s almost a 2D Zelda, so it’s often a straightforward appeal to those who like Zelda.

>>110

The level of exaggeration that made the whole country cry! It’s just the usual, isn’t it?

FANZA is really terrible.

I lost the desire to escape.

>>111

I’ve only seen three types of people: those who try to make jokes with dirty jokes, those who tell mysterious personal stories, and those who throw out questions like “Who is the actress?”

The maximum 100-point review feature of the game information site is

In the first place, there were few users, but it gave the impression that the scores were completely messed up.

I want to say that I don’t care about your character at all.

Write a review of the product.

>>114

There’s no real harm, so I don’t feel any ill will.

I used the restaurant as a place to meet a classmate for the first time in ten years, like on Tabelog, reminiscing about memories with friends and such.

This can only be said to be your diary, and I can’t help but laugh at how different our cultures are.

Steam shows playtime, so it’s the best.

If you do it, can I give my thoughts?

Those who don’t do anything have no human rights.

Review from the reviewer ranked in position 〇.

Seeing that some reviews clearly differ from the actual situation makes me unsure of what I can trust anymore…

>>117

The reviewer for Zico last time was terrible…

You’re seriously just tossing things in randomly to compete for numbers, aren’t you…? – Reviewer

If you want to properly conduct evaluations, you need a certain level of objectivity and education.

It’s only natural that a place where monkeys can say what they like would end up buried in feces.

One should search for something better while being prepared for it to be full of crap.

Media sometimes makes mistakes by publishing reviews of games with an expected playtime that is long, clearly indicating they haven’t played to the end.

>>119

Well, there are aspects that can’t be helped.

The average review scores on Steam, Amazon, and dlsite are different, so it is necessary to take that into consideration.

The pinnacle of trash reviews by a ramen enthusiast.

>>121

It’s nice that you’re sharing your own experiences and even doing some sightseeing…

Not good.

>>121

It’s scary when a mysterious text talks about getting to the store and brings up names of unknown people.

Many people believe that using strong words will be well-received.

There is likely a significant proportion of people who can only understand strong words.

In other words, the appropriate strength likely varies greatly from person to person.

>>122

The ability to recognize slight differences in ambiguous gradients is directly related to one’s intelligence.

Children use extreme and strong language because their vocabulary is limited and their sensitivity is dull, so they can only understand through strong stimuli like intense flavors.

>>144

I won’t deny that, but there is definitely a discrepancy in perception about that difference depending on the person, which makes things complicated…

It seems that what cup size is assumed by the terms “larger breasts” or “smaller breasts” varies by person.

So is this a god game? Or a trash game?

Which one should I hit? A kid came here before, and it was like, wow.

Based on the reviewer’s playtime

For now, it’s a short, focused game to enjoy the first moment.

You can understand whether the game can be deeply engaged with.

Why can you review the game just about an hour after its release?

There are parts that are considered detracting factors, but for me, some of them are actually enjoyable, and the opposite is also true.

It seems that restaurant reviews are given scores that are thought to be equivalent to Michelin stars, leading to low ratings without self-awareness.

If it’s a content review, that’s still acceptable, but there are many superficial reviews that haven’t even cleared the game.

I feel like the evaluation that it’s like a ○○ version of Bobobo has been used too much lately and is no longer reliable.

There are also a lot of thoughts about aiming for buzz.

It seems natural in the context of social media that it has shifted to how much self-promotion one can do using their work as a stepping stone.

It’s a good store, but giving it a low rating because you don’t want it to get crowded is absurd.

There are too many reports and reaction comics about somewhat popular movies, saying “Look at my reaction using this movie as bait!”

>>138

Everything about that is exactly the same…

I have a good impression of people who try to spread the word using correlation diagrams or illustrations.

>>162

“Everyone is really just writing the same thing about King & Prince.”

Let’s not review, not look, and be indifferent.

I have information that the stage with thorny instant death frustration rods is common, so when I find out that it’s not the right type for me, I decide to avoid it. That’s why reviews are important.

I think ☆3 is normal, but there are people who consider ☆5 to be normal, so I’d like to see what the criteria are.

It was cute if it was just like anti and believers, but the current otaku scene is excessively focused on going viral.

Because I draw and make weird comparisons.

Even common people’s opinions make me wonder?

>>147

If you look at the writings of anime and eroge fans from the 2000s, you’ll see that they’ve hardly changed at all.

The situation where, for the past few decades, there has been a continuous trend of unnecessarily strong language used for both praise and criticism.

Saying things like “all reviews are trash!” is not much different from the excessive reviews you despise, so you should properly examine the content.

In the comments on the thread’s article, it was said that there are a lot of media reviews too, but it’s still significantly better than aiming for the approval of amateurs.

>>149

I’m using your name.

Well, it’s true that in business you have to compliment no matter what.

So only official Sakura reviews are the truth.

There are more internet reviewers for movies than games, and they aren’t helpful.

Both bulletin boards are not helpful.

>>151

It feels roughly like the MCU.

Tabelog has a system with a word count minimum for reviews, making it necessary to pad them with diary entries and poems, which is a bad system.

Steam has curators and such, so it’s practically better.

It seems that it’s becoming a place where the ability to pick up necessary information is being tested.

There used to be a guy who had an interesting movie account and shared amusing thoughts.

It’s sad that I’ve become a sycophant who praises every movie I see at screenings.

Well, not just in the otaku community, but everywhere used to be full of people who exaggerated stories.

The game feels like a relatively better category given that it requires a lot of effort to play (not considering obvious console wars).

When it becomes the so-called dominant content in anime and mobile games, it’s amazing!

I want to know if it’s a refreshing and easy shooting game or a bullet-dodging type, or something like that.

Movies are good because they usually last two to three hours, but I become quite cautious with games that have a long playtime.

Many people are gathering because the gaming industry is more profitable in terms of visuals.

They were also featured in that special on automata.

Well, when comparing multiple sources, it seems like there are aspects like this, or conversely, this person is the only one saying this.

It seems like it has changed with the update, and in some parts, it can be useful as a reference.

I would rather avoid the opinions of those who review a lot.

It’s not limited to games, but I feel a sense of boredom in how the points of interest tend to converge, leading to a contest of how to express the same elements in different ways.

>>167

Everyone wants their words to go viral.

It seems that there are too many people lately who can’t even figure out what they want without looking at others’ opinions.

>>168

There are too many things to assess on my own, so it can’t be helped.

>>168

What I want now is not things or even experiences.

It’s about joining the circle of people who have experienced it and having fun together…

I think it’s just a matter of being more effective online to use short, impactful phrases rather than accurately conveying the quality of a work in a long text, even if it’s somewhat off the mark.

★1

I can’t get anything good from the gacha.

I think you should do as you please with the review itself.

Doing low ratings as a joke causes trouble for the creators, so go die.

The current target of the movie ‘Surprise House’ is Twilight Warriors.

Also, please do something about the reviews on Tabelog that start from my diary.

Steam’s mechanical curation based on “recommendations from play history” is effective, so please check if the approval rating is high.

After that, just looking at the top reviews should give a general idea of the game content (like something difficult for the manufacturer to write, such as “similar to XX”) and whether there is a Japanese translation patch, and that should be about it.

If it’s an expensive game that makes you want to scrutinize reviews, you generally have a purchase motivation outside of Steam, so you don’t look for it within Steam.

Even in casual conversations with my mom, there’s a natural exaggeration; the world is built on exaggeration.

I want people who say they can reference Steam reviews to read each review one by one.

>>179

It can be referenced as a ratio.

>>179

If there is overwhelming praise, it means there are unlikely to be many bad games that can be referenced.

Write about the things you felt were good and bad in your own words, even if they are not very articulate.

>>180

They casually demand things that are extremely difficult to achieve.

I’m talking at a pretty high level just by using my own words.

>>189

In that case, there’s no need to write a review.

Rather, I think that games are a genre where both their strengths and weaknesses can be easily articulated, and there are many reasonable opinions.

The movie is terrible.

Reviews that write complaints are more helpful.

I can judge for myself that this person is just a complainer.

☆5 is the same as writing nothing.

There are more and more people who don’t even know what they like in the realm of hobbies, not just in work.

I sometimes wonder if there are more people who won’t engage unless it’s defined strongly and clearly from the other side.

When it comes to the mecca of excessive words, it’s the beauty and cosmetics world.

Just by walking down the street, I only know people who throw away all their high-end cosmetics after asking my super attractive friend about the makeup she uses.

People who are looking at reviews are probably wanting to know if what they really want is actually what they’re looking for.

Well, it’s better than places that still have the pretense of being a review.

This place is amazing!

In the first place, the criteria is quite vague, right?

Some people set the reference point at 5 and subtract from there, while others might use 3 or 4 as their reference point and adjust up or down from that.

Reviews lacking specificity are worthless.